Wall Street Banks Back Off Plans To Finance Films

from the no-motion-pictures dept

In the past year or so, there's been a surge of interest on Wall Street in financing Hollywood films. As the cost of making motion pictures continues to spiral higher, it makes sense that studios would look beyond its traditional networks to raise money. That being said, we had some hope that investment banks and hedge funds could be a positive force in the industry, since they'd likely be reluctant to write a blank check for some of the big budget, big star boondoggles that have characterized the industry of late. Well, it looks like we'll have to wait awhile before we learn how this plays out. The credit crunch has prompted Goldman Sachs and Deutsche Bank to postopone plans to raise $1 billion to fund films at MGM. The banks could still do the deal if they see a lot of investor demand for it, but that seems pretty unlikely in light of current conditions. Meanwhile, the Hollywood studios might have to make do with a bit less cash.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: credit crunch, finance, hollywood, wall street
Companies: deutsche bank, goldman sachs, mgm


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Raymond L, 17 Aug 2007 @ 6:36am

    Plot

    Maybe they'll go back to making films with plots rather than special effects?

    Or is it just that people don't want plot any more?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Aug 2007 @ 6:38am

    plot? whats a plot? i though movies were just a bunch of guys running around a green screen (with a little boob now and then)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Palmyra, 17 Aug 2007 @ 6:59am

    The Hobbit has a plot.

    One of the films that could not get backing is Peter Jackson's The Hobbit. After the Lord of the Rings trilogy if Jackson can’t get backing I fear that the overall financial system is in deep trouble.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    literate, sometimes, 17 Aug 2007 @ 7:31am

    hey, joe, where you goin' with that O in your hand

    what's a "postopone"???

    is it related to a "cornpone"???

    maybe it's what my ex-boss suffers from...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous of Course, 17 Aug 2007 @ 7:38am

    More of the Same

    Hollywood on the whole seems to lack
    creativity not money.

    Hollywood isn't interested in making
    good movies, they're interested in
    making money. If a good movie is
    the result that's nice but it's not
    necessary.

    Hollywood has also become risk adverse.
    The movies they produce are insanely
    expensive. More of the same seems to
    work, so we get predictable flashy
    violence sequel six or a remake of
    To Kill A Mocking Bird.

    I think they could do both. Many
    smaller investments could yield as
    much return and would be more likely
    to produce good movies as well.

    I don't believe that money from bankers
    would help. I'd like to see more low
    budget movies and some experimentation.
    That would produce few flops to be sure
    and perhaps some real winners as well.

    And yes, good is subjective. I'd like
    more brain candy and less eye candy please.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Jezsik, 17 Aug 2007 @ 7:48am

    Sorry to read this news

    I would have gladly invested in a fund that financed movies if that fund took an active role in keeping the costs under control. Years ago I read an article that detailed the return on investment from various producers. It pointed out how profitable Clint Eastwood was (he produced a very profitable movie on the same size budget that Robert Redford had for the costumes in The Natural).

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Charles Griswold, 17 Aug 2007 @ 2:35pm

    Re:

    plot? whats a plot? i though movies were just a bunch of guys running around a green screen (with a little boob now and then)
    The plot is the part that is CGI'd in later. You know, the scenery, the explosions, the actors, the extras, the boobs...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Andy McLean, 17 Aug 2007 @ 2:57pm

    Just what Wall street needs, yet another area for the uninitiated to speculate and then loose their fannies.

    Then, when Hollywood becomes dependent on this foprm of financing and enough greedy suckers get burnt in the market, we can have a collapse, followed by (a brief) moment of sobriety in both the markets and Hollywood.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 17 Aug 2007 @ 6:13pm

    Re: #8 - Andy McLean said it

    Perfect comment Andy.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. icon
    chris (profile), 18 Aug 2007 @ 6:48am

    it's logical

    why not get wall street involved? hollywood has had show business and investment banking ass backwards for years.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    swansi, 30 Jan 2009 @ 11:40pm

    Business

    Hi,
    I am new in this site.i completed my graduation and i start a new business but i have some problems because i started new so i can not any experience so how to improve my business with less expenditure and which business is good for in this situation.Most of the people suffer for their job so do not
    disappointed start a new business first is we face many up and downs so every one be strong and start a new life.

    ==================================

    MLS listings

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.