Forget Carrying Around 40,000 Songs; Think Infinite Music Storage
from the it's-in-the-cloud dept
Last month we wrote about how the economics of music were changing so rapidly that it highlighted how out of touch the record labels are when they still think charging $1 per song makes sense, just as Apple is releasing an iPod that can hold 40,000 songs. Of course, that's only looking at the present. We all know technology is rapidly changing, and Princeton computer science professor Ed Felten notes that it won't be long until anybody can carry all music ever recorded in their pocket. In fact, everyone will be able to do that. At that point, the economics of the industry are totally out of whack with what the recording industry still believes. Felten notes that if anyone can buy a bit of storage that contains all music ever recorded, just think how impossible it will be to shut down file trading operations. All of the music will be out there available to everyone. As long as one of your friends has access to all that music, you just need to create a private sharing network with them -- and the RIAA's goons will never know about it. Felten suggests this leads to a world where the industry is finally going to need to accept some kind of universal licensing plan -- or they might just realize that letting the music go free has plenty of benefits elsewhere in the music business model ecosystem. Of course, that would take more forward thinking record industry execs... and we may be waiting a long, long time for that to happen.![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: business models, economics, ed felten, music
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Monthly Fee
I would weed out the excess in the system, and leave the consumers with what we want. Next up, every movie ever filmed...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is only a matter of time until storage and bandwidth makes sharing all music ever the norm. Personally, I don't like 80% of the music ever created anyway and I'd hate to use my ipod to scrollwheel through all music ever to find that one song.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
NooOOooo!!!!! At least for now. Let all the dinosaur record companies die in the tar pit, then maybe institute some kind of universal licensing plan that gives the money directly to the artists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Storage
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Storage
I might need to get a second millionth job...
But, honestly, nobody would ever have that much music. Since the average life expectancy in the US, if I remember correctly, is only 75, or about 9,861,539.38 songs, there really isn't need.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The obvious solution - what was done for videotape
And what about the rights that lens makers have to the pictures you take - huh? Surely they own part of those!
But should we tithe to the church for the photons and sound waves we use with no payment whatsoever? Aren't we ripping the creator(s) off?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
What you're talking about is business, not music.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
napster 1999
Idea : im sure you all know the way dc++ works with ynhub. maybe is someone could create a server on the napster RFC, that could be linkable to hubs and nodes that we could create the worlds lagest MP3 network?? hows that for the riaa to find and trace :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
9 Inch Nails
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Totally agree
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or perhaps video is where we'll go
http://www.radio-edit.co.uk/?p=48
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Poor RIAA!
The RIAA, and anyone else stuck in the past, needs to figure out new ways to make a living. Musicians really don't need them anymore.
M.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
digital content will be free
The big media companies know this but they will not lead the way. They are responders to change not agents of change.
R
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
music
[ link to this | view in chronology ]