Disney Following The Content-Based MVNO Model: Hype, Slash Prices, Fail
from the it's-in-the-book dept
Our Spidey senses detect a pattern here: MVNO launches and announces a bunch of exciting new non-voice services that it says justify its premium prices, and it gets a whole lot of hype but few actual subscribers. Then, a few months later, it cuts its prices in a desperate attempt to gain users, before later going out of business or retooling its business model. Amp'd? Launch hype, check. price cuts, check. New business model? Check. Mobile ESPN: high-priced launch, then the price cuts, then, of course, failure. It's not clear if Disney learned anything from that debacle, having surged full speed ahead with its Disney Mobile MVNO for paranoid parents, even when the writing was on the wall for Mobile ESPN. Given the pattern, it's hardly surprising to see Disney cutting its handset prices to try and attract more users. The company says it's part of a holiday-season promotion -- perhaps calling it a final-throw-of-the-dice promotion wasn't too attractive. It's getting increasingly difficult to understand why these sorts of companies think that they'll be able to lure users to their dedicated mobile services, and why that's a better idea than doing what they've always done -- be content providers and sell their content to whoever wants it.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It's not too diffucult...
It's getting increasingly difficult to understand why these sorts of companies think that they'll be able to lure users to their dedicated mobile services, and why that's a better idea than doing what they've always done -- be content providers and sell their content to whoever wants it.
There is one simple answer to that...greed. Disney, ESPN and the others want their hands in every cookie jar they can reach. It was calculated that by offering their own service they could make more money. Why share the profit with (insert name of cell service provider) when they can keep it all to themsleves.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Duhh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
funny
I guess they followed the Slashdot way, but forgot about what to replace the ??? with:
1) Release an expensive service
2) Cut prices
3) ???
4) Profit?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Conventional Wisdom
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Piggy backing on a major carrier on a first place? check
"premium" content that only means premium price? check
Forced content through orifice? check
Maybe they are all looking at Korea, but I'm willing to wager that in the US, for most people, most of the time, a cell phone is just a cell phone: place and receive calls. Preferably loudly in the next cube, in restaurants, movie theatres, while driving.
Let me pay more for extra 10fps clips to be watched on a 96x96 pixel color screen? check
Yep, that's a real winner.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NoMorePoints.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]