Guy Suing Spammers Under CAN-SPAM Told To Pay Legal Fees Of The Company He Sued
from the ouch dept
When Congress first passed the CAN SPAM law, they were very clear that it wasn't to be used by the everyday citizen to sue spammers. Instead, it was only for ISPs or the government. Of course, a group of anti-spam fighters quickly came up with loopholes, whereby they basically pretended to be an ISP for the sake of suing spammers. Back in May, we noted that one of the guys using this trick lost his case, as the judge pointed out that he clearly wasn't an ISP and was simply abusing CAN SPAM. Thus, it shouldn't come as much of a surprise that the same guy has now been ordered to pay $110k for the legal fees of the company he sued. The judge also blasts the guy for bringing frivolous lawsuits, noting that he basically set up an entire business whose only purpose is to bring lawsuits against those he accuses of spam. This ruling is likely to put something of a damper on these types of lawsuits. Many people may point out that it's unfortunate that guys like this can't sue spammers any more, but if you want to blame someone, it should be Congress for the wording of the CAN SPAM law (which was more intended to clarify what type of spam was legal, than to outlaw spam).Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The purpose of government
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The purpose of government
Normally I would be agreeing with you, but not in this case. This was an individual who abused the law to try to prove a point. The justice system is simply doing their job (for once) and turning it back on him for exploiting the law. He tried a loop hole and it didn't work, now he has to pay the consequences.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Would like the rest of the story
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RE: RE: The purpose of government
[ link to this | view in thread ]
He's no hero
So he tried to work the system to make money for himself.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If i ever came across one...
Years of frustration as a web developer and forum/community administrator are my motive. If i could go postal on the spam community, i most certainly would. It is a shame that the laws in this country don't allow me that right.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Always kill the spammer
Same to the idiots abusing the court systems to make money.
Death to the companies that spend all their time filing obvious patents and suing the companies that produce products.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Good try but...
The real problem here is the law itself that specifically only looks out for ISPs and other businesses. I'm sure if any of the legislators that supported this law actually had the people in mind it would have been worded properly but since most citizens can't afford to buy a politician we get left out in the cold.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The purpose of government
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"anti-spam fighters"?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
so what
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: He's no hero
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: He's no hero
The company makes it's money doing shady business practices, so using shady practices to obtain their money makes him a hero? Two wrongs do not make a right. Also, it does not cost the average consumer enough money to give them the right to file a law suit, however, it does cost ISPs a lot of money. An ISP can sue on behalf of it's self or it's users, but the users can not sue because it would simply promote more stupidity in the courts.
Just because something is annoying does not mean an individual has a right to sue. Hell, otherwise I would sue every advertiser on TV.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: He's no hero by Casper
hahahaha....
touche friend!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
We need this guy
Can we get this judge to oversee patent suits from now on?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: He's no hero
hmmm....i dont care what his ulterior motive might be if the result might have been halting the "abuse of citizens" . wouldn't it be nice if it was profitable to do the right thing, or right a wrong?? but alas, no, there is no motivation, financial or otherwise, to do the right thing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The purpose of government
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Would like the rest of the story
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: He's no hero
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: He's no hero
Spammers burn in hell.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The purpose of government
[ link to this | view in thread ]
dumbass
But, if a guy's dumb enough to walk into a court room, lying as obviously as he was, then I'm glad the 'tard lost the case and had to pay royally for his stupidity.
Yeah, it's easy to blame congress for not making a better law; but, there's also been more than enough bitching about bad tech laws. They're in a catch-22. At least they found something that works to whatever extent it can rather than being argued for all of their misunderstandings of technology.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Says Eric in the article, who hopefully is aware that the Can Spam Act's primary purpose was in fact to PROTECT marketers....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Always kill the spammer
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Citation?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Did you read the order?
On the other hand, it sounds like the plaintif made his far share of mistakes as well. He might have very well have won his suit had he made a competent showing. To me, it sounds like the judge was sick of the crap both were spewing...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Comments Spam
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: He's no hero
The hell you say!! I've heard that all my life and have yet to accept it as fact or see it proven.
Let's take math; a positive times a positive= a positive
a negative times a negative= a positive
only a negative times a positive = a negative.
In summary; only a wrong times a right = a wrong, so 2 wrongs indeed do = a right
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: He's no hero
Simply put if it's good for the goose (big company) it's good for the gander (little guy).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: He's no hero
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not anti-spam
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: He's no hero
negative PLUS negative = negative
negative PLUS positive = + or - depends on which one is greater, which better reflects life
Fool.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Two suggested actions
The court did the correct thing in making this guy pay. However, I think the court still needs to take the case into consideration and bring judgement against known-spammers like this, no matter where the evidence came from. Maybe we all need to write to the Congress and suggest they edit the Act to clarify such loop hole from ever happening in the first place.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Would like the rest of the story
I am very involved with politics. One of the first things you learn is that you just accept that your allies in a given fight are there for their own reasons, reasons that you may find "impure". But demanding "purity" of motivation quickly results in no allies and no wins.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Who flipping cares... this ain't Hollywood
Let me ask you something... if you are in a fire and the scummy child molester living next to you is going to save you .... do you refuse his help (and die) because he's "no hero"? Or do you accept his help and don't question his motivation behind helping save your sorry life?
(I am sure you chose death -- so really the question is for others ;-) )
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I H8 spammers
Those bastards send you massive messages "complying" the CAN-SPAM "law" that legalizes the hated spammers and then when you unsubscribe you get more spam!!! And the spam@uce.gov is paid by spammers to catch your "complaints"! The GOV-MENT and the CON-GRESS all are paid by spammers to annoy us regulars and to control population...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Push Spammers off a cliff
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Comments Spam
[ link to this | view in thread ]