Educators Debate Taking The Blood And Explosions Out Of Science
from the no-fun dept
Can computers and the internet be used to simulate a lab in an educational setting? This is the subject of an emerging debate, as more classrooms opt to forego real lab equipment, in favor of virtual replications. So instead of carving up a frog with a scalpel, a student can use their mouse to do the same thing. Those in favor of the practice note its cost savings and the fact that students trained this way have shown strong scores on standardized science tests. The predictable response is that virtual training is no substitute for the real world. And there may be something to this charge. The antiseptic virtual environment can't train a student to properly care for lab equipment, take proper safety measure, or deal with unexpected events that may occur in the process. For anyone who might go on to do science academically or professionally, these are vital skills. Another dynamic at play here is the ongoing assault on anything that might be dangerous. This summer, Wired had an excellent piece about how new regulations make it difficult to obtain basic chemistry sets, and other scientific equipment that could be "dangerous to children". Of course, by eliminating the possibility of a child ever being in the presence of a chemical explosion, you eliminate much of what makes a kid want to be a scientist. If you take the blood and guts out of dissection, then you're basically just playing puzzle. While computers can be a great educational tool, with endless possibilities in the sciences, it seems that kids are missing out by eliminating the real-world experience.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
However, think when I was in highschool I would have welcomed computer simulation. We disected, worms, mice, rats, fish, cows eyes and pigs. All the while I was gagging on the formadelhyde. So, for HS sims are okay. If someone wants to persue a biological degreee at college then that is the place where they should get knee-deep in guts.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
the danger of overprotection
Protect kids from the truly dangerous things, but allow them to learn and grow - and experience (read: mistakes and their aftermath) is the best teacher.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And what...
Most soldiers will say that while training is great it still doesn't fully prepare you for actual combat.
And besides without actual lab gear we wouldn't have anywhere as many superheroes...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
take physics, how can you do free fall measurements or gravity effects? a computer would either give you a "perfect" answer, or a standard random answer (i.e. everyon got the same wrong answer) the best times we had, was wen one groups expierment went completly haywire, and they tried to figure it out, then the rest of the class tried, then the teacher stepped in. oops, i started measuring at the 20 mark and forgot to subtract the 20 extra units doh! real labs have real value. teach you more than the "theory" behind the lab. they teach you to understand we don't live in a perfect world. they teach how to overcome obsticals and spot mistakes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Blood, guts and explosions
Moreover, kids need to learn what an acceptable risk is. Sometimes the best solution to avoid getting hurt falling from high up is to learn not to fall. kids need to break an arm at least once, get a skined knee and a dirty nose.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Pro/Con?
Unfortunately, there's also not the learning experience of having spilled the acid on a classmate, and the potential consequences of such an action (In my case, laughing my ass off at the guy who has red, itchy arms for the rest of the day after I spilled the acid on him).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: And what...
In my HS, part of our educational experience included a trip to the morgue to view a autopsy. Now, I don't know how many people have had this experience but I can bet for sure that anyone who is going to be freaked out by carving into a dead animal isn't going to be any better off when they wade through human intestines the first time.
What did I gain from this and the multitude of animal dissections? Well, I'm comfortable using a scalpel, but blood still freaks me out. Seeing the organs just gave me nightmares and I'm no more likely to enter the medical profession than I was before bio class. I was required to take the class, it's done and I'm never taking biology again!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That's like learning to fight evil wizzards from r
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: And what...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Come on its ridiculus
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Medical School
of history: until "real" medical schools were established
in the United States (late in the 19th century,
and early 20th) the great majority of
medical students received an
MD without ever seeing or touching a patient.
They rarely if ever participated in cadaver study.
I like the idea of mixed experience where people
should use the simulator AND have hands-on
experience. Same with currently-practicing
doctors and surgeons, since that will help them with
new techniques.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Animal Experiments
We ought to have enough respect for life, any life, that we don't throw it away wantonly.
Don't get me wrong though, I'm all for animal experiments when it comes to finding cures for diseases, etc. People who select this field of study must of course also be allowed training, but very few in High School have selected a field yet, so it seems natural, at least to me, to hold off on disection in the classroom until sophomore year in college.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Animal Experiments
And what happens to the poor kid who decided to follow that career, performs his first dissection at the end of the education process, and finds out it's not for him?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Animal Experiments
If you are very seriously telling me that cutting up a dead animal will be the deciding factor on whether you become a doctor/scientist then you are a fucking retard.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Virtual everything
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Virtual everything
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Everyone knows
[ link to this | view in thread ]