New Studies Suggest On Screen Porn And Violence Reduce Real Rape And Violence
from the more-research-needed dept
I'll be the first to say that this clearly needs to have more research done to support these findings, and there are plenty of questions raised by them, but Slate is reporting on two new bits of research that suggest that online porn reduces rape, and movie violence reduces real violence. The first study looked at the incidents of rape in areas where internet access was prevalent, and found a meaningful drop, even after controlling for "alcohol consumption, police presence, poverty and unemployment rates, population density, and so forth." The report looks at whether it might be other online content, but notes that the internet doesn't impact homicide rates in the same way. In other words, it's only rape that's decreased by internet access. The researcher also notes that it's probably not due to dating sites either, as the effect is most noticeable in those 15 to 19 years old, the least likely to use dating services. The second study finds that crime rates tend to go down following the release of violent movies. Not just following the release, but literally, during the period of night when movies are most popularly shown -- if there's a new violent movie, crime rates tend to drop. This follows throughout the night, and crime rates only pick up again the next morning. The theory here is that if violent criminals are at the theater, they're not out being violent. The reason it lasts well afterwards (the theory goes) is that the violent types are eating popcorn and drinking soda... rather than alcohol, while watching the movie. It's no secret that people have pointed out that these types of activities can often act as a "valve" to release anger, rather than bottle it up until it comes out in a more damaging way. While these two studies are hardly proof (and more research needs to back these findings up), it does suggest that perhaps there's some truth behind those claims.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Take that, Jack Thompson!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You're Kidding Me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Funny
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Funny
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Funny
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Funny
2. I would disagree with this entirely. I think that the direct cause of the violence was the nut job father.
3. Was the video game in question violent?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Funny
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Funny
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny
Golly, maybe the answer is to take everyone of the these religious moral crusaders on a space shuttle, send them to the moon...let them battle it out in a grand war of morality...just until the winner is left standing...bring him back to earth and upon landing...SHOOT HIM IN THE FRICKIN HEAD :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Violent movies and games are not a valve to release pent-up anger. At best they pacify you for the same reasons that heartbeats drop when watching TV - it's passive entertainment. Of course violent people will enjoy violent movies and won't be committing crimes while watching them. Since when does this pass for scientific results? It's basic logic.
If you want to find out WHO all these people are, check crime rates during significant Nascar events or World Wrestling Federation pay-per-views (though the effect will not be as pronounced in poorer areas that can't afford $40 pay-per-view events. Use Monday Night Raw as a suitable replacement as needed.)
Select whatever type of media or events are suitable to whoever you want to study, like 50-Cent concerts, asian cinema, new World of Warcraft add-on releases, whatever. Then you can actually tell us something useful, like who's committing most of the crimes so that we can tap their phones, or better, pre-emptively arrest all of them.
If you have purchased a pay-per-view Wrestling event in the past 360 days, please report to your nearest Wellness (Detention) Center for Society Re-Education (Reprogramming).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I disagree that video games can be considered passive entertainment. It is very active. With TV and movies indeed all you do is watch, but with video games it's YOU how controls the character. So you can't possibly call it passive entertainment.
BTW, I love the Die Hard movies (just to take an example), but I can not be considered a violent man, not by a long shot.
I also like to play first person shooters as a valve to shoot away any frustrations I might get at work. But I've yet to fire a real gun, and I don't intend to change that any time soon.
Which is safer? Acting out frustrations on a bunch of pixels or on a live person?
You can't tell me, that I'm alone in this!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
;-)
-Nick
Candles | Perfumes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Actually.. that idea has some merit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where there is internet acess, we are talking about middle class to upper class citizens. That doesnt mean the % of rape or volence is any lower in reality. It just shows that with money and education, there is less violence and rape. If the areas were just educated, rather than looking at porn and playing violent video games, im sure things would be diffrent. Because lets face it, everyone has played a violent video game, and more than half of teen boys have seen pornography, probably more than that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Except that the study controlled for all of those things... So your point doesn't hold. It found that even when you controlled for those things, the number of rapes went down.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
p.s. do your really think there is a "gangsta houze" that is tech free, you must be insane, they'd go nuts without their grand theft auto
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Demographic studies are useless
For example, just because Internet access is available in an area does not mean people are using the Internet to view pornography.
To establish a cause and effect relationship, you must not just note coincident timing. If you tested a group of known rapists and/or criminals and see if their criminal habits changed when exposed to violent movies or pornography, then perhaps there would be matter to discuss.
Most people who make factual assessments from pseudo-science studies like this are just looking for excuses to support their preconceived notions.
Secondly, ethical journalism always provides the source of survey results. Slate, I presume, merely republished these results. Who was the researcher and the financial sponsor of the research?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Demographic studies are useless
Perhaps.
For example, just because Internet access is available in an area does not mean people are using the Internet to view pornography.
Absolutely true, though the report does try to explain how it came to its conclusion.
To establish a cause and effect relationship, you must not just note coincident timing. If you tested a group of known rapists and/or criminals and see if their criminal habits changed when exposed to violent movies or pornography, then perhaps there would be matter to discuss.
Indeed, which is why more research is needed.
Most people who make factual assessments from pseudo-science studies like this are just looking for excuses to support their preconceived notions.
See comment above.
Secondly, ethical journalism always provides the source of survey results. Slate, I presume, merely republished these results. Who was the researcher and the financial sponsor of the research?
You can find the links in the Slate article.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Yeah, thats unbiased.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
This is a good review? I say repeatedly that more research needs to be done and that there are questions raised by them.
However, the reasoning makes sense. The reasoning in the other studies didn't make sense. Is it because of bias? Perhaps. But no one seems to be coming up with a convincing explanation for these results otherwise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ture
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh Good
Interesting survey, but I think more research is needed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Are criteria is so low...
I would rather have responsible members of society who spend their time investing in greater causes (fighting poverty, caring for their children, curing diseases, caring for elderly neighbors, wisely governing, etc.). That too would reduce rape and violent crime.
Sitting in a room privately satisfying your animal passions does nothing positive for our society. In fact, we seem to be losing a generation of young people to the lure of this nonsense.
Give me a civil society where young men and women have loftier goals and want more from their lives. Violent movies and pornography are certainly not the way to obtain that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Are criteria is so low...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Violence in Japan
And yet, in Japan, violence is much much lower than here in the States.
No surprises, when you supress things, people act out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
All I hear are agruments on how things like violent video games and movies corrupt our youth, and I'm tired of it. If enough people see statistics like these, we can sleep soundly at night knowing our rights are protected and our streets are safer.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Heres the deal. DON'T RELY ON ANY STUDY LIKE THIS. And I mean this for both sides of the argument. People spend way too much time trying to relate morals to media. They are two tottally separate things, and we don't know how the human minds works completley to make such strong assumptions and corellations.
I am prefectly okay with saying this argument is probably as biased as the arguments against violent media. But whatever the statistics say, people are different.
There are many posts above where people admit to using these things as a "valve" for stress. Others say that doing things like these are not productive and don't help you in the long run. Either way it doesen't matter. It a question of personal freedom.
I play plenty of violent videogames, but not becuase I need to vent stress or am angry at the world. If I was, I still probably woulden't use violent media as an outlet for my rage. I play games and watch movies purley for entertainemnt. Regardless of how much fun I have blasting heads in video games, watching geysers of blood spew in Kill Bill, and whacking it looking at dirty pictures on the internet, I still am the same person before and after, and my world view does not change. The only reason I may feel relieved of stress is purley becuase it is a relaxing activity I enjoy doing, not unlike reading a book or doing tai chi or something.
As stated before, people react to and "use" different forms of media in different ways. Artcicles packed with statistics and massive studies don't have as much merit and signifcance as they are said to by liberals and evenagelical christians alike.
Besides, most of the problem is just the huge generation gap combined with the ever increasing rate at which technology is falling into the hands of "impressionable" youngsters.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
art&crafts
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Two Way Radio Battery
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alinco Radio Batteries
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I have an opinion or is it fact from an expert
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Porn reduces rape fallacy
Another problem with the idea that porn reduces rape is that it completely misunderstands what rape actually is. Rape has nothing to do with sex or sexual release. It is the violent, brutal exercise of power of one human being over another. Free speech has never been entirely protected. Your right to free speech and expression ends where it violates the rights of another human being, particularly the right to be free from violence and worse.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Porn reduces rape fallacy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
request more info
Thankyou ^^
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]