Venture Capitalists Adjusting... Or Giving Up?
from the question-of-the-hour dept
All weekend venture capitalists and entrepreneurs have been hotly discussing the NY Times article about top tier VC firm Sevin Rosen deciding to give up on its latest fund and return all the commitments. Sevin Rosen is one of the more distinguished VC names out there, and this move is surprising plenty of people. Getting lots of attention are the claims from Sevin Rosen that, "The traditional venture model seems to us to be broken." Of course, if you've been paying attention to the space for any length of time, that isn't a new comment. But, the real question, then, is why not adjust? VCs always like to pitch that they're about more than just the money -- and it's their operating experience or connections that matters as well. If that were true, then shouldn't they be able to actually figure out a way to adjust to the changing market? The same also goes for the claim that "too much money had flooded the venture business and too many companies were being given financing in every conceivable sector." As VC Fred Wilson points out, VCs have always complained about too much money in the market -- when all they mean is that there's just too much competition. If they really do add so much value above and beyond the money, again, the competition aspect shouldn't be an issue.Finally, they complain about "a terribly weak exit environment," by which they mean the IPO market. However, as many have noted in the past, a weak IPO market isn't necessarily a bad thing. It just means that companies have to actually have a bit more sustainability to their business before they can go public. If you have a real business, it appears you can still go public. So, perhaps the real answer is that Sevin Rosen hasn't yet figured out how they can add real value above and beyond the money they put in, in order to create real businesses with serious exit possibilities. If that's the case, then perhaps it's a good thing they're taking a break to figure out how to change things for themselves. In fact, plenty of venture capital firms might want to do the same. However, this isn't an indictment of the venture capital business, so much as it is of the way that many of the firms in the space have done business.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
This may be a good thing
this is typical but it seems that intentionally
underfudning the business then demanding more
and more equity in the company for additional
funding is not uncommon.
The owners lose control of the company that they
struggled hard build.
And employees who did much all the work, partly
for promises of a pay off at the back end, stock
options, whatever, get "paid for their time."
I've also seen start-ups piddle away the money
as if it were free and forget that they need to
turn a profit eventually... or at least increase
the value of the company somehow.
So it cuts both ways I guess. Probably hurts the
employees the most though. But if the promises
aren't in writing I guess you'd be have to be a
chump to give them any creedence.
Hopefully this weak market will weed out the
Vulture Capitalists from the Venture Capital folks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Wholeheartedly Agree
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This isn't giving up
This firm has a strong record, and are the first to try this strategy. Do you have reasons to say that they're weak or stupid, or did you both just skip the article and decide to comment on the shortcomings of VC as a practical concept?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's the era of bootstrapping
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Green Business is the New Dot-com
When Bill gates invests more than $70 million dollars of his own money in an ethanol plant and Richard Branson commits to spending $3 billion dollars over the next 10 years to combat global change, there must be something to this green stuff.
[ link to this | view in thread ]