FCC Continues To Fudge Broadband Numbers
from the nice-try-there dept
The FCC has been called out repeatedly by the GAO for fudging the numbers on broadband penetration in the US, so it's no surprise at all to hear they're doing it again with the latest report. They're still using the highly questionable (and often questioned) method of assuming that if a single household in a zipcode can be served by a broadband provider, then all houses can be served by that provider. Tell that to the folks sitting smack dab in the middle of Silicon Valley, but who can't get DSL from AT&T. They also define broadband as anything over 200 kbit/s, which is increasingly not really broadband these days. However, even worse, is that they're hiding the growth of broadband connections, by suddenly lumping in cellular broadband accounts -- which seems quite a bit unfair, since the companies providing such services, such as Verizon Wireless, are quite clear that the service is not to be used as a DSL replacement. Hell, it's barely supposed to be used at all (despite the big "unlimited" claims in their ads). Rather, mobile broadband is only allowed for very limited applications (no video, no streaming, no downloads, no VoIP, etc.), and the providers are quick to cut you off if you violate any of their unstated rules. It seems a bit unfair to lump that in as a full "connection," but apparently that's the only way the FCC can convince people that broadband growth rates in the US are as high as they had hoped.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
DSL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DSL
Unlike real broad band
Dude, WTF are you talking about? There's no such thing as "broadband" - that's just marketese for "fast internet connection". ANY internet connection faster than dialup or ISDN falls under this marketing category. There is NO tech definition for "broadband".
So whatever - DSL, FiOS, muni-wifi, satellite, T1, OC12, cable, BoG, BoP, low flying blimps, cellular, magic pixie dust - if it's not dialup, you're in the club.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I don't get it...
Why is this such a hard concept for companies to follow?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: I don't get it...
In a normal business this is true...the more you reduce costs, and the better product, the better your business becomes. But unfortunatly when you add in all the government lobbies, subsidies on the telecom industry, and mandates that require the country to be a leader in communications technology; you change the motivation behind the study.
Essentially the better the telecom companies look, the less the government has to reconsider contracts, the less they need to lean on the companies for innovation, the more marketing value we get, and probably the more money the officials get in their pocket. So really the FCC does its best work by collecting raw data that is verifiable, but tweaking the conditions to make the 'facts' that they need.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why not count access by county
Is it a ploy by Comcast (cable provider) to keep subscribers from switching to DirecTV?
Guess I will wait for city-wide WiFi.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why not count access by county
Is it a ploy by cell phone service providers to keep subscribers from switching to different service?
I have this very same problem with cell phone providers. Right now only US Cellular serves my area and I get constant promises from Sprint/Nextel, Verizon, SunCom, Alltell, Cingular....you get the picture.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Cellular broadband
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lies lies lies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
when dial-up was king...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Broadband was deregulated in late 2005 and almost nobody made public comments to the FCC weeks prioer to them making their decision.
Congratulations, this is the result.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
In many of those asian areas (such as S. Korea) nearly all the population lives in giant apartment buildings. These each have a mini central office in the basement. Wiring them for broadband is MUCH easier than wiring anything but the most urban sections of the US - let alone the rural sections.
The US has counties larger than some European countries.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wrong Dossquatch WE are the people who made the word "Broadband" nothing more then marketing vernacular for high-speed Internet. It was the term used to describe a standard download and upload speed for an emerging new Internet infrastructure the Telco's swindled us out of to the tune of over $200 Billion dollars.
""http://www.newnetworks.com/ShortSCANDALSummary.htm""
With the exception of Public Broadcasting documentary about what is surely one of the most scandalous acts of consumer fraud ever committed against Americans, you see it gets little to no News Attention.
This is the kind of thing you'd expect a class action suit take place but that too, will never happen. Chris Bradley's assertion that America didn't show up to say stop this, so in his mind he seems to think we deserve it.
This logic is analogous to someone saying a girl was dressed to slutty so she was asking to be raped. This is just not true and I think his attitude that we got it coming for not speaking up is as assinine as his entire post was void of anything substantive. Just more finger pointing only he likes to blame the victims in this case.
Gee Chris,,was it our fault when the senate held an emergency session at 3:00 am to vote they all get a raise? Was it our fault that the Government didn't enforce the law making sure the telecoms used that money for getting all of us on 45 mbps connection speed LIKE THEY SAID THEY WOULD? Whether it was even technically feasible at the time or not, that didn't stop them from bilking the public.
So tell me,, in a country where bribing a Public Official is legal as long as it is done by a lobbyist, do you really believe showing up to say something to the FCC would have done a damn thing to stop it?
These guys are white collar crooks plane and simple and they have stolen our broadband which was at the time a standard of speed and not just a marketing term.
Do your damn homework before you start spewing all your monosyllabic diatribe like you think you know what you're talking about because the fact is,,
YOU DON'T.
Kent Perry, AZ.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]