Prince Threatens Fan Sites; Apparently He Didn't Get The Web As Much As We Thought

from the well-that's-disappointing dept

Over the last few years, there had been all sorts of indications that pop star Prince had actually figured out the economics that drive music. He'd run many different experiments on new business models, many of which involved embracing the basic economics we've discussed around here. He focused on performances and came up with ways to fund his creativity through new means. He recognized that his older catalog was promotional for all sorts of other things, and focused on constantly creating new music. Even the NY Times this summer had a detailed explanation for how Prince was embracing the economics of music to go beyond what others were doing. And then it all came crashing down. Prince sued sites like YouTube, eBay and the Pirate Bay for copyright infringement, focusing on the service provider rather than those who were actually infringing on the copyrights. While we hoped it was just a simple misunderstanding, it appears not. Prince has taken this campaign well beyond that, and is now threatening a bunch of fan sites for copyright infringement because they have photos of him and his album covers on their site. This is the type of thing we had thought went out of style in the late 90s when bands realized that fan sites are clearly only about helping you get more fans. It's quite disappointing that someone who seemed so close to figuring it all out has gone 180 degrees and passed the mantle of understanding music economics on to folks like Trent Reznor and Radiohead.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, fan sites, music, prince


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    W.B. McNamara (profile), 7 Nov 2007 @ 12:34pm

    Prince: music industry visionary or control freak

    I just saw the same news, but came away with a different take on it. Basically, this doesn't surprise me: all of Prince's moves have seemed to me like efforts to ensure that Prince is in absolute, total control of his creative output. While he's certainly more unhappy about the degree of control that a Warner Brothers executive may have over his work, it doesn't seem a stretch that he's displeased with even the amount of control that Joe Fanboy might have.

    As I noted in my post, the day that Jonathan Coulton starts filing suit against his fans I think we've got a lapsed "new music business" poster child, but Prince doesn't qualify for me.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Nov 2007 @ 12:43pm

    bam

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Nov 2007 @ 1:01pm

    Music economics

    music economics More like music economics for the washed up musicians.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    4-80-sicks, 7 Nov 2007 @ 1:15pm

    More like music economics for the washed up musicians.
    I don't think $1000+ per seat or 20 straight sold out shows is "washed up"

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    freakengine, 7 Nov 2007 @ 1:32pm

    Who says Prince is or was in control of the actions of his company anyway? Maybe he is and maybe he isn't. When an artist reaches the levels of a Prince, "he" basically becomes a company and gets all the problems associated with that status, such as overzealous copyright attorneys. Ever hear the story about George Lucas and Mad Magazine? Apparently Lucas called the publisher to tell them how much he enjoyed the Star Wars parodies on the same day his own lawyers sent Mad a cease and desist letter claiming Lucasfilm was due damages.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 7 Nov 2007 @ 5:49pm

      Re:

      Who says Prince is or was in control of the actions of his company anyway?
      Are you saying that he isn't? What's your source? If he isn't then I wouldn't call it "his company".

      Ever hear the story about George Lucas and Mad Magazine?
      That "story" sounds bogus to me. Where did you get it? I don't know of any lawyers that would take such an action on their client's behalf without consent and authorization.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Eeqmcsq, 7 Nov 2007 @ 7:12pm

        Re: Re:

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          Anonymous Coward, 7 Nov 2007 @ 9:16pm

          Re: Re: Re:

          Here's one place that mentions it.
          http://www.starwars.com/eu/lit/ref/f20071024/indexp2.html
          Notice how they don't aren't claiming that the lawyers were doing anything that Lucas didn't authorize. That story story makes it look like Lucas is really two faced, sending them a nice letter at the same time that he was turning his lawyers loose on them. What a bastard!

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            Anonymous Coward, 7 Nov 2007 @ 11:39pm

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            damn, remove the superfluous "don't" and "story" from that comment.

            link to this | view in chronology ]

          • identicon
            John Duncan Yoyo, 8 Nov 2007 @ 7:14am

            Re: Re: Re: Re:

            Another source on this is Mad Magazines Dick Debartolo. He told the story on one of the TWIT Daily Giz Wiz podcasts. I can't remember which one but basically Bill Gaines sent the lawyers letter back with eiher a copy of Lucas's letter or he just sent the lawyers letter on to Lucas and it was never heard from again.

            A lot of these places leave the lawyers on auto pilot and barely monitor them until they manage to embarass the client by doing one too many boneheaded things. Parody is protected speech and the lawyers should know that.

            link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 8 Nov 2007 @ 3:55pm

              Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

              A lot of these places leave the lawyers on auto pilot and barely monitor them until they manage to embarass the client by doing one too many boneheaded things.
              But still, the lawyers aren't doing anything the clients didn't tell them to do. If there are boneheads involved it isn't the lawyers but the clients for giving them such instructions in the first place. Of course when it produces some kind of embarrassment those same clients are quick to try to publicly blame it all on their lawyers who have to just shut up and take it. It's a game people who can easily afford lawyers like to play sometimes.

              Parody is protected speech and the lawyers should know that.
              Of course they should and they do. But sometimes clients with money to burn just insist on taking action anyway.

              link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Quad Core, 5 Jul 2008 @ 3:25pm

        Re: Re:

        "That "story" sounds bogus to me. Where did you get it? I don't know of any lawyers that would take such an action on their client's behalf without consent and authorization."

        A couple years back, Rush Limbaugh got a call from representatives of Chrissie Hynde (singer for The Pretenders), saying that he could no longer use her song as bumper music during his program. The representative said that Chrissie Hynde would not take any amount of money to change her mind, etc.

        Limbaugh stopped using the song until Chrissie Hynde called the New York affiliate and said on the air that she did NOT authorize that and that she and her parents were fans of the show. Soon after, the bumper was back.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Name, 7 Nov 2007 @ 1:45pm

    Let's go eat some pancakes

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Kevin, 7 Nov 2007 @ 1:46pm

    Prince doesn't get it, he's just weird...

    ...it just happened that his flavor of weird coincided with the "new economics of the music industry theory" for a few weeks. Seriously, read up on him. Listen to what Kevin Smith had to say about Prince and working with him. The guy is waaaaay out in left field.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      TheDock22, 7 Nov 2007 @ 2:05pm

      Re: Prince doesn't get it, he's just weird...

      I agree. From what I have read about Prince he is a complete control freak and just does not seem to know what is going in the world around him. From Prince, to Artist Formally Known as Prince, and the back to Prince you must know he is insane.

      And what was up with him whispering to Beyonce during those awards a few years ago? He is insane, pure a simple, and not a good role model to look at for changing his business model.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • Do Fan Sites Make Money?

    I don't know about fan sites but if they are only promoting the celebrity and using pictures and other items I can't imagine a celebrity being upset over that.

    But if that site is making a hefty profit by using the celebrities copyrighted or trademarked items that might be a different issue.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Anonymous Coward, 7 Nov 2007 @ 5:53pm

      Re: Do Fan Sites Make Money?

      I don't know about fan sites but if they are only promoting the celebrity and using pictures and other items I can't imagine a celebrity being upset over that.

      It doesn't take much imagination. There have been many reports in the media of celebrities acting like that. Do a little research.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    John, 7 Nov 2007 @ 4:59pm

    Prince

    Of coarse Prince has a love-hate relationship with the internet. He is a flake ...Prince does "the cocaine".

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Nov 2007 @ 5:42pm

    Idiot

    Prince...is...an...idiot.

    He may be musically gifted and he may have had a lot of good fortune in his life, but he is still an idiot.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    nipseyrussell, 8 Nov 2007 @ 9:27am

    "But if that site is making a hefty profit by using the celebrities copyrighted or trademarked items that might be a different issue."

    where are those sites???

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Brian, 9 Mar 2010 @ 6:40am

    No

    Probably not the best idea for Prince to do this. Seems like it would only be hurting him. Fans wanna support the artist. Also, for example, fans want to see things on YouTube. Who cares about some copyright by a company. Leave the videos up!

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.