Driving While Texting Bans Starting To Take Off

from the what's-next...? dept

A couple of weeks ago, it was reported that the Washington state legislature was considering a ban on driving while texting, and now some politicians in New Jersey want to see the same for their state. Of course, these laws are just the latest in a long strong of laws that are designed to make it illegal to drive while distracted. Except, of course, you can't have a blanket law that makes it illegal to be distracted -- that would be impossible -- so legislatures are trying to accomplish this in piecemeal fashion, going after one distraction at a time. The state assemblyman behind the New Jersey ban doesn't seem to have a good understanding of text messaging, since he claims it requires drivers to completely take their eyes off the road, which many people who send text messages would probably dispute. Furthermore, his own data in support of the law undermines his claim. According to the research he cites, one in five drivers has dashed out a text message while driving (you might want to take the figures with a grain of salt, since it's not clear where they're coming from). But if that were true, then you'd expect a lot more SMS-related accidents, if it really is as dangerous as he claims. Of course, this debate really misses the bigger point: it make sense for the police to flag drivers that are driving recklessly, but since there are so many possible distractions, from screaming children in the back seat to distracting billboards, going after these things on a case-by-case basis doesn't make much sense.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Max Lyon, 27 Mar 2007 @ 9:59pm

    Call me stupid but....

    ...Seems kind of silly. How do they plan on enforcing these laws?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Andy, 27 Mar 2007 @ 10:03pm

    Max, the police enforce it by texting each other when they see someone disobeying these law.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    endojoe, 27 Mar 2007 @ 10:05pm

    well....

    Sodomy laws end up being enforced somehow too...I don't have to be looking to text personally, it's like changing the radiostation...or talking...oh wait...talking on the phone is against the law too...unless I'm 'singing along with the radio' on my hands free...prove any of it. But we'll all still have to pay the law sharks on both sides of the case. Lets all go be Lawyers, the only ones who always win with this shit.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Mark Devlin, 27 Mar 2007 @ 10:08pm

    Driving while distracted

    Make of this what you will...

    http://www.japantoday.com/jp/news/401084

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Joseph Durnal, 28 Mar 2007 @ 5:07am

    Common Sense

    I almost back ended someone recently while checking the blackberry. I wasn't sending, just checking to see what all the buzzing was about, but taking my eyes off the road for just a second or two caused me not to notice right away that the cars in front of me were stopping for no good reason and I had to hit the breaks pretty hard. I figured that reading the blackberry wasn't such a good idea. Now, I at least wait until I'm stopped at a light! Do they need laws for this sort of thing? I don't think so, I think most folks have a little more common sense than we give them credit for. Besides, there are a lot more distractions than text messages etc.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    |333173|3|_||3, 28 Mar 2007 @ 5:38am

    Re: Common Sense

    At least they have more than you do.

    Being distracted is nowhere near as dangerous as some of the stupid manoeuvres I have seen carried out (like driving up footpaths, U-turns accross a median strip, going the wrong way around a roundabout)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    thecaptain, 28 Mar 2007 @ 5:43am

    I weep that there are people stupid enough that we NEED a law like this in effect.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Wizard Prang, 28 Mar 2007 @ 7:01am

    Don't we already have a law...

    ...for driving without due care and attention?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 28 Mar 2007 @ 7:15am

    Re:

    laws wont cure stupidity! Punishing folks dont make em smarter....

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Solo, 28 Mar 2007 @ 9:26pm

    We the People

    Ban children in cars.
    Ban radios.
    Ban pets.
    Ban nose picking.
    Ban ear picking.
    Ban scratching.
    Ban itching.
    Ban eating.
    Ban drinking.

    But to make us the safest, we should ban the greatest danger of all:

    Ban driving.

    ---

    We elect the politics to serve us, not to treat us like children that need protection despite our own will.

    Unfortunately that is the theory. Practically, politics belong to a different cast, that is to many of us, entitled to treat us like children.

    One would think that with the power to vote, people would know better and make better choices. Wrong again.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    poster, 29 Mar 2007 @ 9:53am

    Ideas?

    They need to please pass a law banning women putting on make-up while they're driving.
    And I'm a woman, so don't say I'm being sexist. Besides, I've never seen a man putting on make-up while driving, whereas I've been in several near misses with women who've been doing it.

    Okay, but seriously, what do you guys think would actually work in getting people to stop texting/putting on make-up/reading newspapers (I almost got into an accident with a woman who was reading a newspaper while driving, she had the entire thing open and set on her steering wheel as she drove) while driving? Since no one likes the laws...what might work?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    ytyy, 5 Oct 2007 @ 2:42pm

    yyy

    6774

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.