Why ISPs Should Demand To See A Warrant Before Handing Over Customer Information
from the protecting-privacy dept
For some time, law enforcement has been trying to put more pressure on ISPs to crack down and monitor the behavior of their customers. In some cases, lawmakers have tried to pin liability on ISPs, which is rather misguided since the ISP is not the culpable party. In Canada, officials are upset at some ISPs for a perceived lack of cooperation when it comes to investigations of sex criminals use the web. What it boils down to is that ISPs don't want to give out personal information on their customers without a warrant. Meanwhile, investigators think it's a ridiculous demand to have to get a warrant every time they need information. Some might wonder why the ISPs are adamant on this issue, particularly since they are in a position to help out in a serious issue, and they're not being asked to shoulder a major burden. But requiring a warrant is a check against abuse; without them it's hard for ISPs to judge the legitimacy and seriousness of a request. By valuing privacy, they better serve their customers, and ensure that law enforcement is only pursuing cases within the scope of the law.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
ISPs are
This isn't just a matter of protecting the privacy of these individuals but also a matter of due process. Would you rather ask for a warrant so the sex offender gets another day or two while the warrant is procured, or would you rather that the sex offender never sees jail because the judge tosses out the case since the information on them was not legally obtained? I'd rather see those pervs going straight to jail then get off on technicalities.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
ISPs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
gimme a break
I have to laugh (to avoid crying) whenever I see something like this: law enforcement wanting to lower the barrier to accessing information in the name of , in this instance, "saving the children. " There are very good reasons these rules exist. Eroding our rights and protections over a false issue such as the inconvienience in obtaining warrants is ridiculous and scary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Badges? we don't need no stinkn badges!
Due process is top on priority, but could there be an alternative process to take into account a time sensitve issue?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Badges? we don't need no stinkn badges!
Due process is top on priority, but could there be an alternative process to take into account a time sensitve issue?"
If a warrant is not required, what is to stop the perv that is soliciting sex from a 13 year old from calling the ISP and getting the address of the 13 year old 'because he is a law enforcemnt officer and needs to bust this guy now' (assuming the 13 year old is smart enough to not give out their address).
There is a reason for due process, if there were no restrictions, the informaiton would be freely available to anyone who wanted to abuse the system.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'm from law enforcement
Either way, its not so bad here in Adelaide, either the ISp are good and will ask for a warrant, and probalby argue about it anyway, then be creatively incompetent and not hand over anything, or they are so hopeless that it makes no odds what they do, since the data is both wrong and six months late.
Internode is the only one who would cooperate, and they would still demand a warrant or court order, but wiould hand over accurate data on time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Legal system for a reason
There is just way too much abuse right now and people's rights are being tossed out the door, simply because the legal system has gotten lazy and they want supreme power to do anything they want. Innocent people have rights too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
|3331373|3|_||3 needs a spellchecker
If the ISP and/or Police Dept require a decoder ring to decipher what the hell you wrote, it's going to take a lot longer to process.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Law enforcement: make sure the law is applied
Judicial branch: interpret the law and apply to concrete cases.
The reason to need a warrant is to make sure the law enforcement part got their things right and there is sufficient suspicion that a law is broken (remember, only the judges can tell you if the law is broken, the law enforcement can only bring someone before a judge)
If you don't need a warrant to ransack through ISP records (because there is no difference between requesting one address vs 7,500) then you don't need judges anymore. The country will be happily run by cops that will go from arresting you to carrying sentences (do not pass through the courthouse ,there is no judgement per se)
Clearly we're better off maintaining those separations where all the power does not fall into too few hands.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]