Optimistic Identity Theft Study Flawed
from the follow-the-money dept
Last week we pointed to a study claiming that identity theft is actually dropping, despite all of the hype in the media. But because the study was sponsored by a bank and a credit card company, both of which would have an interest in downplaying the identity theft threat, it seemed like there was ample reason to be skeptical of the study's conclusion. Now, holes are being poked (via 27B Stroke 6) in the results. Part of the problem, it seems, is that the firm conducting the survey only looked at simple, plain vanilla cases of identity theft, whereby one person pretends to be another. What they ignored is so-called "synthetic identity fraud", which involves creating an entirely new persona out of the personal information of multiple victims. This can be more damaging and harder to trace for those affected. In addition to the direct financial impact, it can also cause problems for people down the road, such as when they apply for loans, but are rejected due to something in their credit history. This kind of damage is also harder to quantify, as its costs are often felt more in time than in money. The study appears to have other flaws as well, each of which are favorable to the companies funding the research. While it can sometimes be a weak attack to cite the funders of study and claim a conflict of interest, in some cases it should indeed be a cause for concern.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Think twice
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yup
Yeah, you gotta be careful when using your own survey to further your argument. :P
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Excellent.
Now, does "one person pretends to be another" cover credit card number theft as well? If so, then I'd have to think that without numbers the "synthetic identity fraud" group might not be in itself large enough to compensate statistically.
If it doesn't cover credit card theft, then from my perspective the study is worthless, as that's the most common type of "pretending to be someone else".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Study flawed in method and theory
Even if the study was conducted fairly would it make a difference? The information is still being stolen and at the rates phishing and other security lapses have been going it will continue to cost the public a great deal. Instead of focusing so hard on stopping fraud the energy should go to stopping the problem in the first place.
[ link to this | view in thread ]