RIAA Finally Pays Legal Fees On Mis-Filed Suit... But Manages To Screw That Up As Well
from the incompetent-or-just-arrogant? dept
Remember last month when the RIAA was simply ignoring a court order to pay up the legal fees for one of the people that they incorrectly sued for file sharing? Well, they've finally paid up... but even then they ignored both the interest they owed for being late and the instructions for how payment was to be delivered. At some point you have to wonder if they're just messing with people on purpose or if they're really this incompetent.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: lawsuits, legal fees, riaa
Companies: riaa
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
For the RIAA and a court ordered payment this does not sound like mallace but a normal muck up.
The only part that I disagree with is that the RIAA should be paying punative damages too. Something with lots of zero in it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I can see....
Better yet, disband the RIAA so people can fight directly with the companies in charge (Warner and Universal, you are among the long list of cowards).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The RIAA can dish it out...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would like a loan please...
The lawyers are playing the accounting game (not a muck up) and the payee has to unfortunately wait.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Economics classes do not teach you this. Real world operations do. I have worked for a few companies (no, I was not part of the accounting dept) that did take a long time to pay bills. Sometimes it was because the bill was overlooked, misrouted, put into a stack somewhere and forgotten, etc. Many times it was intentional to not pay immediately. In the cases of some companies it is literally because they could.
What is true in business is that a lot of companies now accept that this is going to happen. This is a large part of why you now have lots of companies now including penalty or interest terms if not paid within a certain timeframe.
I agree that in this case, especially since it's a legal case, that the RIAA is intentionally doing this. They want to make it as difficult as they possibly can. There is no real penalty that will be imposed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Definitely intentional
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Definitely intentional
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Refuse/Resist"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
paying at 60+ days...
While European businesses aren't immune to this, mid and larger size companies often sign payment and penalties agreeements before even discussing business and I have seen activities halted within days of a late payment. While this means loss of potential business, it also means far fewer delinquent accounts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
but to not follow the attorney's instructions on payment.
All big companies have procedures in how payments are to be handled. Most often especially historically this has and is by check.
The RIAA cut a check to the individual in a reasonable business time frame.
The real question is why the attorney is insistent that the RIAA deposit this check into the person account of the attorney? This smells. It smell as bad as the RIAA's shakedown. It smells just like a sleaze bag attempting to extract money from both the RIAA and the client.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]