FCC Releases Its Bogus Broadband Data Once Again
from the must-be-that-time-of-year dept
By this point, everyone knows that the FCC's data on broadband penetration in the US is totally bogus. Early in 2006, a GAO report slammed the FCC for using such bogus data. It uses a very low hurdle for what counts as "broadband" and then measures broadband based on zipcodes only. So if one broadband provider provides 200kbps service to a single house in that zipcode, the FCC considers broadband to be available to everyone in that zipcode. That, of course, is ridiculous -- as even right here in the heart of Silicon Valley it's difficult for some people to get broadband. When the FCC did little to respond, the GAO came out with a second report slamming the FCC again. When the FCC still did nothing, Congress got into the act, pushing forward a bill that would require the FCC to more accurately count broadband penetration. How did the FCC respond? By writing an editorial insisting that there's competition... even if it doesn't have any numbers to back it up.With all that as background, it should come as no surprise whatsoever that the latest FCC report on broadband penetration appears to use the same bogus methodology. It makes you wonder who they think they're fooling. With such a pointless methodology the results are pretty meaningless. After all, it suggests that 80% of zipcodes have at least four broadband service providers. Those who want to say that there's strong competition in broadband will falsely assume this means 80% of households have four providers to choose from, but it would probably be pretty difficult to find very many people who have four different providers available. There is one amusing point in the report. The FCC used to insist that after handing over monopolies to incumbents, new broadband options would come from other technologies, with broadband over powerlines being the "great hope" for broadband competition despite years and years of failed trials. It seems the FCC isn't talking much about broadband over powerlines any more... perhaps because its own report shows fewer subscribers than at the beginning of the year. So much for that plan.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bogus data, broadband, broadband penetration, fcc
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
if we keep saying it, maybe it will become true
http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2007/09/24
"if you could start believing that right now, it would be great."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
First the Patent Office, now the FCC
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: First the Patent Office, now the FCC
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: if we keep saying it, maybe it will become tru
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What do you expect....
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Dink9
I read a quote somewhere regarding religion and people that summed it up nicely:
Good people will usually behave good, and bad people will usually behave bad, but for a good person to behave bad, that takes religion.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Dink9
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: First the Patent Office, now the FCC
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It should have also responded by firing those in charge of the FCC and replacing them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]