You Don't Create A Silicon Valley By Government Fiat
from the takes-a-bit-more-than-that dept
Two separate articles came out in two separate newspapers based 3,000 miles away from each other this past weekend -- but together they demonstrate exactly why so many places have had difficulty creating their own, local versions of "Silicon Valley." Especially during the dot com bubble, it seemed like every country and every state wanted to create some area that was a "local" Silicon Valley. There were silicon islands and silicon prairies and silicon alleys and silicon mountains... and almost all of them went nowhere. An article in the San Francisco Chronicle talks about how the original Silicon Valley was created, through a mixture of strong educational institutions, easy flow of capital and a culture that focused on risk, experimentation, entrepreneurship -- and the free flow of ideas. While the government played a big role in early Silicon Valley culture, it was as a customer, not as the creator of the culture. Contrast that to the story in the Washington Post about how Prince William County set out to create a high tech hub, which is still struggling to get much traction in the high tech world. Rather than paving the way for those critical components to form, the county simply set aside some land and (it appears) some marketing efforts to promote the county as a good place for high tech companies. That seems to be about all that many other "silicon somethings" did in the past decade as well -- forgetting that there's a lot more involved in creating a true high tech hub.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: culture, entrepreneurship, silicon valley
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Silicon Valley wnnabees before and during bubble 1
-- Keith Dawson, former proprietor of TBTF
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Does Silicon Valley Exist?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Government fiat, no; government hiring, maybe
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
p.s.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Missing the point...
The problem for them is that Silicon Valley is not at all like that. For every Yahoo, Intel or Google there are hundreds of companies that employ fewer than 100 people that makes something or supplies a service that are key to high tech. It becomes a huge interconnected web of suppliers and consumers that goods and people float around to.
I don't believe that dorpus lives in the valley. If he does, he definitely took his cynic pills this morning.
True Microsoft, IBM, AT&T and other hight tech companies are headquartered elsewhere but, those three all have a presence in the Valley. Apple, Yahoo, Google, Intel, AMD, Sun, eBay, BEA, Oracle, Sybase, Adobe, Cisco, nVidia, Webex, Verisign, Network Solutions, HP, Applied Matierial, National Semiconductor, Netflix, Varian, Intuit, Electronic Arts, Solectron, E*Trade, Network Appliance, Juniter Networks, Netgear, Maxtor, Western Digital, Segate, Altera, to name a few, are. These are hardly scammy startups.
Not all companies become industry giants but that doesn't mean that they are unsuccessful. There are hundreds of Valley companies that are successful by any measure. They provide stable employment and return a profit to their owners and investors.
It would also be unwise to assume that the only tech workers in the Valley are either in IT or "computer specialists." The Valley makes the hardware and software tools that make the specialties possible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Missing the point...
I lived there for 5 years before. I moved on to health-related industries, which offer equal or greater pay, and treats its workers a hell of a lot better.
>There are hundreds of Valley companies that are successful by any measure. They provide stable employment and return a profit to their owners and investors.
Stable employment, in IT? Heh. At the first sign of trouble, Valley companies lay off most of their workforce, hire new CEO's who don't know anything and mess up the company some more. The Valley companies that survive are those that have operations outside of the Valley to provide them steady revenue. The Valley specializes in the volatile, failure-prone new technologies; if they succeed, the jobs involving them are quickly exported somewhere else.
>It would also be unwise to assume that the only tech workers in the Valley are either in IT or "computer specialists." The Valley makes the hardware and software tools that make the specialties possible.
Sorry, but your sentences are contradictory. Hardware and software tools are, by definition, IT or computer specialties.
If you want to talk about non-computer hardware, such as medical devices, then the Valley is not a significant player in that industry. Medical device makers are concentrated in the Midwest, where there is a combination of huge medical centers, an ample supply of mechanical engineering graduates, and a network of specialty plastic and metal makers.
As the world's population ages, health care is destined to become the predominant economic activity. The Valley is poorly equipped to meet this challenge, owing to its small medical centers, lack of expertise. Techies in the Valley are for the most part very ignorant of the health sciences, obsessed with their "herbal medicine cures". California has put all its eggs in the two baskets of stem cell research and biotech, which insiders know have not been too successful.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Govt does nearly nothing well - -
Free enterprise works. But only till the govt can put it entirely out of business with ineptitude.
Hey, maybe they would run my medical plan for me?????
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It depends where ...
I think there's a balance, but not sure where that is, with government help and innovation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's Where the Money Is...
Sand Hill Road alone houses probably close to 60 Venture Capital funds, whose combined total for investing is in the billions.
It's true that a lot of those VC funds came in during the dot com rush, but those that have stayed and made it make the Valley THE place to come for money for tech startups - and tech start ups elsewhere in the country usually have to come to SV to do their song and dance.
Hence, startups that don't have much cash (most of them) are much better off and more strategically placed for access to capital if they startup in SV.
We make the trip up there from LA about every 3-5 weeks for meetings, etc - and the entrepreneurial "support groups" etc that exist in SV are far and away stronger than in anywhere else in the US simply by the sheer number of people "trying new things" with new companies... and they all need other folks to have drinks with, etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]