Criminal Charges For Using A Slot Machine With Faulty Software?
from the could-happen dept
We've had a few stories over the years of casinos refusing to give out slot machine prizes claiming software glitches on the slot machines. But how about charging people with a crime for using a slot machine with faulty software? Slashdot points us to a story about prosecutors debating whether or not to charge a bunch of people with criminal charges for using a slot machine that incorrectly credited every $1 as if it were $10. Now, clearly, the maker of the slot machine and the casino itself need to take some of the blame here, but prosecutors are saying (correctly) that if people knew the slot machine was doing this and used it on purpose for that reason, that's fraud. Even if that may be correct from a legal standpoint, it still looks bad. Caesars and the slot machine company should have tested the machine, and either way, charging people for criminal behavior for simply using your faulty machines can't be good for publicity.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: casinos, slot machine, software
Companies: caesars
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Ahem
Is it ok to rob my house ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ahem
Is it OK for you to buy that product?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Ahem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Ahem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ahem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Ahem
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Ahem
Also, it's one thing to change the software so that one can commit fraud but if the system itself is already faulty and you take advantage of that fault, I don't see it as a crime.
Putting underpriced barcodes on store items is fraud. Buying items at mistakenly overly discounted prices is not.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
(ps: shut your door!)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You're Kidding
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
HEY! wake up
If they can't get their software right-well you know- and you have enough ZELOT prosecutors in the U.S. to actually charge you...
LOCK your F'n door dumb ass.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Illegal?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
software glitch?
2) The patrons are likely to think it's some sort of comp (I've never been to a casino, but my friend's mom practically lives there, and so I hear all sorts of stories about the freebies casinos give out, and I would assume any slot machine crediting me 10 times what I put in to be comping me).
3) Did I mention that the casino should be fined for having glitchy software?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And that is why...
There is blame on both sides here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If the machine jams, the casino dosen't return your money, why shouldn't it be the same other way round ?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
table games had a more attentive sense about them. pay the money. count the chips, show the cards/dice/ball, place the bets, stop the betting, play the game, payout.
i think most of this had to do with the human interaction between the better and the gambling venue.
whereas at the slots, it was more like, inster bill, hit max bet, hit max bet, hit max bet, out of cash, insert bill, max bet, max bet. the people didn't check if they were getting the correct credit for those Frankiln's they were pumping into the machine.
but i think the gaming comission and the casions are the ones with the majority of the burden here. the casions are in the business of not losing money, so they should be making sure that every credit/chip is accounted for.
the GC should be on the lookout for any software that has bugs, either for or agains thte consumer. they (the GC) should be checking for the most equal playing field (especially for the consumer)
ultimatly, i believe the consumer has the smalles responsibility out of the 3. they should be protected both ways, if they are in the advantage (i.e. more credits) or not (refusal of payments/shorting credits) due to the fact the GC/Casions are the ones who are trying to make everythigna ccountable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nonsense
I also can't figure out how they know who was playing the machines. When I was in Vegas, the few times I felt like playing a slot, I just fed it a $1 or $5 bill. I know they have cameras everywhere recording people but how do they know who the people are in order to track them down weeks later?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nonsense
And I still say that in order for them to know that the software of a machine is faulty they must know exactly how the software is suppose to work. And by knowing exactly how the software works I mean they exactly when the machine will and will not hit the jackpot. I do not like those odds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Nonsense
> Just watch the cameras and see what room
> they go to.
Assuming they're staying at hotel, yeah. But a significant percentage of people that gamble at any given casino are either locals who have their own homes in the area or people who are just as likely to be staying at some other hotel in town, not necessarily the one the casino is attached to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Nonsense
Ok, watch which car they get into (licence plate). Or watch them go to the next hotel, half of them are owned by the same people anyways. Even if they weren't, casinos would most likely work with each other in finding a person that scammed a casino out of money because it's a threat to their casino as well. On the off chance they take public transportation(or walk), get local authorities involved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Nonsense
catchmeifyoucan !
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Better analogy
You go to the store, and you buy a $1000 32 in plasma, and when you pull up to the loading dock they put a $2500 52 in plasma in you vehicle and you take off.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Better analogy
You buy said tv thinking, ".. what a bargain, thats a bargain for me". They the store tries to prosecute YOU suggesting YOU were the one who tampered with the price, or that you SHOULD HAVE at least known better.
Its total BS. The store, in this case the casino, should be monitoring such things. If they find a defective machine, fix it. If someone is playing it, make them leave, then fix it.
It should be clear that its only criminal if the person playing the machine is tampering with it, and they have a 100-zillion cameras watching you to know if you did that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Place your bet
If it was a snack machine, sure, that's wrong. The whole point of a slot machine is to risk money against profit. I'd call that winning.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The way I see it...
This should not have been such a big thing for the casino anyway, since the odds are certainly in the casino's best interest. So, you get ten plays for every dollar assuming it was a dollar per spin. Even so, the casino makes far more money than it was paying out. The $400,000 some-odd "damages" the casino claims to have lost due to the faulty machine equates to $40,000 they actually made on the machine when people put their coin in the slot.
Who's at fault? It's all on the casino for not paying close attention to their own equipment, not the patrons who took advantage of it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think it's more analogous to you go to an ATM. You withdraw $20 and it gives you $2000. Do you think you get to keep the $2000?!?!? Of course not. Bet your ass someone's going to come looking for you ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Strikes me as similar to using exploits
I suppose the fraud could come from claiming winnings they hadn't acutally earned.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pretty stupid in a high security environment, they will find you sooner or later.
I can see maybe somebody walking up and putting in $100 pulling the lever once and getting a jackpot and walking away a winner thinking they just missunderstood the payout.
Alot of those machines have crazy ways to win...
Alot of machines dont even use tokens anymore here they just print winning slip.
Anybody winning $40,000 from a casino in such a short time like less than 6 months is probably automatically investigated.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nevada gaming used to be very thorough
It's the manufacturer that pays the state for all the testing so they go great extremes to get it right the first time.
My guess (and it's completely a guess) is that the error would be in the bill/coin acceptor mechanism itself rather than in the game portion of the firmware. Those mechs are intelligent peripherals purchased from third parties. Sometimes the firmware in them has a bug or two. I've seen machines accidentally credit for $50 when a $20 bill was inserted but the problem was detected very quickly and a workaround put in place within hours.
I'm surprised that the machine made it past Nevada gaming without the error being detected. They do employ third parties to do the testing but my understanding was they were very detailed, very firm and very fair. Maybe things have changed since the 90's?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Think about the odds of finding a machine with a g
Example: (paycheck $550 x 10 = $5500)
All without pulling a handle and just hitting CASH OUT.
WOW now we have a problem.
Also we dont know if they (Casino's guest) repeated this proceess over and over.
Imagine now we have $5500 ok insert it again.
$5500 x 10 = $55,000 now that's a good day.
Now we looking into Grand theft. Bummer.
Think about the odds of finding a machine with a glitch like this one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Quit with the analogies, they don't make sense.
Think about it, if casinos really could they would let people win a lot more often. It would draw in more crowds and they would make more money. They can't do this though without getting fined. Gambling in Vegas is not as much luck as you think.
Now as far as the people being sued, I don't know their situation. I've played plenty of slot machines in my time and you can get into that robot-mode of playing, but even then it would be pretty hard to not notice you are getting way more credits than you bought (then again, I'm not an addict). It's called stealing no matter who it's from. Some people think stealing from big corporations just because they have a lot more money is okay, but I don't. Stealing makes you a thief no matter how hard you try to reason it. I believe the casino is entitled to damages suffered and there is no excuse why those people did not press the service call button (located on every machine) other than greed that is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
fuck them
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Most of you are missing the point
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
intent
You assume that those in charge of the situation/items did not make a mistake, as they do not have a reputation for it, and do not lead you to expect mistakes.
We go through life thinking that those that are responsible for it, are doing things a certain way because that is how they wanted it to be. We have no background, no basis, to expect them to be doing something that way by mistake. Without knowing the mind of the casino, there is no way to know they did not purposely rig that machine to do that.
When gas stations accidentally sell gas at cents on the dollar and people come back and fill up all their vehicles, they don't expect the customers to come pay the difference. They write it off to their dumb mistake for not checking. And they don't do it again. Why is a casino any different?
*~*~*~He who bitches loudest gets the money~*~*~*
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Acid Test
The acid test is that you can't have it both ways. If you can't be ripped off by a fault in the software by the casino, then it follows that the casino can't be ripped off by you as a result of the fault in the software.
Woadan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Acid Test
>> If you were putting in a dollar and you were getting credited 1/10 of the
>> value (a tenfold mark-up for the casino), you would certainly be demanding
>> that the casino fix the machine, or turn it off...
The problem is that the casino is getting it both ways, they do not refund your money when the equipment fails to credit you appropriately.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is it right
I'm sure in this day of buy outs the money crunch should factor in... Think about it... It's an easy way to make up a shortage... Truth be told if you loose does anyone investigate? So I say fair play... Casino should pay up...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]