Forgent Settles Patent Case; Ends Up With Over $100 Million For No Innovation

from the and-who-wins?-the-lawyers dept

Remember Forgent Networks? This is the company that had acquired a bunch of assets, including some patents, and later, while looking at them decided that one of those patents might retroactively cover JPEG image compression technology -- despite the fact that they, and the original creators of the patent, had absolutely nothing to do with the actual technology. They went on a licensing spree that pissed off a bunch of companies who saw it as a perfect example of abusing the patent system. It wasn't helping anyone except for a company that had absolutely nothing to do with the technology in question at all. Even as people found prior art Forgent kept convincing companies to license the patent, as it was often cheaper to license than to fight it. Earlier this year, the Patent Office agreed to review the patent and indicated that they had some questions about how valid it really was. There's still a long process following that, and initial skepticism doesn't mean that the patent won't eventually be upheld, but it appears Forgent saw the writing on the wall and decided that it was a good time to cash out. They've now settled all the remaining claims they filed using that patent for $8 million -- which is significantly less than they had hoped to get. Still, in the end the company managed to get well over $100 million out of a variety of companies without doing the slightest bit of innovation.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    PhysicsGuy, 1 Nov 2006 @ 6:26pm

    never have an egg salad sandwich and then take a nap... horrible gas...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    XCetron, 1 Nov 2006 @ 6:57pm

    This is the first blog I've seen on Techdirt that is related to Patenting things and the patient office wasnt the main target of the criticism. But according to this at least theyre smart enough to question that patient instead of just letting it sit there.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Nov 2006 @ 6:58pm

    HEY, I patented the non-napping post-egg salad sandwich algorithm. Pay me or I'm calling my lawyer.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Smooth Jazz Fusion, 1 Nov 2006 @ 7:05pm

    Prior Art

    I'm going to find a way to redirect air through the gastro intestinal tract and call it a Fart Redirector. Anyone want to license it?

    Come to think of it I'm coming after everyone that farts. Regardless of your prior art, or fart.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Nov 2006 @ 7:41pm

    If they made patents more like trademark, it would be much better. Like, you have to pursue active infringement when it happens, not later. You wouldn't have this, and you wouldn't have crap like the Rambus debacle.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    slimcat (profile), 1 Nov 2006 @ 9:00pm

    No way Smooth Jazz

    Your Fart Redirector patent is blocking my Butt Horn patent. I'm suing.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Joe Smith, 1 Nov 2006 @ 9:46pm

    Re: Prior Art

    "Fart Redirector"

    If you go see the movie Jackass 2 you'll find out there is already prior art.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.