Viacom's Deal With Joost Really Just A Bargaining Chip With YouTube?
from the Viacom-raises-the-stakes dept
Viacom is getting plenty of attention this morning for signing a deal to distribute some of its content via Joost, the tremendously hyped up peer-to-peer video streaming service created by the founders of Kazaa and Skype. Of course, given the recent decision by Viacom to demand its clips be taken off YouTube, almost every article is suggesting that Viacom did so in order to move forward with Joost. Except that Joost is different than YouTube. It's more about providing a television-like experience to viewing content, but doesn't (yet) have much of the community aspect of YouTube. Also, considering that Joost is still in private beta, it's hardly clear whether or not Joost will bring the large numbers of viewers that YouTube automatically did. About the only thing that the deal with Joost is good for right now is for Viacom to go back to the folks at Google/YouTube and say "look, Joost is willing to pay us money!" in the hopes that it will convince YouTube to pay out as well.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Moral of the story....Never look free distribution and promotion in the mouth.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I checked out the viacom official clips... the difference is what is made available and how its presented.
Someone at comedy central decides what part of the show will make the clips. The Youtube (user generated versions) are usually more to my liking.
I could care less that its gootube or whoever, my point is that user posted clips are almost always better than the shiny hand selected corp ones.
I mean seriously someone is going through all that trouble to capture (maybe edit) and upload that video...for free!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
As long
I start up a funny and successfull show and then months later people all over the net are posting fan made clips of my show.
That is called word of mouth advertising. I don't have to spend as much on marketing because the fans are doing some of the work for me. As long as they acknowledge that the clips are from my show and they dont alter them then I don't see the problem.
Oh yes I do. The corporate mentality is to control everything and get as much money as possible now at the price of the long term.
[ link to this | view in thread ]