Who Needs Linux When You Can Get Windows 2000 On The Cheap?
from the not-the-original-plan dept
Back in August, a German court ruled that there is no right of first sale when it comes to software licenses. In other words, a company that bought software from a certain vendor can't turn around and sell it after they no longer need it. This is obviously in the interest of software companies, though it's seemingly at odds with the idea that software should be thought of as tangible property. So, either that ruling isn't being enforced, or the government is free to ignore it as the city of Munich has recently purchased some used licenses of Windows 2000, presumably to the chagrin of Microsoft, which would like organizations to be buying hot out of the oven Vista licenses. Microsoft has ceased supporting Windows 2000 in an effort to prompt upgrades, but this creates an opportunity for third party support for companies that see little reason to make the switch. Going against the law is just one odd thing about the purchase. Recall that Munich has garnered a lot of attention over its decision to ditch Windows and go completely with Linux. That process has been plagued by delays, and claims that the project is failing. It seems that the city is still moving ahead, but it's clear that ditching Windows cold turkey isn't an easy task.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
There Is No Monopoly......
The fact that the Linux rollout is stalling points out the problem with open source solutions. The majority of the free world is using the non-monopolistic Micro$oft OSes and will continue to do so until PC manufacturers start installing some flavor of Linux. Of course, since few people use it, why would they shoot themselves in the foot?
Microsoft is not a monopoly....Microsoft is not a monopoly....Microsoft is not a monopoly....Microsoft is not a monopoly....Microsoft is not a monopoly....Microsoft is not a monopoly....Microsoft is not a monopoly....Microsoft is not a monopoly....Microsoft is not a monopoly....Microsoft is not a monopoly....Microsoft is not a monopoly....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Linux Users
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Linux Users
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I've got a copy to sell.....
Fedora 5 is as Boris would say "Strong like Bull.") and installs like a champ, I've heard of other good Linux versions that have matured in mainstream reliability. I'm not a Gates hater, but his OSs are not secure enough and support is awful, like an update service that points to nothing and installs stuff you don't want (validation).
If the government in Munich is having a problem, it's because it's a bunch of bureaucrats not the software.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Linux Users
I read a bit about this project, and they are stalled with delays because they failed to get the adequate training, support, and people for completing the task. They had the money budgeted for it, but decided to be cheap about it and not spend the it. Sending a bunch of Windows admins to do a migration to Linux will always end in disaster.
Really, Linux isnt rocket science at all.. its pretty easy stuff, its just foreign if you've come from a Windows world. The great thing is, once you've learned Linux, you will feel at home in just about every other operating system in the world, aside from Windows. Windows really is a bizarre, twisted creature that departs from the design principles and foundation that the rest of the computer world has been using, refining and building upon for 20-30 years.
And yes it is a viable alternative, and the probably the preferred alternative to those who know their trade.
And please... try asking for help in #windows on efnet or any of the other Windows Guru "hangouts" hang outs and see how polite they are. Normal people become quite the jackasses when hidden behind the anonymity of the internet. Linux geeks, windows geeks, mac geeks are not exceptions.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Linux Users
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ahh... the lovely smell of arrogance in the morning.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
first sale
The way some try to get around this to make the contractual terms of non-transferrence. But this is a grey area. The contract ceases at the point of resale. I remember a ruling where someone won against London Transport who claim you may not transfer your weekly travel card for the underground (metro system). I think it was later overturned on appeal, but as you point out, the fact remains non-transferrence is incompatible with centuries of established property law. It's hard to see any moral justification for it either as the vendor is not losing anything, the purchaser has already paid up front for the goods/services. A lost potential sale is tough titty, but it is not the same as actual lost revenue. Secondhand bookstores exist despite the arrogant assertions of some publishers that their titles are not transferrable. It's just unenforcable and generally laughed out of court.
As for Linux vs Windows; Linux is a superior operating system. If anybody disagrees I will fight them ;) Any takers?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My momma
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Yes, you are right. You are being arrogant. You obviously have never tried to move away from solitare. I'll admit windows has it's pluses, but linux has more pros than cons, unlike windows.
is it arrogance or ignorance on your part? Or, the more likely, both?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Linux Users
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: My momma
I set my own mothers computer up on WinXP Pro before I moved out a couple years ago. I set up the router's firewall, and she used Kaspersky at first but not long after I discovered the greatness of NOD32 and installed that for her via Remote Desktop.
Every time I come home, I run a spyware and virus check. Absolutely clean as a whistle. Office has given her zero problems (a couple crashes, but it recovered her work, usually just fancy letters), and even though IE7 is relatively safe I keep her on Firefox just to err on the side of caution.
Meanwhile, perhaps six months ago I tried relentlessly to get Ubuntu to work on my new Compaq laptop. Lo and behold, zero compatibility with its wireless and card reader, and its control over power options was flakey (I'm not even sure it actually was scaling the processor speed on demand or not) at best. When I went to reinstall Windows XP MCE 2005, all of it worked upon booting.. but of course worked better after new drivers were loaded.
Linux is great for older hardware, those that like to feel like they're special somehow, or great for servers. But for power users that just want to get stuff done on their home computer in the real world without a thought of compatibility, then Windows is hard to dispute.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
There is no viable OS for the desktop
And I'll tell you why:
- Windows is unweildy, clunky, bizarre at times.
- GNU/Linux is unweildy, clunky, is bizarre at times.
- MacOS is unweildy, clunky and is bizarre at times too.
It just depends from which viewpoint you come from, and what exactly you need from your computer.
Try switching from Windows to Mac, and you'll encounter a lot of WTF-moments.
Same goes for switching from Windows to GNU/Linux, GNU/Linux to Mac, GNU/Linux to Windows, Mac to GNU/Linux, Mac to Windows.
It all depends on your experiences with computers and OS' and what exactly you need.
I've switched from Windows to GNU/Linux, and I like it. But that's just because all I use my computer for is surfing the web, downloading email, do some word-processing, listening to music, and playing some games.
And I figured, why pay about a half-month pay for an OS (and other software), when I can get an OS, that does everything I need/want, for free?
I could have gone to Mac too, but that would have been more expensive for me.
So switching for me was a no-brainer.
The question is not whether it's viable for the desktop, but if $OS_of_choice is viable for _you_! What you want from your computer is something different than what your neighbour wants.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Linux Users
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: My momma
So yeah. Compatibility at that time was zero. Could blame it on the hardware maker for not supporting Linux, or could blame Linux for not being marketable enough for system makers to see any profit potential in it. If it was worth anything on desktops, it'd be put on desktops, and then more hardware makers would have a profitable reason to make better drivers. But the free market says its inferior, so its not on many new desktops, and so driver support bites, and no one to blame but itself.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
is it arrogance or ignorance on your part? Or, the more likely, both?
part of the problem is i have moved away from solitaire. gaming aside, apart from most people being unable to maintain a smooth running windows install there aren't that many cons to windows. the only problem card any linux fanboy plays is security. sure, windows security sucks ass yet I've never had a problem with viruses or a compromised system. however, you can't judge windows based upon the ineptitude of the majority of its users. the majority of people are morons and wouldn't even know how to run a command prompt based linux. now that linux is moving towards pretty guis that don't actually promote any functionality, i'll guarantee the same people who have problems running windows would have problems running linux.
so now, please, inform me of all the negative aspects of windows outside of security. and the ineptitude of the majority of the user base is not one in itself... i'm certainly no windows fanboy, i do enjoy linux and i personally think an operating system shouldn't itself be run by the user through a gui. however linux has too many hurdles that are too high for it to clear to become a viable alternative to windows.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
i never said it doesn't work outside its niche. i just alluded to the fact that windows is all around better outside of the server area. linux is slowly catching up but windows has too much market share for it to actually catch up. see, i'm not saying windows is a better constructed os than linux. you'd have to be a fool to think such a thing. we're talking about viability here... warp yourself back to the early 90s, which os was most viable for use in the design field? ... does this mean the mac os used was inherently constructed better than linux or does it mean that the software that the mac os supported was geared more towards design?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Time for a Linux Alternative
To all those who think otherwise, I dare you to download the latest verion of Ubuntu (6.10 codenamed Edgy Eft) and give it a try. It is a fantastic OS that can do almost anything you can imagine.
I also run a free computer consulting business with the open source model and I have personally installed Linux on over a hundred computers now.
Simply put, Ubuntu is a better product that Windows XP due to the large amount of drivers and open source software available. (No more installing SATA drivers from a floppy, yeah!)
A base install of Ubuntu comes with everything an average user needs for free. It is a better and more complete solution than XP which requires you to download numerous pay applications to do even simple things like unzipping a .rar file or reading a PDF.
Microsoft cannot compete anymore and in 3 months when most Linux distros will have composite by default Vista will have a hard time fashioning itself as the "best" OS around.
Open Source isn't an idea, it is a revolution. Do you want to be in the known (Windows) or do you want to explore the unknown (Linux) and find out the wonders that open source can accomplish?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I've got a copy to sell.....
Accounting software? Anyone who can operate a spreadsheet can get an equivalent or better money management tool. But most people don't actually *know* spreadsheets.
Is the GiMP the "equivalent" of Photoshop? Again, you'd get laughed out of the room.
What about the app to use the iPod, iTunes or some other piece of hardware actually relevant to consumer user? Or most wireless or Bluetooth products?
Saying "I'm not a Gates hater" doesn't absolve you from making unsubstantiated and outright false claims in support of an immature DESKTOP operating system that rarely fills user needs and requires more maintenance and hands on deep OS understanding that is a turnoff to the person who wants to check email, weather, their MySpace page, and download stuff to their iTunes - i.e. 95% of home computer users.
Grow up and accept the reality of doing business in today's world.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Time for a Linux Alternative
since when do you need "pay applications" to unrar .rars or read .pdfs? last i checked that software was free. why microsoft doesn't include their own utilities? i cannot say for sure but microsoft gets into enough anti-trust trouble with the software it does include, so yea, i'm sure they want to include support for .rars causing more software company's software to become obsolete. and why would microsoft include an adobe reader with its own software? last i checked it was microsoft, not microsoft and adobe...
Simply put, Ubuntu is a better product that Windows XP due to the large amount of drivers and open source software available. (No more installing SATA drivers from a floppy, yeah!)
so windows doesn't have a large amount of drivers and open source software available?
Open Source isn't an idea, it is a revolution. Do you want to be in the known (Windows) or do you want to explore the unknown (Linux) and find out the wonders that open source can accomplish?
so many things wrong with that statement i won't even bother... i take it you don't develop software...?
again, i think linux is great, it just has a lot further to go before it can compete in the market with windows...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Linux Users
that might have been true in the 90's when your typical linux user was a refugee from comercial unix and linux was used primarily for cheap servers, but in the last 5 years the linux community has bent over backwards to accomodate newbs.
of course that doesn't stop disgruntled newbs from making "OMFG linux sucks" posts to support forums.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Apples to Apples
There's no comparison between Linux and Windows. Linux isn't "user friendly" because it's a little too advanced for most people. However, functionally it is light years ahead of Windows.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Apples to Apples
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Those crazy Germans...
They decided to go with OSS out of a reactionary stance towards Microsoft without properly preparing for the realities of Open Source.
Good or bad - it requires preparation (just as *nix to Windows does) that MUST HAPPEN or else the project will fail or lag horrendously behind schedule.
Kudos to them for trying, boo on them for being a bunch of whiners who failed to prepare for the consequences of their actions. Kudos to them for creatively selecting a platform they are comfortable with AND for exposing the hypocritical nature of intellectual property/retail software licensing.
Boo on them for blaming OSS OR MS for their obvious lack of preparation for either or for technology in general.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I've got a copy to sell.....
Name the equivalent Office package please.
OpenOffice is fine for the things most people do in an Office package. If it's not totally compatible with the MS formats, that's MS's fault for making interoperabiltity difficult, not Sun's for not achieveing 100%.
Accounting software?
There's a few packages such as KMyMoney available, perfectly fine for
Is the GiMP the "equivalent" of Photoshop?
Yes, it is. If Adobe haven't yet bothered to port Photoshop to Linux, that's an issue between Adobe and its users. For many uses, GIMP is just fine, thanks, and packages aimed at lower-end users such as f-spot are also fine for their intended uses.
What about the app to use the iPod, iTunes or some other piece of hardware actually relevant to consumer user? Or most wireless or Bluetooth products?
Bluetooth and wireless work 100% out of the box on my Mandriva system. I use Amarok for music, it totally supports the iPod and is *significantly* better than iTunes for general playback. It doesn't support purchased iTunes titles, but again that's an Apple proprietary problem, not Linux's problem.
Overall, I use Linux for everything apart from gaming, and I'm very happy with everything I use. Evolution, Amarok, f-spot, OpenOffice, Firefox and gaim do absolutely everything I need to do on a desktop system 100% of the time apart from gaming. if you want a *particular* program on Linux, talk to the makers of that program. Otherwise, stop bitching - either you use what's there or you pay your fee to Microsoft/Adobe/whoever and use the program they provide.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
From an ubuntu user...
Go a few steps farther, getting media support was a bit of a painful experience as well, "Easy Ubuntu" was probably the easiest, but after already trying a few other how-to's I was already several hours into the process. (After 5 hours of attempting to get wireless support working)
I had an interest in video editing, so I installed the handful of programs synaptic even had listed, all were buggy and grosely incomplete. As for my iPod, I actually like gtk-ipod, I can say from experience that most would prefer something closer to itunes... the default Rythmbox music player doesn't work well with the ipod, and had trouble with it all around. I liked banshee a lot, that had a similar interface, but the latest version f's up vmware (which I need to run windows for some things I need for work, that and paint shop pro is way ahead of gimp).
I still don't have a working Java implimentation that runs as a browser plugin without crashing the browser... (I have an older telnet applet, and irc applet that tend to crash things, and these are made with sun's jdk)...
All around, for email, and web browsing, it's great... it offers most of what office does (OOo), and works halfway decent. I spend most of my desktop time in it (outside of work). It doesn't come close to windows in terms of usability though. Not to mention, there is no way the current linux mindset will support COTS (commercial off the shelf) software nearly as well as windows. Windows will still run most software made for windows versions more than ten years old. Try getting any linux gui software from 10 years ago to run under a current version without a recompile... no other OS can say that. Not mac, bsd or linux. All of them break compatibility at every major release *FAR* more than windows ever does.
For the record, the reason I am running linux on my desktop, is I don't like a lot of MS's political moves.. the activation crap pisses me off (treating legit customers like criminals), and I refuse to purchase any more copies of windows. I have to run it for work, and some other projects. My windows VM is pretty much for visual studio, and paint shop pro for work.. that's it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: There is no viable OS for the desktop
(wow, I guess that gave my age away didn't it~!)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Microsoft has ceased supporting Windows 2000 in an effort to prompt upgrades..."
Huh? 2000 is supported until July of 2010.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
1) windows is not well documented. the tough answers in windows don't come free. try configuring 2003 server for the first time without an exam cram book. there are not many places that you can post a config file (or in the case of windows, a screenshot) and ask a volunteer to tell you what you are missing in a timely manner. want a tutorial or a guide? forget about it. plus, most of your serious fixes come in the form of registry edits which is way more cryptic than a bash prompt and a text editor.
2) (you're going to love this) windows hardware support is lousy. load any modern distro of linux on a desktop machine and it's mostly ready to go. put windows on the same box and you need driver disks for the MoBo, video card, NIC, sound card and sometimes even the monitor. lose those discs and you are relegated to hours of web searching. 75% of windows instability is crappily written drivers written for cheap components. yes there are far fewer drivers available for linux and they don't come out nearly as fast as they do for windows, but what's available is nearly bulletproof.
3) pre-installed applications: to make a new windows install usable i need to install: an office suite, firefox, a bit torrent client, jabber/AIM, DVD playback software, CD burning software, winrar/7-zip, a useful text editor, an SSH client, anti virus software, anti spyware software, a java VM, a codec pack, and a bazillion updates. don't get me started on the tweaks i have to do by hand after i've downloaded and installed everything.
with ubuntu i install from one ISO, run automatix and check a few boxes, get rid of the stock kernel if i'm feeling freaky and i'm ready to rock. ubuntu has a new release every six months, so my ISO is never more than a half year out of date. xp pro is how old?
BTW, want to hear what's wrong with linux stability and security? ask an openBSD user.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Time for a Linux Alternative
As a person working with computers since the DOS days linux is not easy for a windows user to pick up. as my Linux friend told me "To use Linux your expected to know how to do it from the command prompt" that is not a line I want to hear.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: first sale
[ link to this | view in thread ]
addendum
I also tried a couple commercial video editing packages for linux, one was pretty feature complete, but crashed several times, and the UI was very clunky.
I also wish there were development tools closer to what Visual Studio offers... PHP does not compare to ASP.Net ... MonoDevelop is decent for desktop apps, there's also KDevelop and a few others, but nothing is as complete a package... and yeah, I'd be willing to pay for it...
The crux of the situation is commercial software has more incentive to be usable and complete than F/OSS ... sure open-source software is great in a lot of respects, but a remarkable small segment of it is a complete software... Firefox, OOo, thunderbird, evolution and maybe 3-5 others are very nice to use.. most of it is clunky crap.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Linux Users
Those who "know their trade" are aware that different jobs require different tools that not even things like CrossoverOffice and Wine can fix.
I would like to know the last time you've ever heard of a Civil Engineer trying to run AutoDesk Land Development Desktop 2006 on a Mac or Linux box...
Heh, or a toolmaker trying to run a proprietary cutting tool design program on anything but windows (or more than likely, DOS).
I do video editing on my mac. Toy with my laptop. And stare angrily at my PC.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: I've got a copy to sell.....
MS IS the standard and OO's lack of compatibility IS Sun's issue if they choose to be relevant.
KMyMoney is a joke - but I'll give it to you - for the users who purchase accounting software it would be fine since 70% of non-business financial software goes unused after the first 60 days anyway. For users who actually track their finances - crap. Link up to investment houses and pull down your portfolio and track stock measures online. And don't say "not many users do that." I know few who don't above the age of 30.
GiMP - sorry, blaming Adobe for the virtually unusable and clunky GiMP is a cop-out. If you want to talk actual good program design you wouldnt have to compare all of your apps to actually well-used production Apps. "they won't let me use it... wahhh." You lose right there - "Your OS isn't financially viable enough to bother supporting". I used to teach GiMP classes until guess what - everyone realized photoshop wasn't only better - by comparison it was actually usable.
Bluetooh/wireless is finally working? Good - it only took the Linux community 3 years to catch up to PC and 5 to catch up to Apple - GO LINUX - you cutting edge OS you.
Your media app argument also loses luster as does any of your other arguments when you say "it doesn't actually WORK WITH iTunes and iTunes files, it just lets you have access to them". Please. You AGAIN lose the USABILITY argument (the sole point I was making). And until you quantify "significantly better playback" that's a hollow strut bolstering a flimsy argument. If it doesn't support a core feature - it does not work correctly - fin.
And your foot was finished being riddled with self-inflicted bulletholes with the "100% of the time, apart from gaming" which accounts for 70% of Gamer's computing time telling me the system is actually viable for 30% of the time for people who enjoy games which is actually still a VERY high percentage of PC users. Way to beat down the argument.
And as for the collaboration features of Office most users don't use? I do. Everyone in my organization does. Oh right, we bother to do training.
Now, before I firmly plant myself on the side of MS as more usable than Linux I'll try and talk you down from your bad trip by agreeing with you. For ACTUAL computer geeks - power users some call them - i.e. those that don't need to peruse a menu to figure out what they're doing - Linux is solid - WAY solid. I created one of the only system's I've ever come across to tackle a Knowledge Management problem using Linux and associated technologies - why? MS required too much of a buy-in and was too frequently changing strategies on KM.
SO the real reason we went with Linux? The truth - we knew it wouldnt change significantly over time. Which, take that as an insult if you will, is high praise for a system with expected longterm viability and reliability.
Paul is obviously a *nix fanboy so defensive about the nature of his fanaticism that he missed my argument completely - usability is the name of the game for normal users (90%+ of the computing population) and Windows wins. Linux loses.
Sure Linux will crunch astronomically complex number sets for you without fear of crashing but tell that to the housewife who wants to check her email in the 5 min she has b/w feeding. Tell that to the exec who has enough time to learn his new computer to figure out where the email is.
Your argument is valid Paul - for a person in a bubble that has time to spend ensuring application compatibility and someone who needs bragging rights on how many OTS software packages they replaced with free builds.
But for those of us who need to produce results in an environment dominated by usability concerns? Its MS - for better or worse. And Linux has a few years before it becomes a blip on the radar in that realm.
Thanks for playing and nice try.
No bitching here sir, just the straight dope.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Linux Users
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: I've got a copy to sell.....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
2.) actually, windows supports an enormous amount of hardware. after a fresh install of windows you can use your pc. of course you WANT to install the mobo drivers, graphics drivers, ide controller drivers, etc for optimal efficiency. do you seriously think the preloaded drivers on a linux distro provide optimal functionality of your hardware? hardly.
3.) yes, there are also many reasons for this and frankly this point of yours has serious flaws insofar as being a valid negative aspect of windows. you're diverting attention away from the fact that windows directly supports superior 3rd part products. yes yes, you can use windows emulation software but do i even need to get into the problems with that?!?! frankly, this point of yours is the most irrelevant and it's sad to see you have to reach this far for a negative aspect of windows. optimal software is not free, you shouldn't expect it to be...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Linux Users
I've used Linux since Red Hat released that nifty blue and red box back in the mid-to-late 90s. I love it - when it is applicable to the job at hand - it just hasn't been lately...
But the community - aside from the rabid defenders who are more insulting than helpful - is top notch filled with people who obviously know their game.
And I also agree with the guy who posted just prior to my last post - I have all 3 and use all 3. Mac for my Video stuff and media. Linux as my firewall and number cruncher/processing whore, and my PC to do the stuff I have to do.
They are all viable, some just have broader contexts than others.
But I still think saying Linux is as usable as Windows to the average user is a joke.
And Windows can't touch Apple...
And Apple cannot TOUCH the UI from Minority Report...
I've come to the conclusion that many of the *nix defenders, hell AND the Windows defenders, are more stuck in their camp looking to insult someone who hasn't had their religious relevation (*nix users on forums are less than tolerant and coming from a place of such (un)informedness the only comparison I can think of is fundamentalist religious zealots who violently defend the Bible but haven't read it or figured out the true intent of religion in general - do you guys really want to be the Fundamentalist Christians of IT?) and to take potshots at the other that there is a denial of reality - its so cute.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Linux Users
the few that give REAL computer users a bad name because they fancy themselves as part Neo, part Matthew Broderick from WarGames, part oppressed minority who must lash out at "the man".
"Gee that IT guy is surly"
"Yeah, he uses Unix"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What about...
And what the games for Linux? Oh, yeah! There's like 3! Unless you count the ones that come with it. My Atari 2600 has better graphics and is more fun!
The Open Office software is decent if you want to type a letter to mom or put your CD collection in a spreadsheet.
I'm not a M$ fanboy, just anti-linux.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Heck... I'd even say Ubuntu 1 year ago was utter crap compared to Ubuntu 6.10.
I've tried a few LInux operating systems, and most of them have been a bit frustrating. And yes, it's a problem that there are too many options - which distro, which desktop manager, which this, which that. That's a problem that should be solved, but that doesn't mean "Linux is stupid".
Ubuntu by itself is noob friendly enough for tasks that most people want to do. I hear it has issues with wireless still, but I don't know about that in particular. For the average desktop user, though, who does their finances, word processing, web browsing, and email 99% of the time they use the computer, Ubuntu will serve just fine out of the box with, and the support people are very nice.
Don't blame Linux because your distro sucks. Do blame Linux because there are too many friggin distros.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: first sale
Excellent example. It has good reasons for the mostpart. But, in practice many prescription drugs are resold or transferred, eg in an emergency medical situation.
"Law students learn that property isn't tangible at all, but is rather a collection of rights and relations between people (or companies, govts) regarding the thing."
Students of Marxism learn a similar thing ;) (I'm goading you)
"Modern property law is closely related to contract law."
Indeed. But is it not correct that a contract is an agreement between two parties. While you can write anything into a contract it must be reasonable and meet a number of criteria to be upheld. Consider the following,
1) A passport
2) A dangerous prescription drug that could kill anyone but the intended patient.
3) An airline ticket
4) A book
There is a spectrum here that defines a dimention of "reasonability". Profit alone is not a reasonable position, which is why I mention those cases where the contract has been found void. Right now the watershed exists somewhere between airline ticket and book depending on your locale.
" a EULA that includes non-transference is completely enforceable."
A EULA is not a contract. It is an end user licence agreement. To my knowledge no EULA has been successfully defended in court where the buyer could not read (and potentially reject) it before buying the product. Neither does a EULA offer consideration, which is an essential component of a valid contract.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
uh oh the old war continues
if you wan't to try something else (and invest time in learning somthing about computer), give linux a chance
but this hick-hack linux vs. windows is just stupid
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I run Fedora on my server, Ubuntu on my main pc and Windows on my laptop. Fedora as I need good server support without paying for MS servers. Ubuntu as its a robust Desktop environment with everything I need (it does have ipod support, and if GIMP isn't god enough for you (which I can only imagine is the case for professionals), Photoshop runs ok in wine), and windows on my laptop because it has better wireless support and better power saving support (and also as there are some things that do need windows: checking webpages in IE, using random bits of wird hardware that only have windows drivers, and playing games), not to mention a faster boot to save battery time.
OpenOffice is a perfectly servicable suite, and most people (and by most I don't mean all but a few, just the majority in some sense).
Wireless support is more widespread in windows (though the linux guys are constantly catching up, especially with ndiswrapper, though this is no good to the first time user with little know how).
There is not much good CAD software on linux. A real lack. Same for midi, and other sequancing/music creation things. (this seems to be the area which is most behind, which seems strange. Dunno why it is).
Windows does seem to have a more integrated look and feel, whereas if you want to run gnome on linux you'll have apps such as Amarok looking slightly different to the rest of the stuff.
The Bash shell to me is a godsend, along with the way applications work together in linux with pipes and similar things. There are a great many tasks which I do on linux with a single line in a BASH that'd take me ages on windows, but they are things that a lot of people just wouldn't want to do.
In my experience linux is more stable, but again it depends on what you do. Linux things crash too, and it just depends on the software you use on linux and windows as to how often they crash.
I've tried Windows AERO and linux XGL/Beryl, and to be honest theyre both jokes; the only useful things they do are make window switching better (seeing the contents of windows as you alt+tab). AERO has very few features, Beryl has lots but they're hell to configure, and it only has one useful one over AERO, the Mac style zooming out o sitch windows. AERO is smoother, beryl has more effects and customisations. Both are litle more than eye candy (but I bet some peolpe said similar of GUIs when they were new).
Wine will run many windows apps, some better than others, and many more not at all. It runs some perfectly, and some are just not quite so nice looking, easy to use, or functional in wine. On the other hand theres CYGWIN, with identical problems.
Bottom line, some people will always hate linux and vice versa, for varying reasons. However the ones who like windows are not all idiots and the ones ho like linux are not just doing it do be different and for the sake of it. Some people are just going to be able o get more done, or get in done faster on linux and some on windows. If you have the time, or no money, try linux. If you find its what you need, excellent. If its not, no harm. To the linux squad, don't neglect windows JUST becaus its MS, it is the right choice for some.
BTW, Ubuntu forums is the place to go for help, the people there are friendly and won't yell at you just because you don't know how to burn your linux install CD in windows (seriously that question gets asked a lot).
To those that hate windows: It does things well. Not everything, but it supports most hardware, and there are a few types of software that its essential for.
To those who hate Linux: the same, but replace essential for better. Be aware that if it weren't for linux and firefox many features in IE and Vistas just would be there. They took a lot from what OS software has come up with (and rightly so, its designed by vast swathes of people, so why shouldn't MS take the best ideas and integrate them or attemt to improve upon them).
PS, fir the record I really hate windows, it gets my goat, and I think its too big an organisation with too big a monopoly, but thats not why I use linux. I started just to have a look, and learn more about computers (i've learned a lot that I otherwise wouldn't), and decided its pros actually outweighed its cons for my purposes. But I still use windows for a good bit of stuff.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Was a great time.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What about...
now to go COMPLETELY off topic...
I'll just put my little disclaimer here first that im a linux user, a programmer, a govt. contractor, and a heavy gamer. (min 3 hours a day :) )
First off, though im a bit pissed at them now, an out of the box install of SuSE 10.1 always worked perfectly for me, and I installed it on friends and family machines with default installs no problem. Not one hardware problem, even though a laptop i installed it on had problems installing XP. (creating the NTFS partition always failed with no error code, tried two different hard drives too...)
I've put it on friends and family's machines and enabled the "redmond" theme in the built in theme manager (all gui based in kde) and voila, they're none the wiser that it isnt windows, their office works, their internet works, their video's work, etc... and that's what users really want. the ONLY problems with the install were licensing issues, NOT technical ones. Installing the mp3 codec (a download and one click + pw installl) and Installing the WMV codec( same as mp3). Not a as big a point as most normal users would never install windows themselves anyways. The machine's have been being used heavily by NON TECHY users for a long time now with absolutely no problems. and hell, it's helped me too, not a single call ("i think i have a virus", "my internet stopped working!", "everything's running slow!"). Hell, now i have to call and check in, and actually ask them how it's goin.
also, linux not good for games? hell, someone complaining about that earlier mentioned a few games that have linux native versions! My UT2k4 came with the linux and window's installs on the cd, doom3 does require you download the client from id and install it. (easy rpm install, no harder than double clicking a .exe, just with password :) ) Others i'll admit took about 2 more clicks than in windows, though there was no performance hit. The $9 i spent on cedega was way worth it, run cedega installer, insert game cd, install game, poof, it plays. Half life 2, battlefield 2, world of warcraft, ultima online, neverwinter nights is native linux. Wireless lan? works great on my cards, no drivers needed. no virus scanners on my system, no spyware blockers or other resource hogs. Got my hardware firewall and good practices, cant do much more than that on any os.
No, linux isnt perfect, its far from it. but this "not an alternative" crap gets old.
come online and get owned sometime, my fav ut2k4 servers...www.rosebum.com and fat jimmies vctf, uo shard origin
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
And you're not a fanboy of windows?
Everyone is a fanboy of something or another, especially you since you're fighting so arrogantly for windows.
I dual boot and use Windows for games only and Linux for when I want to get work done. How many Linux vendors treat their customers like criminals as Microsoft does (i.e. black listing product keys on valid computers)
You might want to wait on further posts until after you graduate.
Highschool.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Someone
yea, photoshop 6 runs ok in wine, maybe 7 depending on your cpu performance and ram latency... that's REAL helpful... (and i'm not technically a "professional" in some regards... i do get paid for my artistic abilities in the digital realm so, sure, some could consider me professional but considering it's not my career i would say otherwise)... also, even with wine you still severely lack in performance compared to running the software on the platform it was compiled for (mac or windows photoshop versions)... you will NEVER have equal performance on equal hardware with emulation ... EVER... it is an impossibility...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: What about
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Someone
intel code is intel code, runs the same on linux or windows, wine only trapps the "windows only" calls and routes them to the linux equivilants. It's as much an emulator as directx & opengl emulates graphics card functions.
It is perfectly possible, and does actually happen quite often where Wine can execute windows code faster than windows can.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Someone
If you read the other bits of my post you realise that I said Wine isn't perfect and my general point was that no OS is, and different OSs are good for different people. Actually for a lot of people having photoshop (and other things) run in wine is very helpful indeed. People who prefer the things that get the job done for them in linux can do a 10 minute job in a windows app without restarting or resorting to VM (which has serious slowdown). I wouldn't want to use it in wine all day what with the lack of antialiasing on the menu fonts and all, but i'd rather do it for 10 minutes than than reboot twice. Oh and the guy above was right about wine not being an emulator. the only slowdown wine gets (other than for not-yet-implemented features, bugs, and of coure if it even runs the software at all, that is) come from system calls.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Someone
interesting... considering WINE stands for windows emulator. your post is fairly accurate insofar as wine not being a cpu emulator and it's a set of libraries assimilating the compiled code from the native windows apis into x86 assembly code. however It is perfectly possible, and does actually happen quite often where Wine can execute windows code faster than windows can. is rather inaccurate, while it is possible and does happen, the scale on which is happens is blown greatly out of proportion by yourself. wine OCCASIONALLY executes code faster than windows... which i'm assuming falls on either notepad or calculator. however, wine is still essentially an emulator of the windows apis. a translation must still occur (whether by the software or by the programmer), translation results in more cpu time and/or inexact replication. the wine creators blame this on windows having optimized their code. that's what it comes down to in a nutshull. optimization... however, without the use of the actual windows libraries how is wine anything but just an emulator? sure, it's not a software emulation of hardware, it's a software emulation of other software which still falls prey to the same algorithmic downfalls (of course not to the same degree). it also differs greatly from directx and opengl, if the reasons allude you then i'm sorry...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Someone
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Someone
interesting... considering WINE stands for windows emulator.
No, actually I'm afraid that WINE does in fact stand for Wine Is Not An Emulator. It doesn't 'assimilate the compiled code from the native windows apis into x86 assembly code,' not least of all because that series of words doesn't actually mean anything.
It just runs the code natively, looking out for system calls, and when it finds them, passes them instead to its own library. Oftentimes the reason why things run faster is that some system calls are not handled, as the aplications is trying to do something with or to the OS that doesn't make sense on linux. If its something that isn't really needed for the running of the program then it can be seen as a performance increace. if it is, it can be seen as a bug. The 'many things faster in wine' is a litle misleading, but I think it would be fair to say that AMONG the things that work perfectly in wine, many of them run the same or faster in wine that on windows.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
a bunch of Re:'s
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Better question
All I have seen in the previous 60 posts are
Linix may run the games I want to play
If not WINE may (And may run them faster or slower)
Linix probably douse not run the other software I use
There may be software that douse what I want but it may or may not run as well
NO ONE has said that any Linux software works better than the windows counterpart.
WINE is not an emulator (Sounds like one to me)
I want to switch from Microsoft. Since They have implemented the activation thing I probably have talked to them more than my mother. (sad but probably true) But if the alternative doesn't have any (and I haven't seen any) good selling points then its going to stay 5% of the market (I'm including mac in that number since its now built on unix)
This part is just from me as a linux newbe. When I install something on windows I can find it. There is a path I can put in to the installer. by default software goes into program files in there own directory where it can easily be found latter.
Linix (and I have seen this for myself) the installs can go into (as far as I remember) /bin or /usr/bin and there are no directories. Finding the MP3 software that I just installed from that rpm file. Just a one click install? I like knowing where my software went. Or in the case of AVG for linux that the install failed. Took me an hour to figure that one out. (install said it completed successfully but in reality it stopped half way threw.)
in conclusion, I want an alternative but have yet to find any proof that this is it. (Same with Mac, I have that conversation with a coworker every week) Oh and ambiguity is not security. (I also know a few windows and linux users who think its easier to hack linux, not my opinion just theres)
Before any one flips out, I have taken Linux classes. I like how I can just restart one aspect of linux, instead of restarting the hole PC. I also like how it douse run better on most PCs. I don't like how it comes with so much preloaded software (I know windows douse the same thing and I hate them for it too)
sorry about the rant. If you want I can tell a really cool story about a walled over unix box that ran for 4 years before any one noticed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Better question
I know the story of the walled in box. ;-)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Better question
and you do? That's my dad's story.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You guys are still misunderstanding WINE
[ link to this | view in thread ]
More WINE threadjack
[ link to this | view in thread ]
To answer some things for Trigger. Yes there are linux apps that are better than their counterparts. I could tell you what my faves are but its often a matter of preference. Go to ubuntu.org and download a livecd, try it out without installing to see what you think.
If you are desperately worried about lots of games, stick with windows or dual boot. Doom, UT, UT200x, Q4 HL2 among others are fine, but theres certainly no garuntee.
If your using ubntu (and most similar apps), you don't go to a website to download the software you want (you can, but theres a better way), you use a program called synaptic (or something else in other distros). It has about 20,000 software packages listed, you can search the names and/or descriptions. You install a package, and the package manager (part of the system, not the package itself like in windows) installs what you need. If you remove it in the same way it gets rid of ALL of it. It will indeed install things to various points, and you don't need to worry about that, you'll never need to go and look at them. Install an mp3 player and it'll appear in the menu or just type its name on the console. can't remember its name? look it up in synaptic. All in all its a much neater system.
PS, don't use avg on linux, there are better solutions (although personally I don't bother.)
You can always resize the partition (may be a little effort, go to the forums at ubuntu) and dual boot with windows, just to dabble your feet. Or theres liveCDs to do the same.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Better question
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: I've got a copy to sell.....
No bitching here sir, just the straight dope."
Your missing the real point, Linux software is already good enough for the average user and could easily be made accomatable to power users.
How easy it would be to write in the few extras Office or Photoshops have. You really think it would be that hard?
And once it was done these products would be available to everyone for free. Now that is an accomplishment!
Linux and Open Source is an ideology that far ourtweighs anything MS has ever come up with.
Get with the 21st century and drop your pathetic closed sourced licensed piece of junk!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
OK
If it douse install the software to the menu then it is a step up from Fedora.
back on topic of this article, Did they really cancel support for windows 2000? that's not going to be good for our clients who still use it. Or me who has 2000 server on multiple PCs at home.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
re ubuntu: http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Edgy#How_to_apt-get_the_easy_way_.28Synaptic.29
re windows:
Yes full support has ended. There will be no more service packs or other updates, only critical security updates.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: I've got a copy to sell.....
I said nothing of any of that because until Windows has been replaced. I still stand by my original statement that Windows is more usable and relevant to today's computing environment for 90%+ of all users.
Ideology is wonderful. Ideas are wonderful. I have plenty of both but they don't have much bearing on the current realities. Yes the IDEA of open source is MUCH more attractive than anything MS has done - i.e. make you pay for their software (we DO live in a capitalistic society. despite my objections no one has listened and changed it).
The "few extras" MS Office and Photoshop have are more than a "few" it would take close to a year w/ a shop of developers to bring open office to 100% compatibility with MS Office - and that is CERTAINLY not worth anyone's effort since the catch-22 of your plan... er.. IDEA is that in order for that to be viable someone would need to invest the time and resources to do so then turn around and give it away.
Uhm, wake up? NO ONE would do that at the cost incurred. Both in legal fees for ripping off Microsoft (i disagree with patent law, just stating the facts) and in development, maintenance, and support costs.
And as for adding Photoshop functionality to the GiMP? You'd have to get a coherent UI first and foremost then you can try and bring the GiMP up to speed with Photoshop 5.
And no, I haven't missed the point. Linux may be good enough for (I'd argue overkill for) the average user but the applications are, 99 times out of 100, poor substitutes for the Windows/Mac originals. The classic case was Linux fanboy above trying to bury my argument with his iTunes clone. "it doesn't play iTunes purchased files but..."
"But" nothing. 99% of iPod/iTunes users will ditch the product the first time they try to acquire music or play existing music. Again, I am not the one at a loss with reality. I understand your perspectives on Linux, but like communism - it works VERY WELL on paper but has yet to produce a valid implementation that can compete with the current ways of doing things.
It'd be nice if the world would hold hands, sing cumbayah (sp), and throw Redmond into the Pacific but 1) it aint gonna happen and 2) we'd then lose the manufacturer of (and more importantly the support center of) the largest software distributor in the world.
Granted we'd have to go to Bangalore to ACTUALLY get rid of the call center but you get my point.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: hazard on Jan 4th, 2007 @ 3:23pm
I don't really care 'how' or 'why' drivers or apps are more available in one OS over another.
If my hardware doesn't work on an OS. I won't use it.
If I can't run my desired kinds of apps, I won't use the OS.
And finally, if I have to struggle to do the mundane on an OS, it's not worth my time.
So, technically, operating systems could be compared without weighing drivers or apps. However, in practice, without apps or drivers, you have absolutely no need for the damn OS to begin with.
Here's a helpful hands-on experiment to prove my point.
Run an OS without drivers or apps, and let me know how useful it is.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: One more reply, I swear!
Glad to see your willing to look critically at Windows.
"The "few extras" MS Office and Photoshop have are more than a "few" it would take close to a year w/ a shop of developers to bring open office to 100% compatibility with MS Office - and that is CERTAINLY not worth anyone's effort since the catch-22 of your plan... er.. IDEA is that in order for that to be viable someone would need to invest the time and resources to do so then turn around and give it away."
But thats what is wonderful about Open Source. You don't need to hire the developers, they are everywhere willing to give their time often for free.
A whole year? I would like to see you qualify that because last time I checked (and I work in a office everyday) the features that MS office has are not that different and are often just annoying.
There is no catch 22, anyone who wants good software would use the open source method. It is already happening in 60% or more of software development labs.
Why spend money on developing something to give it away? There are millions of good reasons to do this and only one stuck-up money grubbing reason not to!
Profits are not the most important thing, community is! Thats what Linux offers us, a real community that cares about the wants and needs of its users. No closed source for-profit software scheme has ever come close to this.
"But" nothing. 99% of iPod/iTunes users will ditch the product the first time they try to acquire music or play existing music. Again, I am not the one at a loss with reality. I understand your perspectives on Linux, but like communism - it works VERY WELL on paper but has yet to produce a valid implementation that can compete with the current ways of doing things."
You go from being a little reasonable to going completely over the edge. Sometimes it is hard to admit we are wrong, but time will prove how pathetically wrong you are (my opinion).
PS: Linux doesn't just look good on paper anymore and MS's model of software domination is far closer to the way communism was practiced than Linux is to the concept of communism. :P
[ link to this | view in thread ]