Another Indie Record Store Learns To Adapt
from the good-news dept
While Tower Records collapsed when they weren't flexible enough to cope with the opportunities (and challenges) presented by the internet, we've pointed out repeatedly that doesn't mean all music stores need to go out of business. Independent music stores, in particular, have done a much better job figuring out how to adapt in the changing world. Some have become more like clubs that also sell music. Others have become their own record labels or destination sites. This difference between indies and dinosaurs like Tower may be most clearly demonstrated by the store Other Music, a popular indie record store in the East Village of Manhattan -- right across the street from where a huge Tower Records was. Going to Other Music is like a pilgrimage for many people -- though, a potentially disconcerting one, as it's not organized like other record stores. However, Wired News has an interview with the owner of the store about its efforts to offer its own online download store. They'll be selling completely DRM-free MP3s, recorded at 320 Kbps. However, more importantly, it looks like they recognize where their value comes in: in recommending good music. With so much music out there, Other Music's focus has always been on cutting through the crap and pointing you to the really good stuff -- and they're looking to do the exact same thing online. In other words, they're looking at where they can actually add value and going there, rather than fretting about how their existing marketplace has been shifting away from CDs.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Feel it in my water
I can feel a social networking site coming soon.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Feel it in my water
How many WTF's did that post just garner?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Schizophrenia
OTOH, that value is based on selling high-bitrate MP3s that can be placed on a torrent as fast as the first copy can be purchased, and based on information (e.g. ratings and recommendations) that can be mined, or simply used as a tool to find what's hot so it too can be torrented.
OTOF (on the other foot), if the store is successful in its approach and sells a virtual ton of MP3s, then that tends to shoot a hole in that entire zero-scarcity argument, since apparently people are willing to pay for music, and do so directly. The fact that they also have recommendations is a mote point: EVERY online store of any size, from iTMS to Amazon and on down has them.
Or to quote a famous philosopher, "A difference that makes no difference is no difference."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
errrr...
Easy on the green stuff buddy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Schizophrenia
I'm in two minds about that. ITOM I am happy because they've already proved a business model by surviving for 10 years. That model is a selective aggregation and filtering, read "tastefullness". People will pay for taste, like a good quality tea. But, as your voices are telling you, if they go to the net then that taste is infinitely replicatable at zero cost. It almost only works because they are a (physical - brick and mortar) store.
"A difference that makes no difference is no difference
That was Newton on the differential limit right?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What drives file-sharing?
Of course, this is based on my own presumtion: that most folks are basically honest. Anyone who holds the opposite opinion is likely to draw other conclusions. Still, I do think it's worthwhile to ask just how much the corporate attempt to rigidly control music is driving the culture that's fighting to prevent that control.
I suspect that if this were strictly artists vs. file-sharers, the FS's would simply be called "thieves".
Bookman
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Survival
Those that survived have survived by adapting, or at the very least recognizing where they do add value, and holding firm to those tenets. They recognize that there's more than just having the lowest price, that service is worth something. Deal with the threat once (chain store opening up across the street) and the next "threat" (online "pirates") don't seem so threatening, because you already have your "identity" (that which brings people to your business over someone else's) established, as this article says.
Whether music has DRM in it does not change the behavior of those buying. For those who buy to share, having DRM-free music reduces the number of steps to share the music (it's not like it's impossible), but it doesn't change the fact that people who are sharers share and people who aren't, don't. The MPAA/RIAA could learn a lot from these Indies that have survived...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"indepdendent"?
What exactly makes a music store "independent"? In what way was Tower "dependent", and on what?
By "independent", do you really mean "smaller"?
By the way, your comment preview function loses the Subject field.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]