Universal Music Finally Sues Video Sites... Just Not YouTube

from the who-else-can-we-sue? dept

Tue, Oct 17th 2006 2:46pm — Mike Masnick

A month ago, Universal Music Group head honcho Doug Morris threatened to sue YouTube and MySpace, claiming that both companies owed UMG a lot of money for all the videos on those sites that used UMG music. As we noted at the time, this seemed mainly like a negotiating ploy -- and it worked. The same day that Google bought YouTube for $1.65 billion, YouTube signed deals with Universal Music Group and a variety of other content providers. However, that was apparently just the beginning for Morris and UMG. They're not happy about all the other video sites out there who haven't agreed to pay up. Now they've finally pulled the trigger and filed lawsuits against smaller sites Bolt.com and Grouper, which was just acquired by Sony. They're pushing for the maximum, claiming each view is an infringement worth $150,000 (the upper boundary of what they can claim). Of course, the DMCA has said that the sites aren't responsible for what their users do, so to get around that, UMG's lawyers are playing a word game to make it seem like these sites have much more control over the content than they really do. They accuse the sites of "copying, reformatting, distributing and creating derivative works from Universal's musicians." Of course, all of that is done automatically as part of the platform, rather than as a conscious decision of anyone at these sites -- which makes it seem like a pretty big stretch to think that the DMCA protections shouldn't work here. Still, the bigger issue, honestly, is UMG's inability to recognize that they're probably doing a lot more damage to their own business here than helping it. Music videos have always been about promotions. They promote the band and the music and get people to buy CDs, go see concerts or get them involved in a variety of other business models. So, here are a bunch of people trying to do Universal's promotions job for them... for free... and Universal is trying to sue them and kill off the promotional value of its own content.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

17 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

MadJo (profile), 17 Oct 2006 @ 3:55pm

huh promotional value?
What do you mean? I have to give away something for free, so I can get more sales? I don't understand this hippy-talk you are babbling, SECURITY!
--- anonymous UMG manager

I can just hear it now.
The music industry has just completely lost it...

And why even that high a number for each viewing?
I'm sure MTV would love to pay that amount of money to play the tracks on their music stations, for *each viewer*... [/sarcasm]
Don't these music-head-honchos notice, how moronic they sound, when they are trying to defend this tactic?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
chucklebutte, 17 Oct 2006 @ 3:57pm

making sense
mike stop making sense please you are scaring me... lmao
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sohrab, 17 Oct 2006 @ 3:59pm

So is google going to have to pay Sony BMG now too cause some of their music might be used on YouTube
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 17 Oct 2006 @ 4:04pm

Intersting...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Michael, 17 Oct 2006 @ 4:25pm

Broken record... Why do I keep this site on my feed list again? I can't seem to recall....

First post!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Eeqmcsq, 17 Oct 2006 @ 4:28pm

Free publicity
And these lawsuits are just going to give more free publicity to these other lesser known sites.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mr. X, 17 Oct 2006 @ 4:40pm

Surprise! Another
TechDirt: More "we think the entertainment industry is stupid" articles than anyone on the planet. That's our promise to you!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rick, 17 Oct 2006 @ 7:09pm

Geee Go figure
Has nothing to do with rights infringment. Its all a money game, as long as they can get every dime squeezed out of evey little video clip or song clip, they will do it. They dont care about artists rights anymore then they do our rights. It wont stop till people stop putting things like videos and song s on their sites and web pages, and you know that will never happen. We as a people dont care who has to pay for it as long as it is not us. And when youtube and myspace decide to charge us, cause they have to pay up, then we complain. Its a no win, fix it or live with it, stop complaining about it if you wont do anything about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Tashi, 17 Oct 2006 @ 8:24pm

That's why I haven't bought a CD since 2000. I have my own digital studio and I use my own music for all my projects, from the web to my amateur films.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
discojohnson, 18 Oct 2006 @ 8:21am

real reason is....
....precidence. it's easier to knock over a giant after you've beat up his posse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
********** *********, 1 Nov 2006 @ 11:05am

Pissed off local
This sucks dick!!! Why the fuck are these fagots always trying to censor the good shit? Come on!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jeffrey, 1 Nov 2006 @ 11:08am
  
  Re: Pissed off local
  Hey, your right... Not just about the censorship, but by what these people are trying to do to our entertainment or fun.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Jeffrey, 1 Nov 2006 @ 11:08am
  
  Re: Pissed off local
  Hey, your right... Not just about the censorship, but by what these people are trying to do to our entertainment or fun.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
yema, 16 Jan 2007 @ 9:03am

DONT CARE
SHUT UP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Steven Ying, 24 Apr 2008 @ 6:13pm

Value of Youtube
I came across this video on youtube called how much is your favourite video site worth??... its crazy if you look at their prices, its insane.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=74gWUznqbTQ
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Emad hassan kenona, 16 May 2008 @ 6:43am

We pleased by youtube the videos are clear and free
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ed Magik, 12 Dec 2008 @ 6:08am

My Thoughts...
Since the Internet is reaching into more homes, or should I say more homes are reaching to the Internet for entertainment, both record companies and movie studios have taken some big hits on profits. Sales are down so much that record stores like Tower, for example went out of business, along with mom and pop type stores, and other chains stores are consolidating. People are leaning towards buying on-line or making illegal digital copies of music and movie products.

Also in-play is the big super-stores like Walmart. They have forced a lot of record stores out of business.

The record labels now only focus on the music superstars and all the other signed talent's music gets shelved for a tax write-off.

This whole thing is helping independent recording artists because people aren't buying into the cookie-cutter music that the big record companies are putting out.

I'm not surprised that the UMG is going after folks.
They are scrambling to make profit in a changing environment where Internet media is becoming the main product of consumer choice, and they didn't plan for it to happen so quickly.

# # #
[ link to this | view in chronology ]