The Copyright Battle Over Bambi
from the a-true-Disney-story dept
If you've ever heard Larry Lessig's stump speech on creativity and copyright, you know that it has a chunk in the middle dedicated to the fact that Disney, one of the biggest proponents of copyright extension to keep Mickey Mouse protected, has a long history of taking the ideas of others and reusing them in their own stories. In fact, the biggest irony is the fact that Disney "stole" (using their language) the very idea behind Mickey Mouse's Steamboat Willie debut from Buster Keaton's Steamboat Bill -- which came out the same year. Plenty of other popular Disney movies all came from using content in the public domain -- but not all of it. William Patry goes through the court battle from about a decade ago where questions were raised about Disney's rights to the story of Bambi. Turns out they might not really have owned the rights to it. Patry focuses on the case and why the ruling is exceptionally bad, but even more interesting to me is the lengths Disney went to try to win the case. As Patry notes, they basically threw out every possible argument to see what stuck, including claiming that Bambi was really in the public domain and then that it wasn't in the public domain, but that Disney owned the rights to it, rather than the heirs of the author of the story. So whenever Disney claims some moral right to keep extending copyright, it seems like the Bambi fight is worth pointing out as a counter example alongside the Steamboat Willie story.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Factoid or article?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lawyer double-speak
It is basically throwing theories at the judge/jury (whatever the case may be) and see which one holds traction.
Every (good) lawyer does this and, in reality, is probably the least worst way to conduct law.
They do have a fancy name for this methodology -- it's called pleading in the alternative, and like I said it's about as common in the courtroom as bullshit is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lawyer double-speak
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
agree with #1
The only thing recent about this 'article" is the blog that it was stolen from, but even the author of the blog admits he is writing about an old topic (most recent related occurrence being 1996)
Slow news day or what?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bambi is balllin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
shanghai
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
newest jordan shoes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]