What Was It The Entertainment Industry Said About Not Killing Off New Consumer Devices?
from the another-one-bites-the-dust dept
As the entertainment industry has pushed for new and more draconian laws to protect their old business model, groups like the EFF and the Consumer Electronics Association have pointed out that many of the laws the industry wants would have outlawed innovations like TiVo or the iPod. In response, the entertainment industry swore up and down that they'd never try to stop such innovative devices. So what's happened since? Well, the entertainment industry has basically tried to sue every such new innovative device. Earlier today we wrote about the lawsuits against XM's music recording device and now a judge has ruled in favor of Hollywood studios banning a digital video recorder offering. Announced almost exactly a year ago, Cablevision wanted to basically offer a service similar to what you get from a TiVo, but where they would host the infrastructure, and you would just get the functionality at your home (rather than needing to install the box locally). It's not a bad idea, but Time Warner Cable had already tried it and the project got neutered when content providers freaked out (again, even though it's really no different than a TiVo). Cablevision, however, is a bit of a maverick on these things, so when it didn't give in to the studios' demands, the studios sued. It's difficult to understand the judge's position here. Effectively, the service is no different than TiVo -- which is allowed under copyright law. Cablevision will likely appeal the decision, so this is far from over. However, in the meantime, this is yet another example of the entertainment industry killing off new devices and services -- something they insisted would never happen -- in order to protect obsolete business models.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Now boys and girls...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
innovation
Simple answer: Content providers want me to pay for content more than once. Twice isn't enough either. It's not enough that I buy a DVD. I need to buy another copy online to put it on my iPod. If technology is allowed to advance fast enough, they will lose the ability to fleece me for more money.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ummm...
Seriously though, don't you feel like the GIECO Caveman should be standing there behind you reading this and saying just that.
Who really believed the Entertainment Industry when they made that promise anyway?
We don't need innovation! Just get more lawyers and sue it out of them!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Tivo, CableVision, and next up?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The next gen of TV cards will be crippled, in some way, to make it extremely difficult to record shows.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh Poor Sonic Blue
Now you are gone, bankrupt from legal fees. But the music and movie industry would NEVER stop innovation, or new devices...not them
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Allow opting out, but also allow opting in
Stifling cable's advance in technology stifles advances in innovation of content. The internet did not have the same hurdles as cable which allowed popular YouTube to thrive in one, but not exist in the other.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Internet allows users to choose their content, when they get it, how they get it, where they get it, and why. Cable, does not offer the same tools. Questioner hit the nail on the head when he said that cable SHOULD be more internet like. We won't see that happen thought until content providers realize that consumers want & need choice.
Why products and services like TiVO work is because they allow the user to choose when they watch a show. AFAIK (Don't own one myself :( ) you have to watch the commercials whilst watching your show for the first time, the commercials are still there. There are shows on tv that I would watch if I were home while they were airing, but, alas like almost all half civilized people, I do have a job that I am required to be at in order to get the cash to pay for the show. If I pay for the service, I should be able to use said service how I see fit. If that means I want to hold a superbowl party on my nice (read:Non-existant{SP?}) 64 inch plasma panel television then so be it.
The real problem is that the govt listens to money and money only. Consumer protection is secondary to corporate. Don't complain about the companies, they'll never change. Complain to & about the Govt.
My $.02
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Heinlein said it almost 70 years ago...
statute or common law. Neither corporations or individuals have the right to come into court and ask that the clock of history be stopped, or turned back.
- Robert Heinlein, "Life Line", 1939
[ link to this | view in thread ]
yep, it's the government
I do appreciate TechDirt as a place to log these egregious and idiotic moves by foolish and disconnected ultra-wealthy people who insist on hewing to a model that has clearly been superseded. We're coming to the same conclusion, though, over and over. The RIAA and the MPAA are--to us, anyway--very clearly engaged in pouring money on the problem. It eclipses Prohibition in its scope. Violations are rampant; it used to be only once a week that I'd overhear someone at work talking about content that they'd gotten illegally. Now it's at least daily.
Where's the tipping point, I wonder? When will someone realized that 200 million Elvis fans with pirated content can't be wrong?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Judge Chin to get credit
"The RS-DVR is not a stand-alone machine that sits on top of a television," said Chin. "Rather, it is a complex system that involves an ongoing relationship between Cablevision and its customers."
I think I get it. My neighbor (Cablevision) offers to record from my cable subscription for a fee, but there are additional strings attached. I will only have access to the built-up library while I am paying my neighbor two fees:
a) The recording service fee, and
b) the cable subscription (which my neighbor sells to me).
My neighbor is acting exactly as though he is taking ownership of the library and renting it out for profit.
The judge saw through the ownership scam, but I hope the technology was left open for content providers who might choose to opt in to the recordings.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Consumer Devices....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
not quite the same though
It may be argued that this is small, but it is fundamental and a line that does make a difference.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Can't stop it
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Another Clinton appointee
You know, for the Hollywood crown?
Wait, Hollywood is big supporters of......
....Democrats?
hmmm.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Another Clintonista hard at work.
You know, for the Hollywood crown?
Wait, Hollywood is big supporters of......
....Democrats?
hmmm.
[ link to this | view in thread ]