Thinking Digitally Isn't A Separate Job Function For A Campaign Either
from the everyone-should-be-thinking-digitally dept
A year ago, we noted the silliness of companies having a separate "Chief Digital Officer" by noting that thinking digitally isn't a job function -- it's something that everyone at a company needs to take into account. Having a digital strategy isn't something you compartmentalize. It's something that has to be understood across the board. It appears that political campaigns don't quite understand this yet. David Weinberger points to political consultant Zack Exley, who is complaining about campaigns asking him to help them hire an "internet person" for their campaigns. He points out that the internet shouldn't be a separate part of the campaign -- but that the entire campaign staff needs to understand and make use of the internet. So, for all the talk of how digitally aware campaigns are this election season, perhaps the real turning point will be when the internet doesn't have its own separate strategy, but is simply a part of the overall strategy.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
On the other hand they probably arn't thinking of it this way, instead they would think of the way you seem to be taking it: someone to manage the internet part of their campaign.
To sumarise I think that criticising them for hiring an "internet person" is wrong, what should be examined, analised - and perhaps criticised, is the reasoning behind their proposal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Misunderstanding of specialization
I do not know what kind of knowledge do the Techdirt bloggers have on Televised political campaigns, but I assure you that a professional is needed to handle those.
Remember that the Internet is still a microscopic platform in terms of political influence, and a dedicated Internet guy would probably be a good idea, while the other staff members handle the more influential platforms.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I concure with comments 1-3
The most widely used campaign method is the spoken word, usually in the form of speeches throughout the campaign period. It's common knowledge that not all politicians are great speech writers therefore they hire speech writers. The candidates aren't that well versed in writing speeches to they hire someone who specializes in it to assist them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Zack's Point Is Valid
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Zack's Point Is Valid
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think it is too early to expect these older strategists to think to the Internet as part of a cohesive strategy. Give it 10-15 years. But the ones that do see the big picture definitely have the advantage.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No, the "internet strategy" shouldn't be separate from the main strategy.
Yes, campaigners who don't get it should hire someone who can advise on carrying core messages into this medium.
You're 50% on, Techdirt.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]