Google Will Start Removing Identifying Data From Search Logs
from the about-time dept
Given that Google searches are being used in court cases as evidence and the supposed big business of selling user data, it's good to see that Google has decided that it's going to start purging data in its search logs. Prior to this, it logged and kept everything, from searches to IP addresses. In other words it's a data retention lover's dream database. Of course, they're only going to purge the data that's over 18 months old, so they'll still be hanging onto plenty of data for quite some time. Of course, as Jim Harper notes, Google's choice of wording here is a bit bizarre, as it claims it will start making the data "more" anonymous. Harper points out that (like pregnancy) anonymity should be a binary function -- it either is or is not anonymous, so he's curious about the modifier.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Some change...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google is a privacy disaster
Google's privacy policy is a disaster that goes way beyond any snooping tendencies of governments.
For example, on the right I see you have 'ads by Google'. and Google analytics on that page. Those two things are more than enough for a Google employee to identify me from this comment.
They have my IP address at submission time and the adsense cookie, both of which can be matched up to other sites I surf until my identity is resolved.
This Google privacy fix really doesn't go far enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
anonymous
If you put together anonymous data from multiple sources, you could know enough to make the collection of data not anonymous.
Get over it. Most people don't care enough about you to want to know about you, and the ones who do, already know about you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why we want our search usage to be anonymous
If you sicked smart people on analyzing each user's search data you could presumably generate lists of ip addresses
-> with particular political views
-> with a particular religion
The fear is that when the government goes fully fascist on us, it used to be quite an involved task to generate the list of people to be executed. The Nazi's had to conduct a census & then hire IBM to analyze the results before they got the trains to the death camps rolling.
I guess the government already has their own census data; but it's no where near as good as Google's data for drawing up seating charts for trains to death camps.
The existence of a well organized single source of data about the best educated portion of the population's political views is a dictator's wet dream. It would be prudent to avoid creating this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why we want our search usage to be anonymous
I noted that of all places, the cops went nuts at an annual successful fun "Critical Mass" bike ride in San Fran in I think '95. A community organizer who had worked with cops and businesses and city officials was attacked, his professional video camera taken. Why SF? Reputation of "hippiedom" in that zip code?
At the time, mayor was Willie Brown. The same Willie Brown who was reportedly notified by his friend Condi Rice on Sept 10 to NOT FLY the next day. I'd have to guess he's in cahoots with Washington, like so many Latin American dictators and the CIA.
My memory fails, but I think "Hippiedom 2", Madison, WI, was also targetted for some extra spicy police action.
The point is, in decades past, mere acts of peaceful protest were met the response of anything from clubs to guns to machine guns -- Ludlow, CO; Matewan, WV; Fred Hampton's apartment in Chicago; and ML King's balcony in TN (a court finally found for the plaintiffs (with Lawyer William Pepper, with new evidence) against the US Army and other govt officials. So being "good" and "innocent" is not enough, if you're the wrong kind of good.
Well, they got me by my website.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Be proactive in protecting your privacy. However, doing all you can still won't protect you completely. As long as you have a name and/or a social security number, your information is someones for the taking.
You don't want to get caught up in a mess, don't do anything wrong. Those that fly straight have nothing to hide!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ads Galore
Perhaps just like in recent films, we will see a time when simply walking by a shop or store will activate an "individual" specific targeted Ad!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
For once I agree
"You don't want to get caught up in a mess, don't do anything wrong. Those that fly straight have nothing to hide!"
Usually I laugh at that, but in this case it fits well. As long as you're a citizen in this country then you information is not secret and you are not anonymous. But we like to think we are.
What's is there to stop the person at the DMV or Dept of Vital records from keeping the copies of information you have to give them in order to get what you came for? Nothing, oh wait they have policies, riiiight.
If I'm going to do something that I'm afraid someone else might find out about I won't be doing it on the Internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonimity is NOT a binary function...
The argument "(like pregnancy) anonymity should be a binary function -- it either is or is not anonymous" is completely bogus.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Don't ask don't tell & don't read my diary
Define 'Wrong'. For example US army has a 'don't ask don't tell policy', I search for information on the gay scene in my area. As part of an investigation on me, they find I search gay dating sites, so they have to kick me out of my job. Was I doing wrong?
"If I'm going to do something that I'm afraid someone else might find out about I won't be doing it on the Internet."
That's everything:
I don't want Google to know who I am when I make this comment, because Google can financially damage me.
I don't want my mom to see the porn sites I search for.
I don't want my wife to see the new car sites I search for.
I don't want my insurance company to see my search for medical conditions.
I don't want the airline company to see I've booked the hotel and have to fly on a certain date no matter how expensive the ticket.
I don't want that creepy old woman down the street from reading my email.
I don't want the washing machine company knowing when I search for 'competing brand'.
I don't want any of them to know squat about me, and that is why we have privacy, and I'd like Google to respect that privacy, and if they refuse, I'd like my government to drag their sorry little asses into court until they do respect privacy.
This measure is not good enough, not even close to good enough.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Don't ask don't tell & don't read my diary
You don't wear your thong / butt plug / hot leather pants to places you where you don't want folks to know you're into (insert fetish here) and likewise you shouldn't search for things that might one day come back to haunt you.
If you DO need to research a sensitive topic, do like the other poster offered and be proactive about your privacy BEFORE you search.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"You don't want to get caught up in a mess, don't do anything wrong. Those that fly straight have nothing to hide!"
... always makes me fear for my fellow man. And myself.
It's what you don't know that will get you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Privacy
Google needs data to make their engines and ads track better, its why today's internet uses google rather than alta-Vista. Thats why they keep data in the first place... not to track you, but to track searches... ip's are needed in this to determine how geography influences the searches.
Purging that data after use is prudent, and when is just a matter of diligence.
Ultimately... if your doing something wrong, then your either dumb and need to be caught, or using the various tools available to mask your identity anyway...
As to "trains to Gulag"... if and when the government decides to purge a particular demographic, just know it'll be the next day before you find out, and it'll be too late to stop it. You just have to speak out before they come to get you.
i.e. War on Drugs (really... war on drugs we don't profit from), or War on Terror (meaning, war on terrorists we no longer sponsor), or My favorite... War on Poverty (while we cut taxes for the rich and slash welfare spending)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Privacy
Dewy, Just want to thank you for stating that so clearly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When "they" take charge of your information...
GET OVER IT!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No James, YOU get over it
I visit a website like Techdirt it uses Google analytics, and Google notes my IP and page.
My own volition? No.
I visit a site, it serves up a Google advert and Google servers note my IP.
My own volition? No.
Even when I use Google search engine, I did not agree that Google could use that data for anything other than delivering me the result. Not explicitly not implicitly.
I did not agree that those pieces of data could be linked or stored.
And of course, you cannot agree to waive my rights on my behalf.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No James, YOU get over it
http://www.google.com/terms_of_service.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Simple solution?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Simple solution?
Yes, you are misinformed, for the most part. If you use a router, they may not be able to see the specific computer that made the request, but they would still know the public IP address that made the query.
All they'd have to do then is see which ISP owns that IP, subpoena the logs from the ISP and find which account owned the IP address at the time.
Your response then could be something like "oh, well, I'm behind a router, so you can't prove it was MY computer that made this query". Their response would be "It's YOUR router, right? And all of YOUR computers are presumably behind YOUR router... so who gives a shit? This is obviously your data".
Now, if you had a public Wi-Fi connection, or shared a connection with someone else, or even just removed password protection from your wireless router, you could perhaps give a reasonable doubt to your actually performing the search.
But if we're living in fascist Germany in the '30s, we're all screwed anyway. Unless you're living in current day communist China, some screwed up place in the middle-east, or a hell-hole in Africa, you're fine. Though you might want to watch your back if you're living in the Sovi... er, Russia too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Simple solution?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
last 2 bytes
If you are stupid enough to believe that google do not use the information you provide, then you need to have your intelligence boosted by replacing your brain with a baked potato.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sure - that's great for fascists, tyrants, and communists. No in a free society.
Just because I'm not doing anything illegal doesn't mean I want everyone to know what's going on in my life. People like a bit of privacy - seriously - do you have curtains or blinds at all? If so - obviously, you understand that concept to a point then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the gulag passenger list
I love the near immediate access to information that google makes possible. I've become dependent both professionally and personally on the searches, features and gadgets. I have several google accounts, including personalized home pages that are attached to my email at the domain that I own. I use google earth on a regular basis. Google's stock charts are among the most convenient to use. Etc., etc.
I have no illusions about my privacy. So far, google's actions and policies seem benign. Nevertheless, I'm beginning to see google as having the potential to dominate the internet the way that microsoft dominates operating systems. It's worth paying attention and speaking up about google policy -- absolute power...etc.
I recommend that people keep using their google tracked rights to freedom of speech and access to information right up until they start loading the train for the gulag.
By that time, if your not already on the passenger list from your signed letters to the editor, your blog, your websites, etc. then you will be part of the problem...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
First one, then the other
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: First one, then the other
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
wow
I saw an FBI sheet once, that showed criteria for identifying white seperatists and other groups that could possibly be considered revolutionary or terrorist in nature. I technically should be on the list because I have bought books on network security, hacking, religion, go to church, own a gun (more than one), have been to gun shows, was homeschooled at one point, have studied military history and martial arts, the list goes on. I found it amusing since being anti-American, revolutionary, or terrorist is pretty much counter my personality.
If I were going to be paranoid, google having my IP would be the least of my worries.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
IPs Don't always Identify you!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
no records
heard of this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]