Why Blackboard's Decision Not To Sue Open Source Providers Over Patents Is Nothing To Cheer About
from the that-doesn't-help-much dept
Just as the US Patent Office has agreed to review Blackboard's e-learning patents, the company has announced that it won't try to enforce its patents (current and future) against open source e-learning software providers or against universities who build their own, in-house, solutions. Instead, they'll simply focus on for-profit competitors. While that's a relief to those open source groups and universities, it's unfortunate that those same groups have "endorsed" the move. These organizations shouldn't need permission to innovate or promises that some company won't enforce their broad and obvious patents. Instead, they need a system that lets them continue to innovate without having to worry about these sorts of legal issues or beg a company to give them a pass. They should be pointing out how much needless trouble this process put them through. Even though the end result may have worked out for them, this shouldn't be an issue that they had to face at all.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Well, to be fair...
But anyway. It goes on to say what Blackboard have patented, including this gem: "a central feature of Blackboard's software: the ability to grant different people, such as students and teachers, different access rights to online resources"
Ye gods. They've invented user-based access control.
Hands up anyone who can't think of five examples of prior art straight off the top of their head...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Free Enterprise
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I'd say that the patent is still a direct threat to free software despite the patent pledge because it will
1. Restrict commercial entities from contributing software,
2. Limit adoption by restricting the ability to provide support services for free software.
Makes the pledge worthless in my opinion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Free Enterprise means free competition and narrow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, to be fair
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Well, to be fair
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Uncomfortably numb
Once in a while, I'm reminded of a time when patents are sorely needed. From Eli Whitney to George Eby, the truly groundbreaking inventions warrant protection for the inventors, IMHO. Eby had to sue to get the royalties he deserved. His patent had spurred the marketer to set aside monies for him in advance.
Given frivolous patents and strong-arm techniques from the MPAA & RIAA, I don't pay attention to that noise any more. I guess that cranking up a noise machine and keeping it going produces a return on the investment. I suppose its impact is on the people who make the noise, e.g., they probably go deaf.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Open Source E-Learning
[ link to this | view in chronology ]