Deal Between AT&T And Yahoo May Be Nearing Its End

from the looking-back dept

Portal deals, like the longstanding partnership between SBC (now AT&T) and Yahoo, have never made much sense to us. Other than the brand name, Yahoo didn't bring much substantial to the table, and it's not clear that the Yahoo brand name really meant very much to customers that were in the market for broadband. So it's no surprise that when the agreement expires in April 2008, things may be scaled back dramatically. According to the Wall Street Journal the two parties are currently in negotiations to figure out what, if anything, the future holds for the partnership. AT&T's reluctance to fork over a reported $200 to $250 million on an annual basis for the use of Yahoo's brand name makes a lot of sense, particularly since the company seems perfectly capable of signing up DSL customers on its own. While the Journal article gets all of the above correct, it offers some other strange reasons why AT&T might want a change. It notes, for example, that Google has been making big payments to partners like Dell, MySpace and the music labels, whose videos appear on YouTube, and that AT&T would rather be on the receiving end of a deal like that, rather than paying off Yahoo. But Google's deals are of an entirely different nature than AT&T's deal with Yahoo, so the comparison is useless. In each of Google's deals, it's paying for something that it needs, or finds valuable, whether it's content, eyeballs or users (as in the Dell deal). What kind of deal would have Google make payments to AT&T? Perhaps AT&T thinks Google would pay to be the official home page of AT&T customers -- actually, we already know that CEO Ed Whitcare thinks every company should pay up to get in front of AT&T users. When the Yahoo agreement does finally conclude, AT&T's best strategy would probably be to walk away from it, and save itself some money. Any hope that it'll be able to sign a directly lucrative deal is just wishful thinking.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Pooper Scooper, 9 Mar 2007 @ 3:07pm

    Agreeing with Joe

    The deal made sense back in the dot-com days when people who understood the power of the internet, and aggrigation of news and data was percieved as a mystery to the big telcos.

    Knowing that AT&T wants to get into the quad-play arena, and seeing the current landscape, it's not tough to understand why the Yahoo-AT&T deal can be seen somewhat like a marginalized asset, especially with the successful mergers and buy-outs that Google has participated in over the last year (read: YouTube) which would be more complementary to AT&Ts goals.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    JJ, 11 Mar 2007 @ 5:26pm

    maybe

    Maybe it has nothing to do with sales and more to do with managing e-mail.

    AT&T has consistantly proven how backwards their IT is. I really have little to 0 confidence in any IT infrastructures that AT&T is responsible for (besides their main focus of being a telephone network). Having a stable company such as Yahoo, manage that part of the ISP for them, makes sense.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.