Breaking News: Some Papers Actually Seem To Like Google

from the who'da-thunk-it dept

Fri, Jan 12th 2007 7:19pm — Carlo Longino

It would almost be amusing, if it weren't so sad, to see the once-proud newspaper industry flounder as it tries to figure out the internet. It's been dragged kicking and screaming into the online age, and it's made misstep after misstep thanks to a largely defensive strategy of trying to protect its core product with useless schemes like registration barriers, rather than evolving to determine and maintain its relevance in a digital world. Google has been one particular point of contention for newspapers round the world, apparently unable to comprehend that it sends them traffic, which, you'd imagine, is something they'd regard as a good thing. Given this aversion, it's a bit surprising to see a story in the WSJ this morning about how several British newspapers are actively buying Google AdWords like "North Korea nuclear test" to drive traffic to their sites, and -- in a real shocker -- changing their sites and content so as to improve their Google rankings. It's nice to see that these papers have grasped the concept that's eluded so many of their compatriots: that Google is an asset, not an enemy. They realize it's a wonderful tool to grow their audience, rather than imagining it's trying to steal it. If papers continue down their closed-shop path and ignore and actively resist sites like Google and continue to make it difficult for readers to access their content, they'll become more and more irrelevant. By embracing Google, and figuring out how to use it to their advantage, newspapers might actually find some growth in this whole internet thing.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

21 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

bendodge, 12 Jan 2007 @ 8:56pm

good. i like newspapers anyway.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
XCetron, 12 Jan 2007 @ 11:18pm

But once Google starts its own daily e-paper publication to your emails, then they'll really be screwed.

No idea why anyone would do that though, doesnt sound very efficient
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mark Warner, 13 Jan 2007 @ 1:54am

Newspapers will last forever
In one form or another, be it on paper or on some electronic paper (in the future, obviously!), newspapers will always exist, I live in London and read the free Lite newspaper and occasionally the Evening Standard. There is nothing quite like reading a paper, reading a computer screen just doesn't seem as desirable somehow.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Jan 2007 @ 3:14am

google is not your friend, nor anyone else's

You'll see.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chad Shryock, 13 Jan 2007 @ 7:26am

Re: Newspapers will last forever
I agree that newspapers will last forever. However, I think there audience will continue to decline as the newer generations get older.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Blue-J, 13 Jan 2007 @ 9:36am

I think newspapers are going to become e-newspapers like those in the movie Minority Report. Then Google can be add-in on every one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jeppy of the North, 13 Jan 2007 @ 10:35am

They need to figure out that anyone can do what I usually do. When I click on a headline and get a login request, I just google the article title and read it on another site.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Eyes wide shut?, 13 Jan 2007 @ 11:58am

And thus Google becomes a news agency?
Quote: "Given this aversion, it's a bit surprising to see a story in the WSJ this morning about how several British newspapers are actively buying Google AdWords like "North Korea nuclear test" to drive traffic to their sites, and -- in a real shocker -- changing their sites and content so as to improve their Google rankings."

News papers change their content to fit google rankings?! That sure sounds like a healthy evolution. Now we don't need to censor news anymore, the papers are doing it for us. And all that just to be popular enough to be read. This sounds like things getting worse instead of better. Strange to see that the Britisch aren't just US lapdogs in politics, but even bowing down like grass in the wind for American companies. Even stranger to see the over critical TechDirt people write such stupid things just to maintain a view they started some time ago. It's OK to change your views if you bump in to information that is relevant enough to be taken into consideration. Just don't forget to keep your brains open boyz...

Probably just my wrong view on things, let's all hail Economy. Heil Ekonomie!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
cwg1960, 13 Jan 2007 @ 1:08pm

Re: not your friend
please elaborate.....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Environment anyone?, 13 Jan 2007 @ 3:38pm

I would honestly like to see newspapers go by the wayside and more e-newspapers being used because of one thing: newspapers are made out of....paper! Getting rid of anything that uses trees and replacing it with a substitue would be one step in the right direction in regards to the environment (given that the substitue doesn't harm the environment more than before).

Recycling can only do so much.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 13 Jan 2007 @ 7:02pm

Re: And thus Google becomes a news agency?
Perfectly put!

It's absurd that by rewriting your text and websites you can adjust your SEO, I think it needs fixing or search engines are becoming useless.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Are you Surprised?, 13 Jan 2007 @ 9:22pm

Re: And thus Google becomes a news agency?
Sorry, but newspapers have always catered to what the audience wants to hear. I'm not saying all of them do, and thank God for those who don't. But this is not a new problem. Some people would argue that democracy rules, but if the majority of us are stupid, then maybe those of us who aren't should do something about it. I will always be a fan of a fair and balanced report no matter where it appears. And you're right... capitalism sucks in a lot of ways.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lol, 13 Jan 2007 @ 10:58pm

Re: Re: not your friend
Trolls don't elaborate well
[ link to this | view in thread ]
viewfromthenorth, 14 Jan 2007 @ 9:25am

Re: enviroment
the replacement for trees...as far as newsprint oriented strandboard, cellulose, etc, is available right now.
but somehow the big lumber and chemical giants got hold of the us government and had them lump Hemp in with marijuhana.. a distant relative.

fyi 5 acres of hemp produses the same amount of hi quality paper as 5 acres of trees, without the use of chemical bleatching etc.. as well it takes only one season to get a hemp crop off..the trees need 10 - 15 years of growth.

hemp will save the world..the oils are usable as foods or fuels

be smart and look past the false claims about hemp..our forefathers and their contemporaries wouldn't have even considered crossing the ocean to a new land without a barrel of hemp seeds, there with all the other essentials needed for survival.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 15 Jan 2007 @ 12:21am

If you can't beat 'em, join 'em
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Verse, 15 Jan 2007 @ 2:22am

Who Reads a Newspaper
There are many benefits of the world becoming digital. Digital data is in real time... No newspaper is going to be able to match this simple fact... The internet can tell you what's going on RIGHT NOW!

also, newspapers use tree's, digital data does not, I agree with the application of technology and those who are too afraid or set in their ways to take a step forward in saving our environment, well enough said really.

The newspaper is dying!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Eyes Wide Shut, 15 Jan 2007 @ 3:19am

Re: Re: And thus Google becomes a news agency?
Quote: "Sorry, but newspapers have always catered to what the audience wants to hear. I'm not saying all of them do, and thank God for those who don't."

Perfectly agreed, but i thought the audience were the people reading the newspaper, not the company indexing its information...

There will allways be crap reading, that i know to, but let's just make sure the quality reading maintains its standards. Which reminds me that i still have to check exactly which papers are reported doing these idiotic things. My bad!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Eyes Wide Shut, 15 Jan 2007 @ 3:34am

Re: Re: Re: And thus Google becomes a news agency?
The newspapers mentioned in the article are The Times of London, The Telegraph, and The Sun. Only one tabloid apparently. Guess we know now what kind of news sells well in the UK :-D
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Dancho Danchev, 15 Jan 2007 @ 6:43am

The old media still doesn't know how the new one w
Whereas newspapers are still content generators, ones Google cannot exist without, in the today's instant news syndication world, it's what you actually write about and its feasibility that get to harness potential traffic, not the idea of writing an article by itself. Google is absolutely not to blame, going at news.google.com you see the clustered result of what the world is writing about, all Google does is eating your site for breakfast and making it appear whereas given key words are searched for. So if you're writing for global warming in times when the whole world is watching North Korea's future developments on their nuclear program, you have a problem, you're not even going to appear in the clusted results. Even worse, you will blame Google for not showing your articles, they're there, but no one is searching for them.

The old media has a problem with its "exclusiveness" mentality, news appear much faster then they used to be, you no longer have to wait for next morning's newspaper to know what's tomorrow's news, you google, or open up your RSS reader given you know where and what to look for. Whenever newspapers realize that taking advantage of the momentum of a temporarily opened "event window" and respond as soon as they can, they'll benefit, or cease to exist.

Moreover, the old media is still believing that restricting articles behind registered portals in times when the online ad industry is reaching yet another billion $ milestone per yearly basis, is a rather shortsighted strategy. If their story is in-depth people will read it, will reference it, will delicious, blog and digg it, Google will pick it up in 5 minutes and it will be among the top 10 sites to appear, their advertisers will be astonished by the amount of traffic they manage the generate and would be interested in long-term relationships. No one is going to bother registering to read an article whose story is a commodity by itself, it wastes time, and time is opportunities. From a marketing perspective, the information a newspaper can gather about its visitors can still provide them with relevant informatin for future campaigns, compared to actually knowing someone's ZIP, news are not as online services, they're a commodity, same story told in different words where the ones with the most visionary perspective make it up as the default news items for the story in question. Momentum is everything, if North Korea conducts their second test and it's only the NYtimes who come up with a 3 pages in-depth coverage with satellite imagery from DigiGlobe in the first five hours, they'll harness the traffic due to their timely coverage, and yes, get clusted too.

Quality web design, SEO, and relevant articles go hand in hand. The rest is meeting deadlines and per-word commisioned news items or articles. Old media - wake up and embrace the new media, or you'll end up in a blogger's news item excerpt one day :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Unknowledgeable Geek, 15 Jan 2007 @ 8:34am

Re: And thus Google becomes a news agency?
Obviously you don't know what AdWords are. Until then keep your uniformed opinions to yourself. They are not changing the news, idiot.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Tarded, 15 Jan 2007 @ 12:18pm

Paper Logins
You can get free log ins without having to register for anything to all sorts of sites (including the Washington Post, New York Times and LA Times) at www.bugmenot.com. the whole point of that site is to get around websites that make you register to view content.
[ link to this | view in thread ]