Allofmp3 Experiments With Free Content... But Wraps It In DRM
from the sorta,-but-not-quite dept
Yesterday, Allofmp3 got a ton of press for holding a press conference defending its legality and business model. So why is it changing all of that? That's not entirely clear. A few people have submitted a NY Times piece that highlights Allofmp3's plans to "give away" lots of music supported by ads. Plenty of people are picking up on this story, while focusing in on the part of the article that claims Visa has yanked its support of the site as the reason why Allofmp3 is suddenly shifted to a free, ad-supported model. However, that's not at all clear from the article. The NY Times article is pretty poorly written. It mentions the Visa thing, but keeps it entirely separate from the free music section -- suggesting that these may actually be unrelated events (in fact, it almost sounds like Visa decided to pull its service to the site after the announcement of the free music). Secondly, the ad supported offering doesn't really sound all that impressive. Part of the reason people like Allofmp3 is because it gives them totally unencumbered files in whatever format works best for the buyer. That is, they can do whatever they want with those files, from playing them on iPods to making copies of them for multiple computers or whatever. However, the new offering, not unlike some of the plans the record labels are supporting, requires people to listen to music in specific players where the ads will be shown, and won't let you copy the files to more than one computer. Obviously, that's about the only way to get the advertising to work, but it also decreases the value of the music since people can't do much with it. So, it may be free, but it brings back the DRM and the limitations. There are plenty of us who would prefer to pay for unencumbered music, than to get copy protected music for free.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
...as for an iPod/any mp3 player, what do you expect for (legally) free?
Can you burn the free music to a CD? If you can, then you can just re-rip it onto your computer DRM free (not using iTunes). That's what I do with iTunes stuff.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Some of this is the result of legislation (online gambling). To the extent Visa or any other credit card company starts limiting where it's customers may use it they are making *their* product less valuable.
Visa shouldn't be in the censorship business, it isn't good for their business.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
visa is for whores
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That said because of the arcane credit laws (thank you, south dakota) Visa, Mc, Amex, Novus etc will never ever face any liability for their complete inaction in protecting consumers from id theft.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If people avoid the "free but DRM-encumbered" music but continue buying (and paying for) the plain mp3 downloads, you think the music industry might get a clue that our dislike of DRM is not just about getting stuff for free? Somehow I doubt it..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: So...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
huh
"unlike some plans of the plans the record labels are supporting"
What what what
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yeah, I noticed...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Or just use Bittorrent.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
stream mp3 > redirect to recording device
or just use bittorrent, limewire, dc++, etc =)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
This isn't really a big deal at all. While you may not be able to pay allofmp3.com directly with your Visa you will just go to another site not directly affiliated with allofmp3.com where you will buy "points" that can be spent at sites such as allofmp3.com.
And BTW, best quote of the article.
"So, it may be free, but it brings back the DRM and the limitations. There are plenty of us who would prefer to pay for unencumbered music, than to get copy protected music for free."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Can't beat "almost free" and "dirt cheap" no matter if you have DRM or not. "Encumbered by DRM" is probably the most goofiest excuse people use these days for complaining and pirating music (and in some cases, paying to pirate music). Back in the day, people didn't call "radio" DRM... they just got off their fat asses and hit the "record" button on their cassette tapes. These days, the record button is in Audacity (or any number of other one-press wave recording programs). --Making that personal recording is fair use. Paying someone else to do it, like AllofMp3, is piracy. Sounds real simple until you begin the delicate rationalization process that makes capitalism and the free market out to be the scourge of the universe.
All you zombies out there... say it to yourself... just because piracy is a "competitive force" to adjust for, doesn't mean that the publisher can afford to attempt to "out price" a pirate. They can only attempt a collection of disincentives and apply triage. At the end of the day, those same customers Best Buy has begun calling a "lost cause", are the same ones publishers have to "write off" as "will never buy from me for any price or condition". It's human nature to try to screw people out of their due and get a deal. Why people dress this up, as concerns music (stories: musicians don't need the money or get much anyway, the industry is evil and always will be, i'm sending a message), I'll never know.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Simple.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]