Inadvertent Online Resumes Continue To Cause Some Problems
from the broken-off dept
It's pretty common for people to do Google background checks on prospective employees (or potential dates) these days, so it's a little surprising to see people still put all sorts of information that could harm their job prospects online. A substitute judge in Las Vegas lost his position last week, after some people noticed that his MySpace profile listed his personal interests as, among other things, "Breaking my foot off in a prosecutor's ass ... and improving my ability to break my foot off in a prosecutor's ass." A local district attorney alleged that this displayed a bias against prosecutors, and asked that the judge be recused from his criminal cases, but court administrators went a step further and decided not to use his services any more. The judge, or now ex-judge, says that, basically, he was trying to be funny, and that the overstatement on his page was obvious. That may be the case, but given his position -- and his political ambitions -- it's hard to imagine that he couldn't foresee any problems from putting the comments up online.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: judges, social networking
Companies: myspace
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Sad, though...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sad, though...
There are plenty of things that are political incorrect that wouldn't necessarily have had the same effect on his career. Expressing a fondness for hunting, for instance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sad, though...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sad, though...
If you don't want to see yourself on the evening news, don't post stupid things online.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not really new
The only difference now is that the bar is much larger and the memory of the listeners is much longer.
This lesson has been taught numerous times already and all that's left is to pity those that refuse to learn it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Survival of the fittest
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
MySpace = Attention Whores
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
please
It was more likely a confirmation of his already established dislike for prosecutors. Probably "the straw that broke the camel's back".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An equivalent view
It sounds to me like he wanted to uphold the ethics of the position. And some good Christians put a spin on it and got the context seen from their side.
Sometimes the prosecution gets unfair. They have rules. And they are "his side" in that they work for the government too. He has to exercise control and impose imitations on all who come before him.
He could have also said - "Breaking my foot off in some lawyer's ass ... and improving my ability to break my foot off in in some lawyer's ass." - and it would have been just as true. Simply he was thinking about the prosecutors at that moment when he wrote the list of interests, maybe something happened that week. MySpace is personal, not a life-statement-canon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: An equivalent view
Judges are not perfect -- that is why there are appeals processes -- but we need to start with the field as level as possible. This guy showed a clear bias, and did so in a very public manner.
Just the fact that he chose to put those kind of thoughts on the Internet reveals a clear lack of judgement. We are well rid of him as a judge.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This poor guy!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This poor guy!
Regardless of what this judge said, do you really want a judge that is BIAS against [fill in the blank of something you believe in]?
Use your brain for a second or two.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Prosecutors
One even used the term Piling ON when enumerating charges.
Our system is broken and is again starting to lose faith with the people.
And all that happens is more laws get passed that you can run afoul of.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Please don't substitute...
The judge was unprofessional and in a way that drew into question whether he was capable of handling his job.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Inadvertant on-line resumes...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Rod Burch
Thanks
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I think this judge said 'prosecuters' in an effort to not say someone specifics name.
Go ahead and offend someone, start a debate, make people use their minds.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe a symptom...
http://economist.com/world/na/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9413718
I do think it was a bit foolish for a working professional to put something like that somewhere so public, but I'm still on the fence on the "inadvertent resume" issue.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you have an account, you have failed the test.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
People really need to consider having their real name on a blog or anything else that is public. I have a blog, its pretty boring, but I do like to write about some business issues, DRM, whatever. Why would I want my name connected with an opinion piece when in the future, I may want to work for a company that is against that position?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google searches overrated
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]