Marvel Looking To Follow In The Footsteps Of The Recording Industry
from the ignoring-good-advice dept
Last month I urged the comic book industry to accelerate its move into the digital world by releasing a lot more out-of-print comics online. I pointed out that this could generate some advertising revenue in the short run, but even more importantly it could increase public interest in old comics which would increase the demand for a wide variety of Marvel and DC products. Unfortunately, TorrentFreak is reporting that Marvel and DC are following in the footsteps of the recording industry, threatening people who are sharing their comics online without making any real effort to provide a viable alternative. TorrentFreak quotes an exchange between a Marvel employee and the people who run ComicSearch. ComicSearch makes some of the same points I did: there are a lot of fans who will buy a paper copy of a comic and download an electronic version so they can keep the paper copy in mint condition. They also point out that peer-to-peer sites have more and higher-quality scans than the official websites, and only peer-to-peer sites give you the option of downloading and organizing files on your hard drive. At a minimum, Marvel and DC should ensure that those fans who want to download high-quality scans of their comics have the option of paying to do so legally. ComicSearch also points out that comic sharing can have huge promotional value, creating increased fan interest and allowing Marvel and DC to sell more comic books, movie spin-offs, and merchandise. While Marvel and DC are certainly within their legal rights to try to stamp out unauthorized sharing of their comics, that doesn't mean that doing so is a good business strategy.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: bittorrent, comics
Companies: marvel
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Seriously?
Marvel has actually been doing quite a bit with digital distribution. They're doing it online: http://www.marvel.com/digitalcomics/
as well as selling DVDs of popular comic series:
http://www.amazon.com/40-Years-of-the-X-Men/dp/B000E28UT2/
Let's try to be fair.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Most of us who either work in or have followed this industry know that periodical sales are little more than a shadow of what they once were, and that lost sales due to unauthorised downloading have a disproportionately greater impact. (In some cases, those lost sales also represent lost royalties that would have been paid to freelance talent.)
It's entirely possible that the larger publishers are looking into or moving toward a model for digital distribution that works for them -- but does this mean they should be obliged to turn a blind eye while their rights are exploited?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Seriously?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why would it hurt them?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ummm, does anybody who have a life give a (beep)?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Cheap and lazy
Whatever.
I'm sure the job you have does not pay you for what they think you worked for the week, say maybe 10 hours out of 40. You get paid the full amount for the time you are "there" or collecting a salary for the "work" you do.
Once you give it away, it's hard to make the general public want to buy it. Hell, Techdirt does not give their services away for free, maybe they should and we can come back and buy the ones we like- NOT!!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
RE: Cheap and lazy
Now that I'm caught up, i keep my subscriptions up and they make more money they wouldn't have made otherwise.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Cheap and lazy
Serious? How much did you pay to read this post?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Last time I checked, it wasn't a legal necessity to offer an alternative in order to request people stop violating your copyright.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Cheap and lazy
Most people who don't think it through all the way, or even READ more than a few sentences, think that when people argue against the banning of downloading content.
For truth, it hasn't been argued that Marvel/DC should just "give" it away. The problem is they don't allow you to download (and PAY for) content of the same quality and volume as you can get elsewhere.
The majority of people want what they want, and will PAY for it if its of good quality. Wrapping something up in DRM so you can't look at it without THEIR tools is the same as buying a comic book and not being able to read it unless an official from Marvel/DC turns the pages for you. It's stupid, and people are irritated enough with it to think of 'stealing' (since its online, people who wouldn't shoplift will consider downloading something 'illegally') so they can turn the page themselves.
The writers at TechDirt have always, at least from what I've gathered from following the blog here, urged the content providers to raise the quality of their works. It can't be hard to do if people who aren't the content creators will GIVE the content away, so why do they take all these unnecessary steps (and COSTS) to make the content worthless to the majority of people?
How much money do these companies spend on DRM and other 'anti-piracy' schemes, and STILL have the content 'pirated' with the biggest excuse being given that its of better quality and functionality?
I can't see how they justify it from a business sense. No matter what you do to try to protect it, there IS away around it. Considering the volume of people saying they'd pay for it rather than 'steal' it if they'd give it to them right, and the other business examples (such as that one publisher, starts with a B. Crap can't remember, but they give their books out for free in .txt format and you can buy them at their online store and get a real copy sent to you in the mail. They do good to put it mildly) why not give it a try? They'd have nothing to lose compared to what they are already, except the spending spent on 'protection'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
For any business, the goal should be profit, not control. Right now, the profit does not seem to be in comic sales. There is a general lack of interest in comics as something to read.
I don't think what GK said about comic collectors being anti-social nerds is true (I only know 3 people who collect comics. My boss [which is awesome] and two of my dad's friends. One is a 55-year-old, happily married, father of 2 Methodist preacher and the other is, well, I'm not sure what he does, but he has 4 awesome kids) but the perception doesn't help the industry. Even though Marvel and DC movies are mainstream draws, general comic sales don't see much of the pie.
It isn't that the average reader wouldn't like comic books. It's that there are all sorts of barriers between the man and the sale. Even comic shops with friendly owners are intimidating, and they aren't exactly the majority of shops. For some people, going into a comic shop is only a few steps away from walking behind the curtain in a video shop.
The internet is a perfect way to bring in new readers. The market is obviously there. People clearly download comics and read them (though just like music, they always download more than they could possibly read). It’s money the comic creators are missing out of.
At the simplest, it’s a million eyes that could be looking at Marvel and D.C.’s ads while they download what they’re getting off of their websites. Only instead they don’t skip scanning the ads.
I actually have no problem with Marvel’s current system. At least, when I’m reading at work. It’s selection sucks, but the sample comic I read was perfectly readable, as it was coming at me on a T1 line. At home, I open all my webcomics in the morning and go take a shower (here’s your $35 for awesome Internet, Verizon).
There is no way I’d read comics online at a page every 2 minutes.
The key thing online comic sellers would have to do is beat the torrent folks. People are going to go wherever they can get their media the fastest. Offer the first issue for one-offs and the first story arc or more for established series. After that, they have a few options, but in the US’s broadband-starved market, downloadable-to-read-at-my-leisure-and-not-wait-for-the-page-to-load comics are essential.
Then they can do all sorts of things to beat the torrenters. E-mailed to your inbox or alerted via rss feed. Some kind of subscription service where you get x drm-free downloads per month and unlimited back-issue web viewing. Variable pricing (from $.10 for “Super No-Name and the Isle of Fun” to at the most $.99 for just-released issues [they are saving a ton by not printing in full color]). Free downloads with the normal printed ads.
It’s not that file sharers are greedy and think everything should be free. They just understand that bandwidth is dirt cheap and even $.10 cents for a 15 meg file in still $.095 cents profit. And comic companies, who are in no danger of going under thanks to other media’s help, can afford to try things that the other media companies won’t do.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why would it hurt them?
Granted, not everything can be reprinted -- the market for it just isn't there -- but this is an area where steps toward digital distribution have been taken (in the form of licensed DVD collections).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
All true, except you ignore all the other reasons that comic sales have gone down
a)Increased prices (for less content)
b)Too many titles (aka to much competition, much of it with titles by the same company, hell in many cases it is mutiple titles covering the same groups, at one stage there were nearly a dozen core X-Men/Mutant titles alone)
b)To many "epic universe scale cross overs", in the late 80's/early 90's these would happen maybe once every 2 years or so, now they are non stop, for fans to follow everything to do with their favorite characters they endup having to buy dozens of different titles each week. Combined with points a) and b) it becomes hard for even adult with a job to justify that kind of expenditure, for kid on an allowance or part time job it becomes impossible
"It's entirely possible that the larger publishers are looking into or moving toward a model for digital distribution that works for them -- but does this mean they should be obliged to turn a blind eye while their rights are exploited?"
Should they turn a blind eye? No
But should work harder at dealing with the bigger problems with their industry first? Most definatly
Hell if they deal with them they might just find that the majority of "pirates" become a thing of the past.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Marvel calls it "Essential".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Cheap and lazy
and the Techdirt services cost about $8,000, I guess if they offered a free alternative, more people would buy their services.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Well, that and determine if an electronic method of distribution would even be a viable one in the long term.
Sure, you can cut the costs significantly without the need for printing and distribution -- but the costs of content creation remain identical, and I'm not sure you could come up with a digital product at a price that would provide margins relative to a printed comic book and still be seen as an attractive alternative.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I don't understand this.
This is so, so wrong. Marvel and DC OWN this material. Who is anyone to tell them they have to do anything with it?
Stealing it and then saying "We will keep stealing it until you let us buy it." is plain and simple blackmail.
Let's say you buy a car. Your neighbor takes it for a drive when ever he wants without your permission. When you complain he says "Well you should let me pay you to rent it." We who the hell is he to take it to begin with?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Cheap and lazy
I just look at how many DVD's I've purchase at close to full price to see them on he $7.50 rack a couple months later, because the movie sucked in the first place.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I don't understand this.
2nd, your neighbor takes your car without permission, THAT IS STEALING, and a Felony.
3rd, if you were in the business of making cars and then deciding not to sell your best ones, but letting them sit and rust in a back lot, your analogy might make a bit of sense. But as it doesn't, maybe you should do something to raise your I.Q. a bit, or at least take a class on Critical Thinking and Logic.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
You say, "Once you give it away, it's hard to make the general public want to buy it."
Please explain bottled water.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I don't understand this.
so if someone said to you "let Me buy this or I will steal it, so there!" you would.. choose to Not let them buy it?
that may be proper recording/movie(and soon comic) industry thinking, but its bad business to anyone else.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why would it hurt them?
There is a strong pent up demand for digital download versions of comics that marvel and dc are not meeting. Marvel is making some moves in that market with their online offerings but their moves are quite timid. Full of ads, popups and not downloadable.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
There are many ways of presenting fantasy worlds.
...fantasy world presented by motion pictures.
...fantasy world presented by a (musical) recording industry.
...fantasy world presented by sequential art.
...fantasy world presented by descriptive prose.
...fantasy world presented by computer software.
There are others of course. Some of these have issues with
internet distribution.
I'm guessing that you probably care about some of these fantasy worlds.
If you try to claim that that you don't care about any of these, people
are likely going to look at you as weird.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I don't understand this.
Stealing it and then saying "We will keep stealing it until you let us buy it." is plain and simple blackmail.
Let's say you buy a car. Your neighbor takes it for a drive when ever he wants without your permission. When you complain he says "Well you should let me pay you to rent it." We who the hell is he to take it to begin with?"
No, no and no.
First of all, the analogies to physical products is always dumb. If I take your car, you no longer have that car. That's stealing, as you no longer have your property.
This is copyright infringment at worst. That means if I download a comic, I have done so without paying Marvel for the privilege. Now, that's where the article above comes in. Let's say I want to get hold of a Spiderman comic from the late 60s. I could buy a copy, but it would be second-hand (so Marvel wouldn't see any of my money anyway). A used copy would also be fragile, so I might be a little wary of reading it, open even taking it out of storage lest I reduce its value.
So, the next best thing is to get hold of a digital copy. Since Marvel doesn't offer me a way to download a high quality copy to my PC, I use P2P. I'm happy (I can read the comic I want), and Marvel hasn't lost anything since *they were not selling the product in the first place!*
That's the problem here. On the one hand, Marvel doesn't want to offer the kind of service that people want to pay for in the first place. On the other hand, they want to sue to stop anyone else offering the service for free.
Let me ask a question of the coporate defenders here: how exactly is anyone "stealing" from the publishers if they're refusing to offer the same service for any charge? If this was about new, first run comics, you might have a point. But this is about a second-hand market being replaced, so how are the publishers losing anything?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
the point
Personally, if I owned something that it is clear that people are seeking, I would try my damnedest to find a way to make a profit with limited to no cost. That's the whole point of capitalism.
Current structures want a monopoly on their works and all the control therein.
I think that like the anime industry instead of viewing the internet as the wild west of the information age, use it. We have had this medium for a few years now. This isn't so new that we (as consumers and producers) are in shock. Right now the next leaders in industry will be flexible in their business models to follow trend properly.
With visual content that can be digitized, you not only have the physical limitations of the market, but now you have to face the fact that some one will figure out a way to get around your protections.
Used the internet and it's billions of travelers:
Free market research
Trend spotting
the limited cost of the introduction of new products.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The market already exists..
After all of that they could still have a superior product at a reasonable price , like $1.50 an issue. Throw in the ability to "season-pass" your favorite books ,showcase new and up-and-coming talent for free or lower cost, Special online-only cover art or alternate page illustration and you could see a nice growth of revenue from casual readers as well as rabid gotta-have-it types and the start of a real distribution platform in the form of a Publisher controlled online comic store complete with
forums - comic collectors love to 1 Buy comics and 2 talk about comics ,
comic news - oh yea i forgot #3 Read about comics and
yes ads - noone likes ads but they do make the whole deal do-able for the companies.
I don't think that is unreasonable to ask for as well as it not being unreasonable for the publishers to actually try . As a side note - every day that goes by another potential online comic buyer becomes on online comic stealer ( or should I say copyright infringer) because a legally viable solution to high quality p2p scans simply does not exist.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
par for the course
That sounds about right. Pressuring unauthorized distributors (I refuse to call them pirates - real pirates generally *murder* people) in conjunction with, most importantly, putting out a product that people WANT should help them clear the air. It's the latter that's going to save them, of course - and how often does that happen without tears and tantrum?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I don't understand this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ugh
http://www.amazon.com/40-Years-of-the-X-Men/dp/B000E28UT2/"
I actually own this DVD. The irony is the quality is horrible on these DVDs compared to what you find on file sharing networks. There are a lot of people who put in a lot of time to get just a little better quality scan of X-Men issue whatever, whereas ... to be charitable ... the company behind these DVDs doesn't.
And its a lot like music downloading. The people I know who download lots of comics actually spend more now in their comic book stores than they did a few years ago. They're just spending it on action figures and posters and t-shirts and other epherma rather than on comics.
The reality in the comic book industry is that companies like Marvel already make most of their real money on licensing for movies, toys, etc. The recurring joke is that Marvel is going to get out of comics altogether and simply make movies and action figures.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Former heavy Comic buyer
Fast forward to college in 1986. There was a comic store so I went. 1st one I'd ever been to (none in my hometown). I started buying on a regular basis again. There was lotsa of good stuff. Love & Rockets with the rest of the indy comics. Deluxe editions, multiple covers. Manga.
There was also some crap as publishers catered to buy one to bag, one to read crowd.
After college I started reading lots of stuff. I was spending $30 each week. Anytime I tried new stuff, I had to spend $2-4 for the issue. If there was a crossover, I had to get everything to keep up with the story. Some good, mostly not. I got DC & Legion of Super Heroes. Most of the crossovers wouldn't affect LoHS unless they made some convoluted reason.
Fast forward to the 90s. I got married. I had less time. Plus I was spending $50/week for my fix. I found I wasn't reading them. So I stopped.
Now, I can find Graphic Novels in bookstores. Most of it is good stuff. So that's what I get. I spend lots less, I don't have to worry about missing a week/issue. It goes in the bookshelf easily too.
I have a 4 year old now. He's gone to the comic shop a few times. Most of the comics are geared for 20 year olds. No Gold Key or Richie Rich. Most titles are to be continued in the next issue. *sigh*
I think the audience grew up to a large extent. Thank goodness for Manga for having something to introduce kids to the medium.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: cutting publishing costs through digital distribution
Let's look at the costs:
Book Retail cost = $2.99
Diamond Distribution cost: 50%, so cost to make/print book is $1.50
Cost to 'Print' book, 50%, so cost of creators/illustrators/editors/etc. = approx $0.75.
I would gladly pay 75 cents an issue for new comic books. I currently buy only 3 per month because I really can't justify the cost. If they cost 75 cents, I would be able to buy 12 per month, and be able to store them on DVD (no more big clunky boxes in the basement.....)
I really don't understand why Marvel and others don't get on board.
How do you beat piracy? Find the price-point in the market for the resource. Remember: Economics preaches that Supply will eventually equal Demand. However, it is up to the comic company to determine if that should be 3 issues at $3 apiece, or 12 issues at 75 cents apiece.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: I don't understand this.
'Nuff said.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: cutting publishing costs through digital distribution
Which price point would go far towards discouraging online piracy? $3.00 per issue or 75cents per issue?
'Nuff Said.
[ link to this | view in thread ]