USDA Rural Broadband Program A Cautionary Tale

from the canary-in-the-coalmine dept

Wed, May 2nd 2007 10:17am — Joseph Weisenthal

Despite the many flaws with the Universal Service Fund (USF), there are still some people out there that think it should be greatly expanded, so that it can subsidize the buildout of rural broadband. Although the lack of broadband remains a problem in rural areas, it's really hard to see how the USF would solve the problem, considering how ineffective the program has been. It turns out that the USDA already runs a small (by government standards) program to help subsidize rural broadband (via Broadband Reports), which -- surprise, surprise -- is riddled with problems. Congressmen are threatening to revoke the program's funding after learning that it's been subsidizing loans in areas where there's already broadband, while ignoring areas that aren't served at all. You can be sure that whatever problems this small USDA program is having will be greatly magnified if it were to be adopted on a larger scale, so hopefully politicians see this as a warning sign.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

14 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

_Jon, 2 May 2007 @ 11:04am

I read a report (somewhere) where an energy company (possibly Consumers Energy) is beginning a trial with a company to provide broadband via the electrical lines.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
James Stevens, 2 May 2007 @ 11:23am

No broadband blows
I'm about 6 miles out of a city with approx. 17,000 people... I'm on the main highway running out of the city and we don't have broadband access. So we're left with 3 choices: satellite (which isn't too good for gaming and uploading), wireless broadband (good, but expensive like satellite, to get all the equipment set up it's $500 and then $50/month), and dial-up which is $10/month. I ended up switching to wireless broadband but it's really a pain that there's no cable lines a mere 6 miles out of the city; this plan definitely isn't working in my area and we're not even that rural; it sucks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Chris, 2 May 2007 @ 11:30am

Re: No broadband blows
I'm in the same boat, but I literally live across the street from the city limits. I have no cable or dsl availability. I had to go with wireless internet myself. It beats satellite but it still sucks compared to cable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike, 2 May 2007 @ 12:50pm

Don't complain- my only high-speed option is satellite at 79.95/month.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Derek Kerton (profile), 2 May 2007 @ 1:29pm

Trade-Offs
How about we urbanites subsidize rural broadband when the ruralites subsidize my urban access to empty roads, clean air, open spaces, less noise and light pollution, shorter wait-lines, and a bigger house and land?

There are trade-offs to where we choose to live. There are sacrifices to living in the city. There should also be sacrifices to living in the country. If free markets can reduce the sacrifices, then let's find the way. But if it takes my tax dollars, then I'm not interested.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous of Course, 2 May 2007 @ 2:00pm

Trade-Offs and a point missed.
I live in a rural area where my only access is over
30 year old FDM lines with a 22.6K connection looking
pretty good. When the lines are working.

But I'm not complaining about that. I AM complaining
that billions of dollars of tax payer's money has been
spent on improving connectivity and the corporations
involved took that money and then cherry picked the
markets. The nearby town already had cable modem
access to broadband and DSL but the money goes there
instead of to the outlaying areas for which it was
intended.

Oh, there is all the dark fiber that was laid but no
upgrade to the CO until they can carry TV and other
crap to bundle up with the broadband.

Don't forget... I'm not debating IF this subsidy should
be in place. Personally I don't think it's fair to
expect my broadband access be subsidized. I'm upset that
right or wrong the BILLIONS have been spent and there's
diddly-squat to show for it. Some of that money was my
tax dollars as well.

So I've subsidzed the broadband access of people living
in town, not the other way around. Or more correctly,
the operations of broadband providers that took that
money then didn't deliver the service.

Screw the telco. A 5GHz back haul link isn't expensive.
All I need is some roof space and a DSL line in town.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 2 May 2007 @ 2:34pm

Re: Trade-Offs and a point missed.
Screw the telco. A 5GHz back haul link isn't expensive. All I need is some roof space and a DSL line in town.
So you say, but yet you haven't done it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
rEdEyEz, 2 May 2007 @ 3:24pm

Don't blame the corporations...
From the article:
"If you don't fix this, I guarantee you this committee will," House Agriculture Committee Chairman Collin C. Peterson (D-Minn.) told James M. Andrew, administrator of the Rural Utilities Service at the U.S. Department of Agriculture. "I don't know why it should be this hard."

Key word: "subsidy"
Problem: committee subsidy OVERSIGHT

In my many years of working in the world of engineering, I have never met a contractor that will OFFER you "something more" than YOU asked/paid for, nor will they DO more than YOU asked/paid for.

...looks like SOMEONE took the money and ran...

Hmmm, I'd bet that money went to districts/companies to help pay off election/appointee supporters...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Rick, 2 May 2007 @ 3:28pm

I'm trying to find a house outside a town of about 20,000 people in northern Michigan, but it's becoming impossible to find one with broadband access. I earn my living online, so it's a necessity.

I'd really love to live there, but it's sad to see myself considering not moving where I dream to live because I can't access the internet properly.

I honestly doubt the government cares.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Charles Griswold, 2 May 2007 @ 4:19pm

Re:
I honestly doubt the government cares.

Bingo. Individual people (including public employees and elected officials) may care, but the government is not a thinking, feeling entity. It does not care.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous of Course, 3 May 2007 @ 6:39am

Re: Re: Trade-Offs and a point missed.
I'm working on it. I have to find a site in
town with a willing landlord and a clear view
of my hill.

The newer equipment which runs on POE makes the
installation a breeze and it's license free so
no dinking with the FCC.

In the mid-70's, last time I installed a microwave
data link, it was more difficult, expensive and
provided less bandwidth.

It's also not a high priority because I commute
to work where bandwidth is plentiful.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
frank burns, 3 May 2007 @ 2:29pm

Rural Broadband
Hi There, I'm located 300klms from the nearest city of Perth in Western Australia and I too, are in a remote rural corner. I have the technology & services here for ADSL from Telstra. Perhaps if you were to negotiate a deal with Telstra they may help you override the difficulties that you're having. The Australian Government adopted a plan with Telstra's involvement (HIBIS) to get all rural & remote subscribers on line in par with our city counterparts. Well, it worked and as a consumer of these services I haven't looked back at the days when I was on dial-up. Good Luck.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
David Hagan, 4 May 2007 @ 9:48am

Rural Broadband
It is very important to develop a broadband map of America. This map would provide an infrastructure assessment of broadband availability throughout the U.S. Coupling this map with public reporting of actual broadband speeds, reliability, and prices would allow broadband build-out to be done more efficiently.

Take a look at what has been accomplished by ConnectKentucky at http://www.connectkentucky.org. There are some states that are successfully developing partnerships to expand broadband penetration into rural areas. You should also look at CWA's campaign called Speed Matters at http://www.speedmatters.org. The site details specific long term and short term proposals to build a fast, affordable, open, internet for all Americans.

As a member of CWA I appreciate the efforts of CWA to educate its members and the general public about high speed Internet issues and America's low performance compared with other countries.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Snookybear (profile), 20 May 2010 @ 7:42pm

Rural areas are ignored
My rural area outside of Hohenwald, Tennessee has been ignored. AT&T/ Bellsouth along with Charter Communications refuse to service this rural area due to the fact that it is a lower elevation and it is nothing but hills surrounding this community. I have communicated with workers in the field for AT&T and they esxplained to me that their company expanded one to one and a half miles farther out of the towns that they serve along with upgrading the infrastructure of the larger metropolitan areas. They claim that they have rural broadband.
[ link to this | view in thread ]