Intellectual Property Fights Move Into The Restaurant Business
from the ugh dept
When trying to explain the problems of today's intellectual property system, it's often useful to use pizza shops as an example. Competition is natural. No one, the idea goes, should feel that a competitor opening up a pizza shop down the street somehow "infringes" on another pizza shop. It's just basic competition -- the same type that has helped grow and benefit society for ages. However, in our over-lawyered age where suddenly everyone is looking for ways to apply the monopoly powers of intellectual property law to their own business, this may be changing. Just like there's a push underway to introduce new monopoly rights into the fashion industry in spite of (or, in fact, because of) a thriving competitive market, it appears that lawyers are now looking to do the same in the restaurant business. The NY Times writes about a restaurant owner who is suing the owner of a competing restaurant. It is true that the second owner used to work for the first, but saying he then cannot open a competing restaurant is ridiculous (and, is pretty clearly allowed by the law).There are some amazingly ridiculous statements in the article. For example, the owner of the first restaurant, Rebecca Charles, is most upset by the fact that the owner of the second, Ed McFarland, offers a Caesar salad that Charles insists McFarland copied from her recipe. Of course, even she admits that her mother got that recipe from another restaurant, but doesn't seem to note the irony of then claiming ownership of it herself. Also, Charles admits that she based the idea for her restaurant on another restaurant. Looking at the menu for Charles' restaurant shows that she sells New England Clam Chowder... clearly invented by others. Is she paying up for that intellectual property? Of course not. The law is pretty clear on this one that she has no case -- and that's for a good reason. Imagine if there could be only one pizza shop in all of New York. Or only one oyster bar. That's ridiculous and would harm just about everyone. However, in this age where monopoly rights are bizarrely considered a good thing, it's no surprise that we're seeing a push to go in that direction.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Should there be patents for foreign students?
http://www.asahi.com/komimi/TKY200706280139.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Business lacks 'intellect' anymore. Did they outsource that too?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Maybe a case after all
You can, of course, disagree about whether this is really about protecting consumers or preventing competition (I can guess Techdirt's stance on this), but I'm not sure this is much of a change or a sign of the times, given Two Pesos is 15 years old and used not infrequently by businesses.
My favorite part of the article:
What appears to be "long overdue" is the lawyers convincing the restaurants to sue eachother.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is not new
Thinking of opening up a sub shop? Well, I hope you don't try to open one too close to a chain, or you will find yourself with a microscope up your butt when your competitor gleefully touts all the (non-existant) zoning laws you are violating, etc.
While intellectual property may only be getting into the act, it's easy to see that this has been going on for a long, long time, and allowing people to abuse the system like this only allows people to come up with more unique ways to interpret existing laws...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ahem... This is quite normal everywhere....
It's common practice, and it has been for ages all around the the world. While I haven't read the contract between the two parties nor see any logic in suing people over salad recipes, a very similar kind of behavior is usually specifically stated in agreements in order to protect restaurant owners from certain kinds of competition.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Ahem... This is quite normal everywhere....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Dan Holland, who was president of Papa John's... purchased Pizza Magia less than two years ago when it had only three stores."
"Papa John's accused Pizza Magia of imitating Papa John's methods of business, including use of a commissary system, a pizza crust with a highly recognizable raised border, toppings placed under the cheese and free garlic sauce given to customers."
http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:sUpkomDjwiQJ:findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m319 0/is_4_36/ai_82334297+papa+johns+pizza+magia&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=4&gl=us
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Sour Grapes
The crux of her argument is marble counter tops and a Cesar Salad dressing? Yeah, the courts have nothing better to do that hear this one. /sarcasm
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Heard this before
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh great...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Maybe a case after all
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Oh great...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Oh great...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Trademarks
for "swordfish chop" and "salmon pastrami".
Not true. He abandoned his salmon pastrami trademark
applications and cancelled his swordfish chop
application.
The trademark database can be search here: uspto.gov
and interestingly, "pearl's oyster bar" as a
restaurant name is actually owned by someone in
Oklahoma!!
http://www.funfresh.com/pearls.htm
so perhaps it is Rebecca charles who is violating the
trademark rights of the Oklahoma Pearl's!!
best,
chris peterson
860-307-1380
Word Mark PEARL'S OYSTER BAR
Goods and Services IC 043. US 100 101. G & S:
restaurant services. FIRST USE: 19841001. FIRST USE IN
COMMERCE: 19841001
Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
Design Search Code
Serial Number 78302896
Filing Date September 19, 2003
Current Filing Basis 1A
Original Filing Basis 1A
Published for Opposition June 22, 2004
Registration Number 2884384
Registration Date September 14, 2004
Owner (REGISTRANT) Pearl's Oyster Bar, Inc.
CORPORATION OKLAHOMA 827 Northwest 63rd Street, Suite
102 Oklahoma City OKLAHOMA 73116
Attorney of Record Anthony L. Rahhal
Prior Registrations 2506685;2672937
Disclaimer NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO
USE "OYSTER BAR" APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN
Type of Mark SERVICE MARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator LIVE
Word Mark PASTRAMI SALMON
Goods and Services (ABANDONED) IC 029. US 046. G & S:
MEAT; FISH FOR FOOD PURPOSES, SHELLFISH, NAMELY SHRIMP
CLAMS AND LOBSTER; SEAFOOD; PROCESSED SEAFOOD. FIRST
USE: 19940101. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19940101
Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
Design Search Code
Serial Number 76335934
Filing Date November 9, 2001
Current Filing Basis 1A
Original Filing Basis 1A
Owner (APPLICANT) BURKE, DAVID INDIVIDUAL UNITED
STATES 100 EAST 63 ST NEW YORK NEW YORK 10021
Type of Mark TRADEMARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator DEAD
Abandonment Date August 5, 2002
======================
Word Mark PASTRAMI SALMON
Goods and Services (ABANDONED) IC 029. US 046. G & S:
fish. FIRST USE: 19860100. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE:
19860100
Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
Design Search Code
Serial Number 74503022
Filing Date March 21, 1994
Current Filing Basis 1A
Original Filing Basis 1A
Owner (APPLICANT) Burke, David L. INDIVIDUAL UNITED
STATES 28 Old Fulton Street, THG Brooklyn NEW YORK
10021
Attorney of Record Robert W. Beattie
Type of Mark TRADEMARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator DEAD
Abandonment Date October 4, 1995
==========================
Word Mark SWORDFISH CHOP
Goods and Services (CANCELLED) IC 029. US 046. G & S:
prepared fish for consumption on or off the premises.
FIRST USE: 19920100. FIRST USE IN COMMERCE: 19920100
Mark Drawing Code (1) TYPED DRAWING
Design Search Code
Serial Number 74321106
Filing Date October 8, 1992
Current Filing Basis 1A
Original Filing Basis 1B
Published for Opposition October 26, 1993
Registration Number 1870697
Registration Date December 27, 1994
Owner (REGISTRANT) Atlantic & Pacific Grill
Associates L.P. DBA Park Avenue Cafe composed of White
& Witkowski Inc., a New York corporation LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP NEW YORK c/o The New York Restaurant
Group, Inc. 1114 First Avenue New York NEW YORK 10021
Assignment Recorded ASSIGNMENT RECORDED
Attorney of Record Scott Greenberg
Disclaimer NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO
USE "SWORDFISH" APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN
Type of Mark TRADEMARK
Register PRINCIPAL
Live/Dead Indicator DEAD
Cancellation Date January 5, 2002
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Overcast
Business lacks 'intellect' anymore. Did they outsource that too?
Isn't it obvious?
No they didn't outsource 'business intelligence', someone who is no longer in business has patented the concept of 'business intelligence' and is not licensing the concept to any of the current companies. The patent holder is not licensing the patent, they are just sitting on it waiting to see some sign of intelligence in current businesses, so that they can sue the crap out of them. Why work when you can just sue those who do?
Got handbasket? check
Got Hell? check
Going to Hell in a handbasket.... priceless
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Translation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Then there are companies like Sony (not an American company) which is a perfect example of how a company can "game" the capitalist system, even though when you really look at their philosophy and the way the conduct business they aren't really a firm believer in capitalism (it's clear they have more of a "feudal" philosophy, except instead of the "landholders" of old, they're "IP" holders who "rightfully" own all the product you just "lease"/use with their permission), they just use it to their advantage until they have enough muscle to try to enforce their ideological standards.
It's not very hard to extrapolate these current trends to see that if they continue, America stands a very good chance to be a second rate country in about 50 years from now.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Restaurant intellectual property
Can you spell hypocrite? I knew you could.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Restaurant intellectual property
A good attorney, who has his clients' interests and not his fees at heart, is always worthy of his hire.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
restaurant owner
[ link to this | view in thread ]