Microsoft Fixes Vista To Stave Off Antitrust Complaint
from the after-all-these-years dept
Last week, word emerged that Google was pushing for antitrust action against Microsoft, based on its contention that Vista was designed in such a way so as to degrade the performance of Google's desktop search tool. Based on Microsoft's previous legal settlements, anything that limits the functionality of third-party software on Windows is pretty much considered a no-no. But it looks like the crisis has been nipped in the bud, as Microsoft has said it will alter Vista to remove these performance issues, thus ending any legal actions against the company. It's not entirely clear whether the original problem was intentional or not on Microsoft's part, but the fact that the company has fixed it so quickly, would suggest some culpability. And so, even as its grip on the market declines, it's fairly clear why Microsoft's brand continues to be tainted and viewed suspiciously.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
WOO-HOO
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What's next?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
somewhat related
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Or it could easily have been that someone said, "Ah ha! This is probably what's causing it." And fixed it. But then the above quote wouldn't be as easy to write...
I find it much easier to believe my scenario than that a group of executives sat in a room and said, "How can we mess up an application that nobody in their right mind would be installing anyway?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: somewhat related
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Companies rarely have meetings for such things. Generally they pass down a vague memo like "do not expend effort to assist product x's compatibility" or some such thing. The memo may not say much, but the intent is generally taken pretty clearly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Windows 64
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Google desktop
I know what you're saying- I don't use it on my personal computers- but @ work, it's pretty handy in apps like Quickbooks, for example.
Everything has it's place, and I use Vista @ work w/ Intuit products.
In short, bugs suck
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Google Desktop
I don't see how having the content of your desktop indexed is a bad idea. I do have the report to Google option turned off, but searching my desktop via Google is much better than M-soft's. Plus, I've got a crapload of code, various work/school documents, etc. that I know where they are, but not if that particular document contains the needed piece of information.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Windows 64
Given that Norton and McAfee are heavy, poorly written software as well it's little wonder AVG has a market share at all.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Windows 64
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What's next?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Google Desktop
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Google Desktop
I switch gear to Launchy and never looked back.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Windows 64
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Google Desktop
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Haha..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Haha..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Haha..
You can fix all sorts of problems easily by ripping out some code, and there is a lot of behind-the-scenes code in windows for them to rip out.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
USE YOUR HOSTS FILE!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Google = Evil...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Haha..
Even if M$ in this particular instance actually did not cause the issue intentionally AND got lucky by finding a fix so quickly, you can't ignore the reason why people are so quick to suspect culpability...
M$ is not above those kind of tricks, and has used pretty much every dirty trick in the(ir) book over and over again...
you don't get that reputation lightly, and there's nothing Apple/Linux fan boy-ish about being suspicious...after all, the best indicator for future behavior is past behavior...which means that in M$s case it will be quite some time before we don't instinctively become suspicious
[ link to this | view in thread ]