Universal Music Thinking Subscription... But In A Way That Will Never Succeed
from the ah,-back-to-this-again dept
Last week, there was a lot of buzz about the NY Times Magazine profile of Columbia Records boss Rick Rubin. Among the interesting tidbits was the idea that Rubin and many other executives in the industry have finally started to come around to the idea of a universal "subscription" service -- which many people had suggested years ago (and which the recording industry insisted would never work). Of course, the devil is always in the details -- and a big question is whether or not record labels will set this up like the existing "subscription" services like Napster and Rhapsody, or will actually recognize the value of going DRM free and making it more of a licensing program, rather than a limited subscription service. Nearly as big a question is whether or not all of the major players would ever agree to terms that would make such a system work.Surprisingly, it sounds like Universal Music is trying to take the lead in pushing out just such a subscription service, but the details are lacking. What details there are don't sound particularly promising. Basically, the program would require (yes, require) ISPs and mobile service providers to buy into the program, forcing all customers to opt-in. Effectively, this would be about ISPs and mobile service providers raising the prices on all customers, and offering them access to music in exchange. As you might imagine, that proposal has been something of a non-starter with most ISPs approached by Universal. It's also not clear if other labels would be involved, or if this would be a Universal-only sort of deal (which would also doom it to failure). In the meantime, given Universal Music's recent attempts to squeeze money from everyone they can, whether or not it makes sense, you can pretty much guarantee that the terms on any such proposal won't be too agreeable to anyone... other than Universal Music.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: music, subscriptions
Companies: universal music
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Oxymoron
No way.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
oh and i run a mac so playing with windows only drm is a no-no, make the files available in a drm format fine, as long as it works & plays.
oh and the range of music would have to be good as well, i'd have no issues with 'new' tracks not being on the service for a few weeks but after that if they start limiting whats there then it gets dropped.
i think that will be the killer.. the lack of ability to opt-in, and then the lack of a way to opt-out if its naff, well cept dropping the isp.. yeah i can see the isp's liking that
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: by Jon
I have a box of old vinyl LPs that I rarely play but when I do I TRULY enjoy them. I paid for some of them over 30 years ago - they are still mine.
Admittedly, most of today's music is not worth keeping but the principal remains - pay for it = keep it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Who gets the money?
Just as concerning to me is that even if there's a fair system in place? e.g. who gets my money. I would certainly not want to use my 'allowance' under such a scheme to buy from independant artists only to have my money go to Britney. How would the money be split between the artists fairly?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Who gets the money?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Funny how that works, eh?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
NO!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Subscription is good
My personal threshold is $50 a month if I could have access to any song anywhere and have it be playable on any device wirelessly (go to a friends house and play through their stereo without wires, for example). If I were the recording industry I'd be looking to buy a tech start-up that would make more devices wirelessly interoperable and require a subscription for that interoperability.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My Thoughts
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: My Thoughts
Good musical acts rarely sign with big labels until the end of their careers. I remember Issac Brock of Modest Mouse saying that they reason he went to a big label wasn't for money, he made substantially less per album sold, but that they were able to front him 200,000K for recording costs and he wanted to do some crazy layering. Something UP wasn't able to do.
In an semi-related note, UP is the only label I can think of not on Rhapsody.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lets hope ISPs don't go for this
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Joke ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This is just like...
I'm sorry but this is just another of the big labels death throes. They are reaching for any straw of hope in order to sustain their carnivorous business methods.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yep, I'm not going to pay to 'lease' music for a while, lol.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: by Jon
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]