Digg Rebellion Highlights How The Community Is In Control

Easy Prediction: Google Not Going To Buy Dow Jones

from the they-can-do-anything dept

Wed, May 2nd 2007 7:39pm — Joseph Weisenthal

The fate of Dow Jones is very much in flux at the moment, with many predicting that News Corp. will ultimately be successful in its pursuit, despite the Bancroft family's initial opposition. As we mentioned yesterday, the deal has significance beyond the two companies, and some are wondering whether another party will come in and save Dow Jones. Naturally, a lot of names are being thrown around, including GE, private equity firms, and other newspaper companies, like the Washington Post. Oddly, a few people have thrown out the idea that Google could show some interest in the company. This is, to put it succinctly, never going to happen. Anyone who thinks that Google would shell out billions of dollars for a newspaper company doesn't realize what business Google is in, or, at the least, doesn't understand its business model. At this point, it seems like the name Google is just thrown around because it's a huge company with a pile of cash, rather then there being any logical reason for it. So if you're closely following this story, this is one rumor that you can safely ignore

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

7 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Buzz, 2 May 2007 @ 7:49pm

Google FTW
Google helps FIND information... it doesn't CARRY it. :P
[ link to this | view in thread ]
nonuser, 2 May 2007 @ 7:58pm

how about yahoo?
Agree it makes little sense for Google. But Yahoo is more of a portal than a search engine, and as the second or third horse in the race it could use a game changing device.

IAC is also lurking out there.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Svante Jorgensen, 2 May 2007 @ 8:27pm

The search begins
If you can find a company that Google is _not_ rumored to buy, see that would be news!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Charles Griswold, 2 May 2007 @ 11:08pm

Re: The search begins
If you can find a company that Google is _not_ rumored to buy, see that would be news!
Asia Carrera Productions?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 2 May 2007 @ 11:41pm

Dumbass
Ever heard of Google cache?
It's the thing most of the companies get mad about when they say google is holding their information.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bill, 3 May 2007 @ 5:21am

Re: how about yahoo?
Just read on Briefing.com that the word is they're talking to Thomson Corporation, Reuters and Yahoo. The Bancroft family is shopping the company to see what the value is in the company.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bill, 5 May 2007 @ 2:17pm

stupid, pointless article
This is, to put it succinctly, never going to happen. Anyone who thinks that Google would shell out billions of dollars for a newspaper company doesn't realize what business Google is in, or, at the least, doesn't understand its business model. This article from Joe is somewhat emblematic of the problem I have with lots of Techdirt articles. The bombastic statements of "fact", the pointing out of some previously unnoticed "error" on the part of someone and the lack of information to back up the story. If Joe had included what Google's business plan is, what business Dow Jones is in and why these two would be incompatible we, the readers, could maybe have learned something from him. Instead it's kind of a taunt over a possible mistake but I'm not convinced there was a mistake because I haven't learned anything about the issues.
[ link to this | view in thread ]