SEC Paves The Way For Market-Based Stock Options Expensing

from the cisco-revisited dept

Since the SEC started requiring companies to expense employee stock options, there have been a few notable attempts at finding market-based methods for deriving the value of these options, in hopes that such a method will result in a more accurate measure than Black-Scholes, an academic formula used for valuing options. In 2005, the SEC rejected a proposal put forth by Cisco that would have seen the company create a public market in its own stock options. It hinted that it liked the idea, but that it needed more work before it could be put into practice. This past December, Google announced a program whereby its employees could sell their stock options to private investors. The purpose of this was simply to give its employees more liquidity and an opportunity to profit sooner, but it seemed to open the door to further exploration of how markets could be used to measure the value of options. Now the SEC has given the green light on a new experiment put forth by Zions Bancorp that appears to be very similar to the one proposed by Cisco. Basically, the company created a batch of securities that mimic its own employee options and then sold them to the public. The market price of these options is then the price used to expense their own options. And as many had predicted, the market price for these options did indeed come in well below what Black-Scholes valued them at, meaning that a company using this method should be able to lower the amount it expenses. It's still not clear exactly where things will go from here, in terms of further developing these markets, but the SEC's actions should be seen as good news, particularly for the tech companies that are reliant on stock options as an important form of compensation.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.