BBC Takes Six Months To Not Really Criticize Its WiFi Scaremongering Report
from the that's-the-best-you-can-do? dept
You may recall that back in May the BBC's "Panorama" TV show was accused of running a scaremongering TV program about the supposed "dangers" of WiFi on children. There were numerous problems with the program, from bad science to bad reporting. You would think that the BBC might take those sorts of accusations seriously. Apparently, it was enough for the BBC's Editorial Complaints Unit to take a look at the issue. It took the ECU six months, but its report is out and it admits that Panorama made some mistakes, but really only cops to one particular mistake: that it presented the one dissenter on the program in a very biased light. It doesn't seem to say anything about the fact that a major source for the program happens to sell equipment designed to test how much "radiation" there is as well as products of questionable scientific value to "protect" you from such radiation (radiation protecting beekeeper hat anyone?). The whole thing was such a joke that even the kids in the school where some of the program was filmed pointed out how unscientific the experiment was. Unfortunately, the BBC doesn't seem to address any of that in its review of the program at all. Perhaps we'll need to wait another six months.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bad science, dangers, scaremongering, wifi
Companies: bbc
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No longer headline worthy
Unfortunately the John Sweeny+Scientology disaster utterly eclipsed the wi-fi fuss, and since then the BBC has had so many major scandels that no one really cares anymore. I'd be surprised if this gets any coverage at all in the mainstream press.
Which is a shame, as Panorama used to be an excellent series.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The only terrible thing is that the BBC
Under these conditions it can do anything it wants without any reprecussions - it does not have to adhere to any journalistic standard and, in fact, it does not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nosence
The BBC has taken a huge ammount of flak lately, and been the subject of a number of external investigations. Following this it lost its bid for a higher licence fee and as a result had to start making serious budget cuts.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
based on truth
The wifi issue is precarious. Various scientists (from both sides can prove whatever they want). The UK Govt has been given 40 billion in revenues from phone companies. It is my belief that when this amount of money is involved you shouldnt believe what you here from the industry side.
The German govt however, has issued warnings to its citizens about the dangers of wifi. A recent australian survey has linked mobile phone use by children to autism.
in the 1950's doctors advised people to smoke. we used asbestos to roof our buildings. Therefore decision makers do make mistakes. i will not have wifi in the house - all the kids switch their mobile phones off at night.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Nosence
But there's the problem the BBC is a legally enforced stealth tax/subscription that many, including myself, do not need nor want in the UK. As such the BBC can, and does, get away with just about anything.
What are you going to do? Not pay your TV Tax? If you do that you can expect the TV Tax enforcement agents of the BBC, also know as Capita, to send thugs to your property to force you to pay for an outdated, poorly managed, scandolous, dire and uncompetitive service.
The BBC license needs to be abolished and the BBC funded through clear advertisement, note I said clear because it is ALREADY paid in part by advertisments/sponsors, and/or an opt-in subscription service.
But then why would the BBC want the above, they get billions of pounds for free with the current model.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Nosence
Sheesh. Throw out and stream all your telly if its that big an issue.
And Dave, maybe its about time you stopped beliving in conspiracy theories and did some research of your own. The physics behind this stuff isn't exactly complex; read some A-Level books on the electromagnetic spectrum and it'll all be put in context.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why criticize itself
Like most of the so-called reporting that is presented on the BBC, the true aim is stealth propaganda against evil corporations and those dastardly capitalists. With an underlying message that more govt. regulations are needed.
[ link to this | view in thread ]