Offshoring Probably The Least Of Journalists' Concerns
from the piling-on dept
At some point or another workers in almost any field wonder whether outsourcing labor will affect their industry. The latest to get attention for coming under the gun are journalists, worried that major news organizations are increasingly hiring writers in India and elsewhere to write American news stories. The trend makes sense considering that so much of what newswires put out are hastily repackaged press releases and earnings reports that don't require much training. But beyond that, it's important to remember that the situation is not a zero-sum game. There's no fixed supply of journalistic output. Hiring more writers allows these companies to cover more news, and it allows the better-trained writers to do other things. It's the same with stories about automating financial journalism, which should allow people with skills to use them for something more productive. Worried workers might want to take a look at the tech industry, where the threat of offshore labor never materialized. However, it's obviously not a great time to be a journalist at many newspapers, but that has much more to do with the overall economics of the industry, and the problems those companies are having, rather than any threat (real or perceived) from foreign journalists.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
What is a journalist these days anyway?
There are clearly two distinct classes of journalist, rather like the rap artists I've just been reading about who use samples, and real musicians who write and perform songs. The first class journalists are also reporters, or work closely with them. They collect new stories as eyewitness accounts, do investigative work, make phone calls. Then you have the aggregators, commentators, bloggers and special interest portals forming the second class. Sure, the second class journalists do write material (this techdirt.com site is a great example of well written provocative summaries that add some value - at least more than slashdot), but it is only a meta-discourse on the content they trade.The second class are merely an unwitting distribution channel for the first.There are two other primary sources that are best not called "journalism" for many reasons. The first of these is the real web, the true online gestalt sphere from which stories can and do emerge quite independently, and the second is an old player known as government who have always written news stories but have rarely been so brazen and open about the way they manipulate and manufacture concensual news as they are today.
The notion of a "journalist", and where they work is not as important as the source of the story and the motivation for it. Many so called journalists and news sites do not properly filter their sources or follow back the source and motive, ironic because that is their only job, so they don't add value. Look at the difference between Slashdot on a week where a good editor is filtering and a bad week when it's a slew of vague FUD stories and nebulous hearsay from quack commentators and industry shills. The only way a journalist can *add value* to an aggregate is by imbuing it with their personality, by having a position, an opinion and a motive to filter and search. You won't get Indians working at a few bucks an hour to do that, you may as well write some Perl scripts to summarise other peoples news feeds and change a few words.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My heart bleeds for the overeducated liberal media
Now that the chickens have come home to roost and the journalists are being outsourced, I say f-- all of them. Let the upper middle and privileged classes find out what it means to have your own American-based company stab you in the back with a cold ice pick.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
C|NET outsourced content jobs already
It wasn't that long ago that CNET shafted its staff when i decided to outource its dev news.
here's the proof: http://www.newsforge.com/trends/04/03/18/2240229.shtml
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Offshoring Probably The Least Of Journalists' Conc
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Long Term
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Long Term
I know that this is far fetched but imagine having no entry level jobs in a given field. You can't get into the upper level jobs without entry level work experience. But you can't find an entry level position because of outsourcing. How do you get into that field?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Outsourcing can be a good thing?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My heart bleeds for the overeducated liberal media
The mainstream media (with the notable exception of CNN's Lou Dobbs) sat quietly and said nothing over the past six years as my industry was outsourced to India, China and God knows what other third-world nation. I was the first person among all my friends and co-workers to hear and use the word 'outsourcing' and I read it in an industry (computer networking) trade magazine back in the summer of 2000.
Now that the chickens have come home to roost and the journalists are being outsourced, I say f-- all of them. Let the upper middle and privileged classes find out what it means to have your own American-based company stab you in the back with a cold ice pick."
I have t agree with her. i am in the same boat as him, the only difference is that I also do computer hardware onsite and remote. That means that only part of my job is protected maybe to a degree and even then with bare minimum wages.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
its all about choices
www.thatpoliticalblog.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Journo Jobs could move
I think it's fair to say that most reporters do most of their work via email and phone, both of which are available in India.
Three years ago when people first started paying serious attention to Silicon Valley programming jobs that were being outsourced to India, defenders of the practice said, "don't worry, it's only the lesser skilled, more mundane jobs." But what happened? Now the Indians are tackling even the most sophisticated jobs. Kudos to them for their hard work.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
PR jobs could move too
To my fellow PR people out there, the future of your career will depend upon you adding serious value with your communications skills, your strategic insight, your relationships, your results, and your geographic proximity to clients and media.
With media moving to India, it's only a matter of time before PR agencies begin adding staffers in India to deal exclusively with the offshored reporters writing stories about US clients.
To agencies out there who continue to ravage clients with exhorbitant billing practices, you'll be first in line for obsolesence once clients realize they have more efficient alternatives both at home and abroad.
All of us in professional services industries need to take the offshoring threat seriously. Many of us are more disposable in today's Internet age than we would like to believe.
[ link to this | view in thread ]