Internet Holdouts Upset At Newspapers For Moving Content Online
from the catch-up-with-the-times dept
Romenesko points us to an article by the Baltimore Sun's public editor about people who don't use the internet. Apparently, they're growing increasingly upset at newspapers that are moving more content online and cutting back on what they include in the print edition. Many newspapers have realized that they can save a lot of money by not printing things like tv listings or stock listings in the actual paper, knowing that it's often much easier for most people to find that information online or through other sources. That's absolutely true, but apparently it's upsetting those who aren't caught up on the latest technology trends and have no interest in finding their way online to check the tv listings. While you can understand how they feel, it's really difficult to feel too much sympathy. Things definitely do change over time, but it's hard to justify newspapers spending so much on newsprint and ink when only a tiny percentage of people actually uses that section of the newspaper. Perhaps there are opportunities for more customized offerings, where those who really want printed copies can have alternative sources of getting them, rather than as part of the daily paper.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: internet holdouts, newspapers
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Well...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
PTTG
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Well...
Indeed, but that's a small and shrinking audience. Newspapers can do the cost benefit analysis on that and realize that it's better for them to ditch all those costs, even if it means those folks cut off their subscription.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: PTTG
look at the politicians, they're mostly retired people!!!
and really there's an ever growing interest in them
[ link to this | view in thread ]
So what?
I am still appalled at the amount of paper our supposedly virtual society consumes.Remeber when they said personal computers would eliminate paper and then they actually doubled it's usage?
Screw 'em, I say.
My cable internet connection is still cheaper than a monthly subscription to the Wall Street Journal.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: PTTG
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: PTTG
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Already noticed.
And your cable connection isn't cheaper then a subscription to the Wall Street Journal and if it is you're on dial-up and you need to be retired ol' man!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Already noticed.
And your cable connection isn't cheaper then a subscription to the Wall Street Journal and if it is you're on dial-up and you need to be retired ol' man!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
In your mail box, every week....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
what is that?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
extending the argument...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Well...
Indeed, but that's a small and shrinking audience. Newspapers can do the cost benefit analysis on that and realize that it's better for them to ditch all those costs, even if it means those folks cut off their subscription.
It's all about when that shrinking audience reaches critical mass and it that audience is too small to provide print newspapers to. Frankly given that net access still isn't as common place as people in urban areas like to believe I don't think that point has not been reached. It seems to me that while print newspapers are on the decline its still just a bit too soon (maybe just a few more years perhaps less) to totally write off the medium.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: PTTG
Re-read your comment when you're 75 and shitting in your diapers.
For the record: I'm 25.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Ice Man and the Newspaper
My grandfather knew his ice man. He knew his milk man, too. Yep, at first a horse drawn wagon, later by truck, deliveries of ice were once a very common site.
Over time, of course, people started buying themselves those fancy, electric refrigerators. Once they had them, they had no need for ice deliveries.
Now there were likely some who had no inclination of having refrigerators in their home, either because of cost or preference. But the ice man is now gone. And in most areas, so are the milk men.
Time moves forward, and so does technology and progress (if we're lucky).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike, small and shrinking? Yet you make it sound like broadband offerings are few and far between when you talk about competition in the telecom industry.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
the real issue
[ link to this | view in thread ]
analog
[ link to this | view in thread ]
i mean if it costs 100 bucks to print that extra stuff, but they are only bringing in 30 bucks in subscriptions, they will actually come out ahead in the profit end. makes a good economic choice.
but then there is something to be said about convience of a paper. i.e. you can read it anywhere. at any time with only a few basic needs... well the paper itself, and light to see it. with a computer you'd need some type of power source, plus an internet connection.. and a place to rest the computer, because it's hard trying to hold a laptop with one hand.
and as for the argument of fearing change....idk. how receptive will the younger generation be once they get older?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
missing real problem
I think the problem is that newspapers--and most media outlets--are now owned by people interested only in the bottom line. Content is irrelevant; the only concern is for advertising rates, which are driven by ratings and focus group results.
Also, why is it that we don't recycle newspaper? That's the only 1-for-1 material that I know of, e.g., you can get almost all of it back for use in another newspaper printing.
It's a reasonable expectation to have a newspaper in one's community--or at least it was. Corporate interests are obviating everyone else's interests, i.e., impossible not to notice because they're in the way.
The predictable future is that multinational and global corporations will explicitly run the world, instead of the stealthy approach they presently employ. I say, let's be up front about it--then we have a much better shot at holding them accountable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: PTTG
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: PTTG
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I wouldn't be surprised if more older people use newspapers as heir primary source of information. With that in mind, perhaps the newspapers have focused their efforts on the wrong pieces going online.
At any rate, just because technology is around doesn't mean it is the best or only solution. Maybe moving something else online would be better. And maybe not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Subscribers have every right to cancel their subscriptions when the information they want is no longer available.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
No, you seem to have misread my argument. Broadband *competition* is rare. But most people do have access to at least one provider. It's factual that more than half the country now has broadband and that a large % of the rest have some internet access.
The small and shrinking audience are those who only rely on newspapers for their stock info.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: extending the argument...
Indeed, but you seem to be missing the point of what I wrote. The number of folks who rely on newspapers for news and sports is still much higher than those who use it for stock and tv listings. That's an activity that has moved much more to the web.
Understanding the difference isn't that complicated.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Internet? Bah!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm also outraged!
IT IS FLAT I TELL YA!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: In your mail box, every week....
This brings up an interesting question: How much of the effect of seeing people go to the web is because print media is not printing, but, instead putting their wares on the web? Self fullfilling prophesy?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: PTTG
No, people are not REALLY interested in "retired" politicians; we're just coerced to be.
Hopefully, we will all find ourselves retired one day. Those retired folk that don't have a need for computers and the internet don't have a need because and old, out-dated, soon-to-be-defunct way of doing what they need still exists.
I was fine with analog t.v. I don't REALLY have a need for digital t.v. Does it mean that both should be supported till the end of time? No.
While we're at it, let's get rid of the printed TV Guide.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: PTTG
What if there were no retired people anymore at all and we just work until we die?
What if we never had to work ever again and we no longer had a need for money?
If "if" was a fifth...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
who cares
If you don't want to do the very basics (get a crappy computer & internet access... or go to the library) then you have no room to complain.
The world is changing with or without you.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm part of a team from LocateTV, a TV and film search site in prviate beta aiming to target this gap - less a TV Guide style listings page but allowing people to search for a programme or actor they like and it will then tell you where and when it is on, on TV, online or DVD, region-specific to the user.
Do you think this is the way forward or am I talking nonsense?!! Have your viewing habits changed with the increase in both content and the media where it is held?
If anyone wants an invite to the private beta send me a mail (lottie@locatetvblog.com) so you can see if you think this is a genius idea or... a less than genius idea!
[ link to this | view in thread ]