MySpace: Music Is For Selling, Not Sharing
from the that-sounds-smart dept
Is it possible for user-submitted media sites to take a draconian approach to copyrighted material while also remaining cool? Trying to balance these two objectives has led to the death of services like Napster, and it's now being faced by the likes of YouTube and MySpace. To this end, MySpace has licensed technology from Gracenote that supposedly can identify uploaded songs to see whether they're copyrighted. Users often upload their favorite songs to their page that automatically start playing when a visitor goes there. It happens to be one of MySpace's most popular and irritating features. Part of the reason the company wants to crack down on this is because it's planning on offering its own music store, which will sell these same songs from major bands. Supposing the technology even worked effectively, which it never has in the past, it's hard to see what the company is thinking. Eliminating one of its core social features just so it can support its music store is really short sighted. Why does it want to turn itself into yet another underdog iTunes competitor? Already, the site is battling to retain its ever-fickle youth demographic; making the site less cool will only hasten the move to freer pastures, where harmless activities like posting songs to a website will be tolerated.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Can you say...
Nice job MySpace.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not MySpace's fault...
This is not MySpace's fault, nor are the pastures free. Any service that gathers enough users will present itself as a target.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Maybe
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Haha...
As far as I know, they'll have to stop people from embedding content in their pages if they want to completely stop this 'music issue'. Until then, anyone who really wants to can still have whatever music or video they'd like right there on their MySpace page.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Marketing for dummies
Think about the possibilities, I visit someone's site and they are playing a cool tune, I love, I find out who did it and I buy it - or is someone fearful that I will just bookmark the site and everytime I want to hear it I will visit the site in hopes that the site's owner hasn't grown tired of the song and changed it?
To the best of my knowledge my Zune will not be able to pick up the signal off an embedded page....Unless this Zune is gonna have some far-out uninvented RF capability we haven't heard of!
The fear mongering at record companies and digital media distributors is so far off the mark it scares the hell out of me, albeit it makes me better understand why so many crap artists get record deals and the best music remains independant!!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yessss
Sure this is only somewhat related. But man ... I really hate having to always keep my computer on mute when I visit myspace.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
however, the mp3s are better because the quality is better. however they both have features that allow mutes and whatnot.
ohwell.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Can you say...
"Users often upload their favorite songs to their page that automatically start playing when a visitor goes there. "
So, let me get this straight: so they're going to start removing the 9 different songs that start playing on people's
MySpace page as you open it up? Wow! If only they could remove their ugly mugs and strip the bastardized, radiation sick cousin's of CSS and HTML from everyone's profiles and we'd be all set.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
trUe
[ link to this | view in thread ]
you are misunderstanding how music works on myspac
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ehh
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Yessss
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ok
[ link to this | view in thread ]
article is all wrong
the music accounts on myspace are for musicians. almost every major band has an account and myspace alllows users to play the songs that the bands themselves put on the site. the bands choose which songs they want to let the fans share, and the fans on myspace can share them.
from the beginning myspace has deleted fake music accounts. now they're just using a new technology to help them detect them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
yall bunch of myspace nerds... get a life fucking WEZO's
[ link to this | view in thread ]
MySpace music embedding
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Haha...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
jab
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not MySpace's fault...
i been done for copyrite shit
and i haven't done bollocks
now NONE of my music players will show up on ANY site.
wtf. ? anti theft method?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Haha...
Thanks,
Currie Johnson
[ link to this | view in thread ]
BS
[ link to this | view in thread ]
need help!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This article
Being an ISP tech though, MySpace probably doesn't have that much choice here. The music industry would do this anyway, even as a hoster you are responsible to respond to takedown notices from the copyright holder. They would likely use this tech as much as they could, but then MySpace would be responsible for manually going after them (there is no requirement that a takedown notice be sent in a manner that can be automated - it can even be a fax or letter) should the industry choose to get vicious (The music industry being the slightest bit underhanded in hunting online music? Nahh.. That never happens).
It's true that the rules differ somewhat for broadcasts (both net and otherwise), but that's not at all a free for all - royalties still have to be payed at a lower rate by a complex set of rules I doubt many (if any) MySpace pages are obeying or even understand.
One would think the music industry would be better served by the exposure then hurt by potential lack of sales due to listening, but bottom line it is their work and that's for them to decide. They're sure not shy about trying to get on radio playlists and eventually they'll probably get around to tapping this market advantage as well or do so more constructively and with less paranoia. But, I reiterate, that's the law and nearly always has been. You make music, you get to decide what and how you intend to get paid or, as the case may be, not paid and where it can be used beyond Fair Use.
[ link to this | view in thread ]