AT&T: Bundling Is Lame... But You Have To Buy This Other Bundle To See Why
from the you-said-what-now? dept
It's been quite amusing recently to hear AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson's explanations for various AT&T policies lately. First there was that whole thing about how the company wasn't promoting its $10 DSL plan because "people didn't want it" and now we find out that the company that once claimed no one wanted naked DSL (perhaps because the company wouldn't offer it) is now admitting that actually people love naked DSL and hate bundles... except in order to get the "naked DSL" bundle they love so much, you have to bundle the service with a mobile phone. There's nothing wrong with offering bundles, certainly, but it seems reasonable to have a la carte offerings as well. In fact, Stephenson notes that forced bundling "is an old mind-set. We need to get over it." Yet, as Broadband Reports notes at the link above, it's a bit odd that he's saying forced bundling is an old mind-set, when he's promoting the similarly forced bundle -- where it's just mobile service rather than a landline phone service.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Bundles are what will put Vonage and other pure play companies out of business. Bundles are what is kicking AT&T & Verizons butt when offered by cable companies.
Of course, you wouldn't be too proud of your bundle when you are limited to slow DSL.
I would go with Cablevisions triple play, but I have to reset my modem about every day and even then, data goes down quite often. I won't trust them with my phone also. As soon as FiOS is available in my area I will sign up for voice/video/data. Of course, only if its still priced at under a hundred a month.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Second, Bundles are only good if you want everything in the bundle. If you want DSL and a cell phone then your set but if you have a cell phone already your stuck, or if you don't want one at all.
Or it could be like Comcast up here where you have a coice between naked cable internet for $60 some odd a month or internet and basic cable for $49.95 (for the first 12 months).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I didn’t receive the bill yet but I really curios to see much will be for DSL+Wireless Family Unity 1400 min(2 lines). I suspect: $13 for landline+$20 DSL+$90Wireless Family. You do the math.
Before I was paying $60 plus 2 cell phone lines of 60 to 70 each / month. And a Vonage line of $17 for 500 min.
I’ll advise to go with ATT but you have to have patience until you get the bill combine and everything up and running.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I work for a small TV station in the midwest. We've always been the home for the college sports team games - until this year when the Big Ten Network purchased the almost exclusive rights to show all Big Ten games.
So now I get daily phone calls from customers who ask if we'll still be showing their favorite college games and I get to to tell them that no, we won't, and in order to get them they'll have to a) subscribe to cable TV, b) upgrade to digital cable TV, c) pay extra for the 'digital sports package' that isn't included in basic *or* premium cable, and so if you were a typical over-the-air viewer and you still want your college games, you'll have to end up paying over $70 a month just to get the one channel you need to continue to watch games that were free up until this year.
That of course assumes that the local cable company will get off their butt and actually start offering the channel. They're currently involved in a pissing contest with Big Ten because Big Ten *wants* to be part of basic cable, but the cable company insists that people don't want Big Ten as part of their basic cable, that people *want* to pay extra and make it a premium channel.
This is exactly the sort of corporate thinking that leads to bundling that forces consumers to pay extra and purchase/subscribe to additional features they didn't want in the first place.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
bundle math
if you don't like the phone company's mobile service or TV service, are you going to break up the bundle and pay more for acceptable? no, you're going to be a good little consumer dog and pay good money for bad service.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Keep in mind that service for bundles typically are better, because providers don't want one offering to hurt the overall consumer view of their offering.
I have yet to see any true quad play bundle yet, some joint ventures sort of offer it (although not really) and with AT&T its Direct TV and DSL (still weak).
Verizon as far as I can tell has not linked in wireless to its FiOS offering.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Posts 3 & 6
Not their ass-tastic resold POTS service with their 96 hr mean time to repair, or their semi owned circuit based services that still take 48 hrs to repair despite the service level agreements and price premium. Not their shitty DSL, or their customer 'could-care-less' wireless service.
Bottom line, I much rather deal with the cable company that isnt locking me into any type of contract, provides all the services themselves instead of resells other companies products, and actually *owns* the network infrastructure they are broadcasting over.
The choice is to use the less evil of the presented options until something more favorable comes along, and cable bundling without contracts and commitments fits that bill perfectly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
and if some aspect of FiOS blows worse are you going to break up that bundle and pay more for a service that blows less? are you go crawling back to cablevision? are you even permitted to do that in the service agreement?
bundling is like putting all your eggs in one basket. in the TV and telecom markets, there is next to no choice as it is since there is almost no competition.
reduction in choice means that once you choose a bundle of services from one vendor, you then have only one vendor that you get your services from.
if you have three vendors for TV, phone, and internet service, dispute or dissatisfaction with one of those services doesn't have to interfere with your other services.
also, forced bundles force limits in choice. if the only broadband vendors in your neighborhood are the cable and phone comapnies, and you don't want a landline phone then you have only one choice of broadband: cable. if you get mad at the cable company (see the big 10 channel fiasco), you either have to live with it, or pony up for a landline phone. that's not choice.
plus, using scare tactics to get people to buy bundled services causes informed consumers to drop services they currently use but may not see much return from like when AT&T jacked up rates in northern california:
http://www.toyz.org/mrblog/archives/00000261.html
bundles aren't about saving the consumer money, they are about jacking up rates to coerce consumers into buying more services from one company, and the same or higher rates than they are currently paying.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That being said, you are either going to be paying your cable company or a teleco money, either directly or through a reseller. Even with total net neutrality you still have to rely on the pipe owner's infrastructure. What happens to Vonage service if your cable connection goes down? What happens to Skype service if your internet goes down?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Verizon's FiOS
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Really? When the telco forces you to get voice service to get DSL, that's a forced bundle. When the cable company forces you to get video service to get cable internet, that's a forced bundle.
So now you know.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
VoIP
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: VoIP by Anonymous Coward
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Call Gateway (or any pc retailer) and try to order a pc with absolutely no software (not even and OS). Having to buy a pc with an OS on it (especially since having no OS on it would mean a lower price) is a forced bundle.
For a while Toys R Us would only sale a Nintendo Wii as part of a bundle in which you had to buy a Wii, an extra controller, and a game for a set price. At least in this example you could just go to another dealer that offered the Wii without the forced bundle.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
AT&T Does NOT disallow VoIP
They both work great.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ATT
Just another way Corporate America is trying to "F" us all, for stuff we dont need. Just like the insurance companies.
By the way...I thought corporate monopolies in this country were illegal!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
go buy a cable modem (lets say one at bestbuy or circuit city...) ranging between 200-300 for a decent one..
buy a router
buy ethernet cable and coaxal cable ...
well after you do allll of that... your internet will be free... but of course they forget to mention that to you also dont they??
They also forget to tell you that you can get more than one line without having to pay for it.. even tho they say in the service agreement that they rather have a service technician (150-200) come out and put it in.. then possibly charge you per connection on that...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
9 lines.. yeah that is right.. and over 900 feet of ethernet Cat6e cable..
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bundle Electronic svces.
I have dial up Dell/AOL...which I do not find offsetting.
ATT phone bill
MCI phone bill
Time Warner Cable bill
All of which I sense to be duplication and tax heavy.
I think I want to upgrade to hi speed and get rid of one
phone bill and fit in cable to package/not
Can someone give me straight scoop please???
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: How?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bundling
[ link to this | view in thread ]