Has EMI Had A Change Of Heart In China?
from the if-you-can't-beat-em dept
Chinese search engine Baidu's been involved in an ongoing legal battle against major record labels, which assert its MP3 searching functionality represents copyright infringement. It's unclear why the IFPI and its members think that linking to something represents a copyright violation, and in the latest decision, the court agreed and ruled in Baidu's favor. We've long argued that the way forward for record labels isn't through the courts, but rather by accepting the inevitability of a certain level of piracy and adapting its business models to focus on something other than just selling music. With that in mind, it's a little surprising to see the record label EMI announce that it's struck a deal with Baidu to offer a free streaming channel of its music, and that it would also work with the search site to develop an ad-supported download service. EMI also says it's dropping its appeal against the latest decision for Baidu in the copyright case. It's heartening to see EMI take this step, and apparently realize that it needs to change it business, not hire better lawyers, to move ahead in China. Although it's probably unrelated, it should be noted that EMI last week fired its two top executives, following disappointing sales and, many analysts contend, the execs' inability to cope with an evolving market. Perhaps that move, along with the Baidu deal, reveals a change of tack for the company. What's still frustrating, though, is that here in the US, the RIAA and its member labels continue to rely on a courtroom- and legislative-based strategy, rather than changing their businesses to suit an evolving market -- and, of course, they continue to treat their customers like criminals.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
People don't want CD's, for the most part, the computer has become the digital hub for media content, and the industries are fighting a losing battle against that. They are trying to deny the people what they want. DRM content also isn't what people want, they want simple, easy to use, never fails, digital downloadable media content.
Why do so many people download illegally? Because that's the way they want their content, online, easy to find, easy to acquire, and always works.
Is it really that complicated that they haven't figured this out?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Good first step...
1) the cold hard financial facts of being blatantly outperformed make them finally realize their error, and they follow suit
2) they lose all their business to the labels that did #1, and they simply go bye-bye.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If ya can't join em...
That makes us even.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
up against the law
and, of course, they continue to treat their customers like criminals.
The courts and legistature are both of the government. What incentive do the **AA's have NOT to treat us as criminals when those to whom they're appealing do exactly that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
a glimmer of hope?
Too early to say, but definitely - watch this space.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]