More Musicians Route Around Music Labels -- Go Direct To Retailers
from the new-models-forming dept
In the past, we've written about Starbucks' success in producing and selling CDs by artists such as Ray Charles and Bob Dylan. It appears that other retailers have taken notice. Rajesh writes in to point out the news that Target is now signing deals with "older" musicians, and will sell their CDs for $9.99. As Rajesh notes, these kinds of deals probably make sense for everyone. Without the record labels involved, the musicians conceivably get better deals, and while the retailers probably make some money on the music, the real benefit to them is in the advertising value and getting people into the store. It's been clear for a while that the only successful retailers of music now view music as a loss leader, which means that a store like Target probably isn't even all that interested in making money directly off CD sales, so long as it brings more people into the stores. For people who seem to think that their can be no other model for musicians other than signing big record label deals, here's yet another example of why that's wrong. That's not to say this is the right business model for all musicians -- but it's simply one of many alternatives that are starting to make themselves clear.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I agree that musicians can and should avoid the music industry, when they have the power to do it. Once a musician has made it big, the musician has all the power.
Unfortunately, Most musicians are not set. They need funding from record labels to promote them worldwide.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's a good point, but anything that breaks down the control the record industry has on the market is a good thing in my book. So, maybe it's going to be established artists that blaze the trail for new modes of distribution, but it will be the up-and-coming artists that will ultimately benefit from a more open, free market environment.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Overall, I can see established artists taking full advantage of this though.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The tighter you clench your fist...
And of course the expected reaction from the labels will be to try to "coerce" artists in to longer and more restrictive contracts preventing them from leaving the big labels and going to other methods. Just like the article that was posted yesterday, the big labels were in the prime position to take full advantage of digital distribution but the dropped the ball.
If they weren't so fixated on making the biggest score with the least effort they may have realized that they could have taken the lead and offered deals to retail stores for the artists. This would have kept them in the loop of distrbution, won the approval of artists (which would have draw in more undiscovered talent), and won the praise of us the consumer. And in the long run they could have been the big winner. But no they chose the easy route and opted for the quick score.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nothing new about....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Excellent.
As to the comment that someone should make it with the majors and then they'd have the "power". Well, yes. And then I woke up. The odds of making it with a major label are near zero. Many bands don't know this; they are certain that they'll make it, and that their music is completely new and will take the industry by storm.
:)
Even if you beat the odds and get a deal, it's hugely stacked against you. Just paying off your advance against royalties kills many a signed band. And of course if the band doesn't understand how the business works (the vast majority), they're ripe for the screwin!
So if someone's creative enough to figure out how to make a decent living (or better) finding another way to distribute their music, I applaud them!!!! Though the odds are still long, they would rise above zero!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The future is DIY
Its young, and not ready for prime-time; but its business model kicks ass.
basically artist upload their music, set the royalty rate they want; and fans who distribute their music earn sales commissions. Both the artist and users get paid cash.
the labels on't even know its coming; that is, the revolution.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A Whole New Source of Revenue for Musicians
T Man
http://www.stophairlosstoday.blogspot.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
i know of a group that was offered a record label deal, refused it because they were doing pretty good marketing themselves online, and the label actually made threats and told them how they'd make sure they fail. pretty outrageous but shows how scared the labels are.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
used to do this in the seventies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]