Stock Spam Getting Too Crowded: Latest Trick Is Advertising Your Stock In Respected Financial Publications
from the competition-is-getting-tough dept
Stock spam has become
even more popular over the last year or so, as there's increasing evidence that it works for the spammers as an easy way to get money. However, with so much spam, it appears that some need to figure out other ways to pump up their stock -- and may be using ads in respected financial publications to do so.
Davis Freeberg writes
"Normally, if I received a piece of stock spam, I'd just delete the message and move on, but last week I got a piece of stock spam in my mailbox instead of my inbox. The company in the letter was named Ghuangzhou Global Telecom. They recently went public in a reverse merger. Through the use of complex financial engineering, the company's founder, has gone from an initial $100 investment to $7.6 million, based upon Friday's closing price. What makes this story so surreal is how Ghuangzhou is getting their publicity. Instead of sending out mass email spams, they are targeting financial people with mailers and have been advertising in Business Week, Forbes and Investor Business Daily. Kiplinger's appears to be the only major publication to reject the ads, and has already spoken out about the ads -- but the rest of the mainstream media seems to content to ignore the issue, as long as they are getting ad revenue from the promoters." Freeberg also
takes a closer look at the company. It does seem problematic that respected financial publications seem to be giving the tacit okay to a questionable stock. Also, not mentioned in the article, but it certainly sounds like these ads may violate SEC rules for promoting a stock.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I read
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
one way
That being said, if a stock is being spammed then it should at least be given as an alert to all traders(especially day traders) to warn that the stock could be worthless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Commercials
It was very weird seeing a commercial for shoe stocks. But it couldn't be a pump and dump because presumably the company paid for the commercials. Weird.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's funny is that these guy are not "respected"
If you want to see more examples of over hyped stocks and dubious claims of influence, don't stop at Ghuangzhou - just take a look down the S&P 500 and pick one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why doesn't the market forces balance this out?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stock Spam
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stock Spam
[ link to this | view in chronology ]