Palm Regains Control Of Palm OS, In All Its Outdated Glory
from the just-a-little-late dept
News today is that Palm has secured a perpetual license to Palm OS Garnet (via Engadget) from Access, the Japanese company which bought PalmSource in the fall of 2005. The history of the Palm OS has plenty of twists and turns since the original Palm split off PalmSource, a company to focus on the OS, in 2003. But one thing has remained constant -- Palm OS 5, or Garnet. It's by now about five years old, and despite the tinkering that's been done with it along the way, it's been surpassed by other smartphone OS like Symbian and Windows Mobile. Outside of Palm itself, the Palm OS hasn't been attractive for quite some time, and nearly three years ago, PalmSource talked of the need to make it better suited to smartphones. The supposed successor to Garnet, designed for smartphones, never went anywhere, and has fallen by the wayside, leaving Symbian and Windows Mobile to dominate the market. So, congratulations, Palm, you've now basically got full control of an outdated operating system that even you yourself have turned away from. Wall Street's been trying to figure out where the company is headed, and moves like this don't seem to elicit much confidence.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
PalmOS
Is it because of the lack of 3D graphics of something? I don't understand... The PalmOS never needed a lot of Ram, CPU or anything really and it just ran like the wind. I've never liked Windows CE or mobile, whatever they call it now, cause it honestly wasn't as flexible at the time as PalmOS.
Guess I'm just behind the times or something. It has been years since I shopped PDAs lol...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Palm?
I just laught when people say palm is dead. it's just there system is solid and has a good communite with it. plus i dont have to work to hard to get the device to work. it dose it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I've got a Palm TX - I can play my mp3s, watch movies, surf the internet, connect to my phone, edit word/excel/powerpoint docs with absolutely no problems and with no cost as everything that costs came bundled.
Previous I've owned a Palm 105, 130, Zire 71.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You may be right in questioning the hire-and-fire attitude of Palm (outsourcing, just to please Wall Street), but anyone who's ever worked with PalmOS seems to love it - and my colleague's iPAQ with its you-know-i'll-screw-up-again-in-a-second Windows Mobile (with about 30 mins of battery life) always gets me laughing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Back on planet Earth
What are you looking for this old, broken-down thing to do to not be "outdated"? Play quake?
I've looked at WinCE devices, WinMobile, and Symbian. I keep coming back to Palm. Why? Because when it comes down to it, PalmOS does exactly what I want it to without the muss, fuss, or nearly punative battery life of the others.
Say all bad you want to about PalmOS, and those of us who use it will blithely smile at you and go on our merry way, still using it. That kind of user comfort and loyalty says a whole lot more, don't you think?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
KISS works
I have had multiple devices based on palm os, and every one of them has done it's job well. the wireless Palm VII was a bit off, but that is a different story.
I now have a Treo 700w and I hate the thing. It is what my company gave me to use, so I didn't have a lot of say, but the thing is so infuriating with just simple things that I can't wait to get rid of it.
Some gripes:
1) the OS locks up and makes it so I can't answer the phone or switch tasks
2) applications don't close when I close them, they sit in the background sucking up valuable memory. If you are going to have the X in the corner to close an app, CLOSE THE DAMN THING!
3) having a folder structure on a portable device is SLOW when trying to find files, and virtually requires you use the stylus
4) having to go to a menu button to find the mute and speaker phone options is stupid! I love that on the Palm based Treo's, there is a button right on the screen you can press
5) some of the programs that run on the windows mobile os are SLOW to load and run. Too much overhead I think. Most Palm OS apps that I have used run fairly quickly when opened.
In my opinion FWIW, I love the simplicity of the Palm interface, and the efficient functionality. OS 5 is a bit behind, but it is still head and shoulders above windows mobile 5!
Anyone want a used 700w? I'll trade it, and a mule for a 700p
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I have to agree.....
I do have some complaints about the 700p, most notably the fact that some older apps do not work with it. (Some even cause it to reboot continuously.) However, the majority of the important apps I use work perfectly, so why would I want to change?
Also, I seem to have a hardware problem that causes occasional reboots, but that might be my fault instead of the device's.
Overall, I think Dosquatch has it right when he calls the Palm OS "mature". It sure seems to be stable, as compared to anything Microsoft releases.........
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is it that broke?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Palm OS
Now considering buying a Treo running Palm OS.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: KISS works
Hardware mute button in easy reach.
Good form factor, solid feel.
Gripes:
No wifi (thanks to stupid phone companies)
No SD > 2 GB (if you want tons of MP3s)
No stereo bluetooth
Crappy resolution camera
So basically, I finally have a phone / PDA / camera that does almost everything I need it to do in a nice stable easy to use package.
My wife has a Q. What a mess. It is pretty, but difficult to use. Too bad a lot of people buy pretty.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Windows Mobile???
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Palm OS dead? I don't think so.
Oh did I mention that I can read Adobe Acrobat documents, watch movies and create small spreadsheets?
Gosh, what are we going to do with such a "limited" OS? It doesn't even crash!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sounds like Linux
What a load of crap. Has anyone ever tried to sync their contacts list in Outlook with a Palm based system? I had a TungstenT3 and I hated it. It wasn't very customizable, the terminology wasn't industry standard when it did offer the customizability.
When I have any operating system I expect it to work. I don't want to have to tweak it here, do this there, and dance with maraccas around a mexican hat. I want the product to work. Period.
I currently have the Cingular 8125 or HTC Wizard as it's called, and it comes with Windows Mobile 5, and it just works. No desktop manager to install. Just plug it in and it syncs fine with Outlook and transfers all your data. Oh... and by the way... it also came with Word, Powerpoint, and Excel. Oh yeah... it also has a PDF reader and if I would bother with the Data package it'll behave just like a Blackberry and give me all my email while on the road... Let PalmOS do that for you.
Non-customizable, "I-have-to-be-a-moron-to-run-it" OS. And if you want it to be able to do other things you have to download plugins galore... Oh it's a great MobileOS. PalmOS sucks and is just as unstable as all the other Mobile OSes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sounds like Linux
What a load of crap. Has anyone ever tried to sync their contacts list in Outlook with a Palm based system? I had a TungstenT3 and I hated it. It wasn't very customizable, the terminology wasn't industry standard when it did offer the customizability.
When I have any operating system I expect it to work. I don't want to have to tweak it here, do this there, and dance with maraccas around a mexican hat. I want the product to work. Period.
I currently have the Cingular 8125 or HTC Wizard as it's called, and it comes with Windows Mobile 5, and it just works. No desktop manager to install. Just plug it in and it syncs fine with Outlook and transfers all your data. Oh... and by the way... it also came with Word, Powerpoint, and Excel. Oh yeah... it also has a PDF reader and if I would bother with the Data package it'll behave just like a Blackberry and give me all my email while on the road... Let PalmOS do that for you.
Non-customizable, "I-have-to-be-a-moron-to-run-it" OS. And if you want it to be able to do other things you have to download plugins galore... Oh it's a great MobileOS. PalmOS sucks and is just as unstable as all the other Mobile OSes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ARGH. Frustrating.
I actually used to love Palm, but they've just fallen behind to the point that unless your needs are dead simple, it's just not robust enough. I do have to say though, I think UMPC's will kill both Palm and Win Mobile, and I can't wait until the day I can run either Linux or XP on a handheld and have stuff just work.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sounds like Linux
anyway why can't windows Moble sync wirelessly?? my pda can,
can yours??
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I had perfect freedom to select with Palm OS or Windows Mobile for my most recent smartphone. I tested out both systems for a while. I researched the software I could get for them. In the end, I chose Palm OS. They just do more things "right."
What a hatchet-job, Carlo.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Sounds like Linux
Has anyone ever tried to sync their contacts list in Outlook with a Palm based system?
Every day, without a problem.
it also came with Word, Powerpoint, and Excel.
So did my Treo.
it also has a PDF reader
As do I.
and if I would bother with the Data package it'll behave just like a Blackberry and give me all my email while on the road... Let PalmOS do that for you.
PalmOS does that for me. Every day. POP3 connection to GMail. I didn't even bother with the data plan, I just burn airtime minutes.
I want the product to work. Period.
And you picked WM? To each their own.
Yeah, yeah, I know, don't feed the trolls. But they're just so darned *cute*.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And don't mention how great your Treo is (and I won't mention market share stats for smartphone OS). Come back when the OS allows multitasking, and developers don't have to hack it in to their apps.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
And don't mention how great your Treo is
Wouldn't if t'weren't true.
Come back when the OS allows multitasking,
How many things at once do you want to do? I can use any app while I'm on a call. I can invoke my dictionary and thesaurus from inside of other applications. I can cut & paste from one app to another (despite the lament of another previously). Any program I'm in remembers where it is if I leave and come back.
Just what is your gripe?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Love PalmOS
I've had a IIIxe, Visor Deluxe, Clie sj22, m130 and m515. They all do the main thing I want a PDA for:
Carry my contacts/schedule/notes with me and sync with my computer(s) when I get back to a real computer. It works fast enought that I can take notes on it. Sometimes I even look things up on it instead of in the real computer.
I sync on Linux, MacOSX, and Windows to Exchange. I can also run an emulator to get to my data if the palm is broken.
Beyond that, other functions are gravy. I would like wifi w/ web browsing and MP3 playing. I don't use the email on it.
I have a blackberry for work. The email works very well. Opera is ok for web surfing on the tiny screen. The phone sucks (it's too big!). It's too hard to take notes on. Some JavaMe games play well, but they'd work on the Palm too I suppose.
Eventually these things are going to converge: phone, mp3, calendar, contacts, mobile web, mobile im, and low level camera. I hope they get the interface for it as well as palm did with the original pilot.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A little heavy-handed, methinks
My own PDA history stretches back to 1991. After thirteen years and four different Psion machines I bit the bullet and went with a Tungsten T, last year I upgraded to a T2. I have no regrets. What do I use it for? Let's see... PIM, Address book, voice recorder, Documents, spreadsheets, Timesheets, News/Weather/Directions from AvantGo, Bibles, MP3 and Video, and a few games.
It is true that the Standalone PDA is a dying breed... this is partly because more people prefer technology that helps them yap to technology that helps them be more productive. This is reflected in their purchasing priorities - for most people. $400 is too much to spend on a PDA ever few years, yet $30+ per month for phone service is perfectly ok. As for me, I use my phone about a minute a day (pay as you go) and I use my PDA more or less constantly. I would prefer two separate units to an all-in-one.
Palm started off with a simple tool that worked well - it is still possible to look up an address one-handed. Data is secure, migrates easily when upgrading hardware, lockups rarely lose data.
MS, on the other hand, attempted to create a machine that does everything. It took several years for the hardware to catch up with the ambitions of the software.
Ironically, the Clie-toting friend who first turned me onto Palms ended up with a Pocket PC a few months ago he played with a LifeDrive and was so impressed they had trouble prising it out of his hands.
It really depends on what you want to do... if you live a Microsoft-Centric life then by all means go with a MS solution. If you value the efficiency that Palm provides, then that's the way to go.
As for me, I am about to trade up to a T3...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The one thing I DO NOT do is use my PDA to make phone calls. If I want a phone; I'll buy a phone.
If I want to surf the internet on the size screen the average PDA comes with I'll....I'll have myself committed.
Those mobiles, with their built in phones do not interest me.
They steal battery power and there's not much point in paying through the nose for the ability to surf the net on a screen that small when I've got my laptop to fill that need.
As long as there are people like myself who simply wish for a small COMPUTER to carry around in their pockets, there will be a PDA market.
PS: I have both a PPC and a Palm. I started with an iPaq and then moved to a couple of refurbished Palms (under $30) before finally shelling out for a Palm Zire 72. I also have the Dell Axim I picked up not so long ago...I hardly ever use it though in favor of my Palm....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No longer a Palm user....
I no longer have a Palm.
Why?
Because the Treo crashed a lot, dropped connections, Bluetooth and push email never worked right and I was spending hours fiddling with it to get stuff to work.
Yeah, 5 years ago the Palm OS WAS the best PDA OS out there, bar none. I now have a Blackberry and it's miles better than the Treo ever was, no comparison. The BB delivers what it promises, the Treo consistently failed to deliver.
Palm needs to make devices that are able to work as advertised, from Bluetooth to multi-tasking to push email. Their current devices barely work and that's why I switched to a BB. I don't have time to debug devices for Palm.
All I can say is that, if you are a Palm user and you are frustrated that stuff only kinda works, get a BlackBerry, it just works.
Chris.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A little heavy-handed, methinks
[ link to this | view in thread ]