This Ad Not Approved By The Candidate, Therefore We Can Say Whatever The Hell We Want

from the attack-2.0 dept

Wed, Nov 1st 2006 8:55am — Joseph Weisenthal

Most political attack ads look about the same: blurry picture of the candidate, out-of-context quote on the screen and foreboding music. Yet even though you'd think we'd be immune to them by now, since we've seen so many, they remain the bread and butter of American political races. Well, the attack ad is becoming the latest form of media to go down the user-created route. A new site lets anyone create them using stock video footage, and an easy drag-and-drop editing system. Users can then add text and music, to give it just the right touch. And though it might seem pointless, there could be a useful purpose of web-based supporter-created ads. In typical TV-based ads, candidates like to hit on the big issues of the day, so that their message resonates with most of the viewers, giving them the most bang for the buck. A 30 second spot doesn't leave much room for issues that appeal to small niche of voters, like, say, the gambling ban or a politician's stance on net neutrality. But just as the internet helps expand long tail possibilities in many other areas, so too could it in political advertising. There's another reason why this kind of thing might take off. Often, there are some topics that a candidate just won't touch in an ad, like if their opponent had some very embarrassing personal incident. Going after that usually just makes the attacking candidate look bad. But when fringe third parties can do the advertising, candidates can distance themselves from the attack -- triangulating, as they call it. So from this angle, cheap technology to make and distribute ads may pave the way for a new level of political nastiness.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

7 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

dorpus, 1 Nov 2006 @ 9:03am

Asian style sabotage?
In Japan/Korea, internet activists like publishing personal details of people in the media spotlight -- their phone numbers, addresses, medical records, detailed information about their family and employees, etc. Quite a few politicians and celebrities have had their reputations ruined this way. Some web sites also give tips on how to sabotage the mainstream media by heckling journalists or passing on false information. American hacktivism strikes me as relatively tame by comparison.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Anonymous Coward, 1 Nov 2006 @ 10:41am
  
  Re: Asian style sabotage?
  are you saying that unlike in America (as this article is referring to) & many other countries, respect for others and basic human decently does not exist in Japan?
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Asia's Awesomeness Abounds!, 1 Nov 2006 @ 12:02pm

Ruin Republicans Racketeering Reputations
If Americans could get away with such activities a new industry trend will flourish, much the same way reality tv took off. Although I wouldn't want strangers to have info on me that I didn't have. Dentists, doctors, FBI, etc don't share what they have on me to me and that is cause for concern! Secrets, secrets...
Politicians are scum, no decent person would even try to to go through that nonsense. Only those persons who can keep their mind on the jackpot that is taxpayer's earnings can endure the bullshit long enough to win the election.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sanguine Dream, 1 Nov 2006 @ 12:33pm

So now...
is the time to be taken on as a volunteer in someone's political campaign. I say volunteer and not hire because (I think) it would be a little harder to trace back to a volunteer than a on the books employee.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Saragon, 1 Nov 2006 @ 12:37pm

Not to mention its teaching potential
It's a staple of the educational system: Doing teaches much more than watching. Teachers know this; that's why interactive teaching is so important in the classroom. Same rules apply here. This drag-and-drop, create-your-own advertising doesn't just hit niches -- it gives people time (and time far beyond the usual 30 seconds of a TV ad) to really learn and listen to the gory details of an opponent's negative talking points. Someone who's made their own ad focusing on a couple of points will have internalized those points -- and others passed over -- much more than someone who has to sit through a 30-second TV spot that's interrupting the new "Lost" episode.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 1 Nov 2006 @ 1:16pm

I know this will never happen but I would like to someday see a mud-slinging free race. One where oponents appear in the same ad, with what they've voted on, their main promises for the coming term they are running for and then leave it to the voters to decide who's best for the job this time around.

If only honesty and decency could prevail in one election of significance, I would be a happy camper.

Sadly this won't happen until I destroy mankind and rebuild it in my image...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
shableep, 1 Nov 2006 @ 1:44pm

Honesty can easily sound like "mud-slinging" sometimes.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]