Wal-Mart Broadband Looks A Lot Less Impressive Than First Envisioned

from the not-quite-what-you-expected dept

Three years ago, we discussed the possibility that Wal-Mart could eventually enter the broadband business. At the time, the discussion was around Wal-Mart using its massive network of stores to act as WiMax access points, coating much of the nation with wireless internet access. The idea didn't seem likely for a variety of reasons, and with the news that Wal-Mart actually is entering the broadband space, we can easily see why the WiMax plan never made sense for Wal-Mart. Rather than taking the route suggested three years ago, Wal-Mart is simply partnering with Hughes to resell satellite broadband access. As many people know, satellite broadband access is the last refuge for the broadband addict who simply has no other choice. The speeds aren't great, the latency is a huge pain, and the reliability is often a problem. So, there are already some hurdles to overcome. Second, unlike the original suggestion, Wal-Mart appears to have nothing to do with the offering, other than slapping its brand on it (and even then it's not entirely clear from the article how the service will be branded). That means that Wal-Mart won't be able to have much say in how the service is run. Even if the stories of Wal-Mart losing its technology edge are overrated, this deal is going to involve existing infrastructure and existing service models -- meaning that it won't shake up the industry very much at all. Basically, what was envisioned three years back was Wal-Mart routing around other providers and offering up something entirely new, which it could control. Three years later, the best the company can do is piggyback its brand on a weak legacy offering. That's hardly going to shake up the industry.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: broadband, satellite
Companies: wal-mart


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    GeneralEmergency (profile), 9 Oct 2007 @ 4:41pm

    Maybe not such a bad thing...

    ...afterall.

    If they did go the WiMax route and started putting local cable companies and DSL providers out of business, there would be no end of the "Evil Ol-WalMart" HitJob-umentaries on tv taking precious airtime away from "Gems With Mandy".

    Sorry, too much "Extra Sarcasm Blend" coffee today.

    Alan

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2007 @ 4:47pm

    ... and we care about this because...? They can offer their service for .97$ instead of .99$? GO WALMART!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2007 @ 5:30pm

    why am I not surprized

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 9 Oct 2007 @ 7:03pm

    Wal-Mart Broadband Looks A Lot Less Impressive Than First Envisioned...

    That's technically impossible.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Streaker, 9 Oct 2007 @ 7:41pm

    This signals a weakness in Walmart's management. That something like this would even be considered, and then implemented, shows that Walmart may have reached its peak and has begun a long spiral downward. Remember K-mart's dominance just a couple of decades ago.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    Joe Smith, 9 Oct 2007 @ 8:24pm

    WALMARTS TAKING OVER THE WORLD!!!!!

    I KNEW IT!! WALMARTS PLANNING ON TAKING OVER THE WORLD! FIRST THE SIEZ CONTROL OF THE RETAIL INDUSTRY SQUASHING OUT all COMPETITORS NOW THEIR HEADED TO TAKE OVER THE INTERNET. THIS IS AN OUT RAGE AND THEY MUST BE STOPPED. EVERYBODY NEEDS TO STOP SHOPPING AT WALMART ELSE WITHIN THE NEXT DECADE WE'LL BE WEARING SMILEY FACES EVERY WHERE WE GO. ACT NOW BEFORE ITS TOO LATE!!!!!!!!!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    LJSeinfeld, 9 Oct 2007 @ 8:25pm

    Well... satellite "broadband" does suck -- but just think of all the cash Wal-Mart will make on selling the mobile home roof mounts.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    ME, 9 Oct 2007 @ 8:37pm

    Maybe peasants in the country could actually GET high speed internet for a decent price seeing as WalMart is everywhere. The signal should cover rural areas. Dial up really sucks. -_-

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    jb, 9 Oct 2007 @ 9:35pm

    it might be better than you think

    LEO satellites would reduce latency to something manageable. OFDM would allow an SFN/hybrid-terrestrial network for better urban coverage. mobile use may be supported. a new satellite-based TV service may be included.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Marathonfl, 9 Oct 2007 @ 9:56pm

    Satellite latency too high for gaming

    Gamers won't like the latency. With almost 96k miles for the data to travel round trip any gamer could experience too high of a delay to play effictively. On-line chess however will work just fine. VPN's often act up on satellite too. The only market they have is where people can't get other broadband options or don't need low latency communications.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    4-80-sicks, 10 Oct 2007 @ 9:50am

    Wal*Mart's reputation already frequently teeters dangerously. If I was them I certainly would not want to offer a universally reviled system. The fact that they're just rebranding it from another provider...well let's say it makes me think of walking into a pit bull fighting ring wearing a suit made of sausages.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.