Maine Doesn't Want Lobbyists To Pressure Politicians While They're Voting
from the as-if-that-makes-a-difference dept
We've seen plenty of governments ban the use of laptops or email devices during governing sessions -- though, the usual reason is to keep politicians from goofing off when they should be paying attention. However, up in Maine, they've come up with a different reason: to keep lobbyists from pressuring politicians as they make their votes. This is interesting, because it shows just how far some lobbyists tend to go in pushing their viewpoints on politicians -- but a bigger question is whether or not this even makes any sense? It seems highly unlikely that a last minute email from a lobbyist is going to convince a politician one way or the other. And, if it does, then that should say a lot more about the politician in question than it does about the fact that politicians are allowed to check email while debating and voting on bills.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
democracy?
Sounds a bit like electoral college system when you think about it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wow...
As for "last minute emails"- communication like that should not be going on while voting is in process (as the article suggests). Leave the lobbying for before the voting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
one email to change it all
they just need to ban lobbyists altogether, since the public doesn't have lobbyists, it doesn't serve the public interest, but just private corporations with the money and power to sway votes.
but then the political system in most countries, especially the USA, is just corrupt as hell and broken.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Affects of Publicly Funded Elections?
80% of Maine's house were "Clean Candidates" representatives who took no money when they ran for office but rather received a fixed competitive amount from the state. If a challenger spent more, they received matching funds.
The voters like Clean Candidates.
Perhaps lobbyists finding out that their money isn't working so well anymore are looking for new avenues to sneak in an opinion and "Clean" headed representatives aren't pleased about it.
Is this the next evolution of a state that goes "Clean"?
To find out about movements to get Clean Money in states and federal government. Check out:
www.publicampaign.org (States)
www.just6dollars.org (Federal)
www.CAclean.org (California)
Here's an interesting analysis tool that shows winners and losers and the money they had. Compare Arizona and Maine to other states. (Connecticut has not had a Clean Election yet).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Great Idea!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]