Product Improvements Outpacing Even Planned Obsolescence?
from the perhaps dept
We've written a few times in the past about how your memory isn't fooling if you if you think today's gadgets and gizmos are built with lower quality than consumer electronics from years gone by. Part of the reason is simply planned obsolescence, where companies are innovating so much they expect you to simply upgrade when the last one you bought breaks. However, a new article suggests that even planned obsolescence is a thing of the past as the pace of innovation is such that people feel compelled to upgrade relatively quickly, not waiting for their gadgets to break. The main focus of the article, though, is how this presents quite the conundrum for consumer electronics buyers, who always know that what they buy today will be a lot cheaper tomorrow. Of course, it's not really clear how that's any different than how things used to be. People have always struggled with the timing on when to buy computers or consumer electronics, knowing that there was always a next generation coming, and today's products would just get cheaper. However, if you wait until the next generation is released, you should realize that you're only going to be tempted to buy the newer, fancier one anyway.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Always a step behind!
Do you REALLY need all the bells and whistles on your digital camera, cell phone, laptop, etc? How many times do you use those kidns of products to the full extent of their capability?
Chances are 99% of the time the previously released product will be just fine.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I have special needs...
I just bought a brand new top of the line AMD dual-core, which is of course already out-dated 6 months later, but it WAS top of the line at the time. The only reason I did that was because I needed all the horsepower I could get for a mixing system.
But, sitting right next to it is my browsing and gaming system...it's a good 5 years old. Even when I buy brand new stuff, I squeeze all the time I can get out of it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
how about this...
Me, personally, I never buy a product for it's features, I buy the product with the features I need. If people did this, then part of the problem is solved. When buying a product I sit down and list what features I need, then by the product with all or the features I need (at the cheapest price).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: how about this...
I wonder why companies don't move towards a subscription model some hardware (especially hardware that gets updated often like cell phones). For X dollars per year you have access to a "family" of products. As the next model in a family comes out, you have the option of getting it or not.
As long as companies know they can make lots of money on people that will replace their hardware when the next model releases in six months (even if it doesn't break) they'll never go with your idea there.
I usually just figure out what I need and then buy a few steps behind what is the current top of the line. For example I plan on building a PC in the next month or so. I'm not going for the all out turbo charged latest model processor. In fact I'm fine with my little 600mhz Pentium 3 (and 8mb intergrated video card)...except for gaming which is what I want to get into. My plan is to buy a motherboard that will allow for mulitiple processor upgrades in the future.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
old vs new
I think what Tyshaun says is interesting though. Hardware rental may return because of green economics. We simply cannot have 100 million used cellphones ending up in landfill sites or being incinerated each year. The company best equipt to manage and dispose of old technology is possibly the manufacturer. The manufacturer knows the chemical and physical composition of the device best to recycle it and with new taxes being proposed which encompass the total environmental cost of ownership it may turn out best for all parties to send your cellphone back to the manufacturer
for recycling.
Older technology is best from a security viewpoint too. Hardware manufacturers have proven themselves unworthy of trust. If you want to make sure your latest purchase of computers are not leaking information through backdoors or spying on your employees then 2 year old technology that has been exposed to public scrutiny is a sensible path. Either that or use open source software on an open spec hardware platform.
Finally, Xenohacker is spot on about features and necessity. Many new devices are really the experimental edge of the market and contain features which are innovative but unproven. This practical market research with cutting edge products is necessary but many features turn out to be not what what people really want. Your purchases should be driven by your own needs and not pushed on you. Most people use less than half the features on technology they own.
[ link to this | view in thread ]